Schwender D, Keller I, Schlund M, Klasing S, Madler C
Institut für Anaesthesiologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.
Anaesthesist. 1991 Apr;40(4):214-21.
Auditory evoked potentials have been used as an indicator of awareness. During combined local and general anesthesia clinical signs of adequate anesthesia are difficult to evaluate. In the present study we combined peridural analgesia with three techniques of general anesthesia. Intraoperative wakefulness was documented and correlated with cardiocirculatory parameters as well as with mid-latency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP). METHODS. After institutional approval and informed consent 30 patients undergoing elective laparotomy were studied as follows: first, continuous peridural analgesia was instituted in all patients to block painful sensation of surgical stimuli and the anesthetic level was maintained at T5. Then general anesthesia was induced with propofol 2.5 mg/kg i.v. (group I, n = 10), thiopental 5 mg/kg i.v. (group II, n = 10), or etomidate 0.2 mg/kg i.v. (group III, n = 10) and maintained with propofol 3-5 mg/kg per hour i.v. (group I), isoflurane 0.4-0.8 vol.-% (group II), or flunitrazepam 0.005-0.01 mg/kg i.v. and fentanyl 0.0025-0.005 mg/kg i.v. bolus injections every 20-30 min (group III). Heart rate and arterial pressure were registered continuously. Purposeful movements of the limbs, eye-opening, or other movements as well as coughing were documented as signs of intraoperative wakefulness. AEP were recorded in the awake state, after induction, and during maintenance of general anesthesia. Latencies of the peaks V, Na, and Pa were measured. By fast-Fourier transformation corresponding power-spectra were calculated to analyze the energy content of the AEP frequency components. RESULTS. Intraoperative wakefulness occurred statistically significantly more often in the patients of group III than in those of groups I and II. There was no correlation between wakefulness and cardiocirculatory parameters. Latencies of peaks V, Na, and Pa in the awake patients were in the normal range; the corresponding power-spectra had their major energy content in the 30-40-Hz range. After induction of general anesthesia with propofol, thiopentone, and etomidate as well as during maintenance of general anesthesia with propofol and isoflurane peak latencies of Na and Pa increased, frequencies in the 30-40 Hz range became suppressed, and MLAEP energy maxima shifted to the low-frequency range. In contrast, during maintenance of general anesthesia with flunitrazepam/fentanyl peak latencies of Na and Pa returned to awake values and frequencies in the range of 30 Hz regained energy dominance in the corresponding power-spectra. CONCLUSIONS. The maintenance of MLAEP and the primary cortical complex Na/Pa correlates with the incidence of motor signs of wakefulness. During the combination of regional and general anesthesia, isoflurane and propofol seem to provide better suppression of intraoperative wakefulness than bolus injections of flunitrazepam/fentanyl.
听觉诱发电位已被用作意识的指标。在局部麻醉和全身麻醉联合使用期间,充分麻醉的临床体征难以评估。在本研究中,我们将硬膜外镇痛与三种全身麻醉技术相结合。记录术中觉醒情况,并将其与心血管循环参数以及中潜伏期听觉诱发电位(MLAEP)相关联。方法:经机构批准并获得知情同意后,对30例行择期剖腹手术的患者进行如下研究:首先,对所有患者实施连续硬膜外镇痛以阻断手术刺激的疼痛感觉,麻醉平面维持在T5。然后,分别用丙泊酚2.5mg/kg静脉注射(I组,n = 10)、硫喷妥钠5mg/kg静脉注射(II组,n = 10)或依托咪酯0.2mg/kg静脉注射(III组,n = 10)诱导全身麻醉,并分别用丙泊酚3 - 5mg/kg每小时静脉注射(I组)、异氟烷0.4 - 0.8体积%(II组)或氟硝西泮0.005 - 0.01mg/kg静脉注射和芬太尼0.0025 - 0.005mg/kg静脉注射,每20 - 30分钟推注一次(III组)维持麻醉。持续记录心率和动脉压。肢体的有意识运动、睁眼或其他运动以及咳嗽被记录为术中觉醒的体征。在清醒状态、诱导后以及全身麻醉维持期间记录听觉诱发电位。测量V波、Na波和Pa波的潜伏期。通过快速傅里叶变换计算相应的功率谱,以分析听觉诱发电位频率成分的能量含量。结果:III组患者术中觉醒的发生率在统计学上显著高于I组和II组患者。觉醒与心血管循环参数之间无相关性。清醒患者的V波、Na波和Pa波潜伏期在正常范围内;相应的功率谱其主要能量含量在30 - 40Hz范围内。用丙泊酚、硫喷妥钠和依托咪酯诱导全身麻醉后以及用丙泊酚和异氟烷维持全身麻醉期间,Na波和Pa波的峰值潜伏期延长,30 - 40Hz范围内的频率受到抑制,MLAEP能量最大值转移到低频范围。相比之下,在用氟硝西泮/芬太尼维持全身麻醉期间,Na波和Pa波的峰值潜伏期恢复到清醒值,30Hz范围内的频率在相应的功率谱中重新获得能量优势。结论:MLAEP和初级皮质复合波Na/Pa的维持与觉醒的运动体征发生率相关。在区域麻醉和全身麻醉联合使用期间,异氟烷和丙泊酚似乎比推注氟硝西泮/芬太尼能更好地抑制术中觉醒。