Suppr超能文献

动作与词汇提取:非象形手势有助于提取吗?

Movement and lexical access: do noniconic gestures aid in retrieval?

作者信息

Ravizza Susan

机构信息

University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Sep;10(3):610-5. doi: 10.3758/bf03196522.

Abstract

The production of meaningful gestures has been claimed to enhance lexical access. However, the possibility that meaningless movements also improve retrieval has been largely ignored despite evidence that all types of movements increase with dysfluency. To examine this issue, we conducted two experiments to determine whether movements in general would improve lexical access in a tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) paradigm. TOT states were induced by presenting definitions of rare words that participants were then asked to recall. Participants who were required to tap at their own pace while retrieving words obtained significantly higher resolution rates than those who were immobile. Thus, movement does not have to be semantically related to the lexical item in order to aid in retrieval. However, tapping did not improve lexical access in all retrieval tasks. In a lexical retrieval task that relied more on executive abilities (letter fluency), participants who tapped retrieved fewer words than those who were immobile. The fact that movement enhanced lexical access only when retrieval depended on the automatic spread of activation suggests that facilitation may occur because of the activation of neural areas common to both speech and movement.

摘要

有观点认为,做出有意义的手势能够促进词汇提取。然而,尽管有证据表明各种类型的动作都会随着言语不流畅而增加,但无意义动作也能改善词汇提取这一可能性在很大程度上被忽视了。为了研究这个问题,我们进行了两项实验,以确定在舌尖现象(TOT)范式中,一般的动作是否会改善词汇提取。通过呈现生僻词的定义来诱发TOT状态,然后要求参与者回忆这些词。在检索单词时被要求按照自己的节奏轻敲的参与者,其回忆准确率显著高于那些静止不动的参与者。因此,动作不一定要与词汇项在语义上相关才能有助于检索。然而,轻敲并非在所有检索任务中都能改善词汇提取。在一项更多依赖执行能力(字母流畅性)的词汇检索任务中,轻敲的参与者比静止不动的参与者回忆出的单词更少。动作仅在检索依赖于激活的自动扩散时才会增强词汇提取,这一事实表明,促进作用可能是由于言语和动作共有的神经区域被激活所致。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验