Brown Liana E, Rosenbaum David A, Sainburg Robert L
Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA.
J Neurophysiol. 2003 Nov;90(5):3105-18. doi: 10.1152/jn.00013.2003.
In the absence of visual feedback, subject reports of hand location tend to drift over time. Such drift has been attributed to a gradual reduction in the usefulness of proprioception to signal limb position. If this account is correct, drift should degrade the accuracy of movement distance and direction over a series of movements made without visual feedback. To test this hypothesis, we asked participants to perform six series of 75 repetitive movements from a visible start location to a visible target, in time with a regular, audible tone. Fingertip position feedback was given by a cursor during the first five trials in the series. Feedback was then removed, and participants were to continue on pace for the next 70 trials. Movements were made in two directions (30 degrees and 120 degrees ) from each of three start locations (initial shoulder angles of 30 degrees, 40 degrees, 50 degrees, and initial elbow angles of 90 degrees ). Over the 70 trials, the start location of each movement drifted, on average, 8 cm away from the initial start location. This drift varied systematically with movement direction, indicating that drift is related to movement production. However, despite these dramatic changes in hand position and joint configuration, movement distance and direction remained relatively constant. Inverse dynamics analysis revealed that movement preservation was accompanied by substantial modification of joint muscle torque. These results suggest that proprioception continues to be a reliable source of limb position information after prolonged time without vision, but that this information is used differently for maintaining limb position and for specifying movement trajectory.
在没有视觉反馈的情况下,随着时间推移,受试者对手部位置的报告往往会出现偏差。这种偏差被认为是本体感觉在传达肢体位置信号时的有效性逐渐降低所致。如果这种说法正确,那么在一系列无视觉反馈的动作中,偏差应该会降低动作距离和方向的准确性。为了验证这一假设,我们要求参与者随着有规律的可听音调,从一个可见的起始位置到一个可见目标进行六组,每组75次的重复动作。在每组的前五次试验中,通过光标提供指尖位置反馈。然后移除反馈,参与者要在接下来的70次试验中继续按节奏进行。动作从三个起始位置(初始肩部角度为30度、40度、50度,初始肘部角度为90度)中的每一个向两个方向(30度和120度)进行。在这70次试验中,每个动作的起始位置平均偏离初始起始位置8厘米。这种偏差随动作方向有系统地变化,表明偏差与动作产生有关。然而,尽管手部位置和关节构型发生了这些显著变化,动作距离和方向仍相对保持不变。逆动力学分析表明,动作的保持伴随着关节肌肉扭矩的大幅改变。这些结果表明,在长时间没有视觉的情况下,本体感觉仍然是肢体位置信息的可靠来源,但这种信息在维持肢体位置和确定动作轨迹时的使用方式有所不同。