Psychology Department, Wellesley College.
Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Cogn Sci. 2021 Jan;45(1):e12914. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12914.
People frequently gesture when a word is on the tip of their tongue (TOT), yet research is mixed as to whether and why gesture aids lexical retrieval. We tested three accounts: the lexical retrieval hypothesis, which predicts that semantically related gestures facilitate successful lexical retrieval; the cognitive load account, which predicts that matching gestures facilitate lexical retrieval only when retrieval is hard, as in the case of a TOT; and the motor movement account, which predicts that any motor movements should support lexical retrieval. In Experiment 1 (a between-subjects study; N = 90), gesture inhibition, but not neck inhibition, affected TOT resolution but not overall lexical retrieval; participants in the gesture-inhibited condition resolved fewer TOTs than participants who were allowed to gesture. When participants could gesture, they produced more representational gestures during resolved than unresolved TOTs, a pattern not observed for meaningless motor movements (e.g., beats). However, the effect of gesture inhibition on TOT resolution was not uniform; some participants resolved many TOTs, while others struggled. In Experiment 2 (a within-subjects study; N = 34), the effect of gesture inhibition was traced to individual differences in verbal, not spatial short-term memory (STM) span; those with weaker verbal STM resolved fewer TOTs when unable to gesture. This relationship between verbal STM and TOT resolution was not observed when participants were allowed to gesture. Taken together, these results fit the cognitive load account; when lexical retrieval is hard, gesture effectively reduces the cognitive load of TOT resolution for those who find the task especially taxing.
人们在词到嘴边(TOT)时经常会打手势,但关于手势是否以及为何有助于词汇检索,研究结果不一。我们检验了三种解释:词汇检索假说预测语义相关的手势有助于成功检索词汇;认知负荷假说预测只有在检索困难时(如 TOT 情况下),匹配的手势才会有助于检索;运动动作假说预测任何运动动作都应支持词汇检索。在实验 1(一项被试间研究;N=90)中,手势抑制而非颈部抑制影响 TOT 解决但不影响整体词汇检索;在被允许打手势的条件下,参与者比在被抑制打手势的条件下解决的 TOT 更少。当参与者可以打手势时,他们在解决的 TOT 中比在未解决的 TOT 中产生更多的代表性手势,而对于无意义的运动动作(例如拍打)则没有观察到这种模式。然而,手势抑制对 TOT 解决的影响并不均匀;一些参与者解决了很多 TOT,而另一些则很困难。在实验 2(一项被试内研究;N=34)中,手势抑制的影响可追溯至言语而非空间短期记忆(STM)广度的个体差异;当无法打手势时,言语 STM 较弱的参与者解决的 TOT 较少。当允许参与者打手势时,没有观察到言语 STM 和 TOT 解决之间的这种关系。总的来说,这些结果符合认知负荷假说;当词汇检索困难时,对于那些发现任务特别费力的人来说,手势可以有效地减轻 TOT 解决的认知负荷。