• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四种不同缝合材料在大鼠软组织中的比较。

Comparison of four different suture materials in soft tissues of rats.

作者信息

Yaltirik M, Dedeoglu K, Bilgic B, Koray M, Ersev H, Issever H, Dulger O, Soley S

机构信息

Department of Oral Surgery and Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Capa, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Oral Dis. 2003 Nov;9(6):284-6. doi: 10.1034/j.1601-0825.2003.00954.x.

DOI:10.1034/j.1601-0825.2003.00954.x
PMID:14629327
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this in vivo study was to histopathologically evaluate the inflammatory reaction incited by Vicryl in rats and compare this material with various suture materials that are widely used in the clinic.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Four different suture materials, catgut, silk, polypropylene, and Vicryl were used in soft tissues of 32 Sprague-Dawley rats. Incisions performed were sutured by a standard technique. Eight rats were killed at the first, third, fifth, and seventh days. Histopathological evaluation of the en bloc samples was performed by determining the density of seven cell-types. A numerical grading from one to three was used. The data were statistically analysed by Kruskal-Wallis one way ANOVA and Dunn's tests.

RESULTS

Vicryl has produced the mildest tissue reaction among the test materials at all experimental periods (P<0.05). Total cell number value in Vicryl group was found to be significantly lower than the one in catgut group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Under the conditions of this study, the results demonstrated that Vicryl as a suture material produced the mildest tissue reaction during early healing period.

摘要

目的

本体内研究旨在通过组织病理学评估薇乔缝线在大鼠体内引发的炎症反应,并将该材料与临床广泛使用的各种缝合材料进行比较。

对象与方法

在32只Sprague-Dawley大鼠的软组织中使用四种不同的缝合材料,即肠线、丝线、聚丙烯缝线和薇乔缝线。采用标准技术对切口进行缝合。在第1、3、5和7天处死8只大鼠。通过测定七种细胞类型的密度对整块样本进行组织病理学评估。采用1至3的数字分级。数据通过Kruskal-Wallis单因素方差分析和邓恩检验进行统计学分析。

结果

在所有实验阶段,薇乔缝线在受试材料中引发的组织反应最为轻微(P<0.05)。薇乔缝线组的总细胞数显著低于肠线组(P<0.05)。

结论

在本研究条件下,结果表明薇乔缝线作为一种缝合材料在早期愈合阶段引发的组织反应最为轻微。

相似文献

1
Comparison of four different suture materials in soft tissues of rats.四种不同缝合材料在大鼠软组织中的比较。
Oral Dis. 2003 Nov;9(6):284-6. doi: 10.1034/j.1601-0825.2003.00954.x.
2
Comparison of Maxon suture with Vicryl, chromic catgut, and PDS sutures in fascial closure in rats.在大鼠筋膜闭合中Maxon缝线与薇乔缝线、铬制肠线和PDS缝线的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Mar;71(3 Pt 1):418-22.
3
Immunohistochemical comparison of indermil with traditional suture materials in dental surgery.牙科手术中Indermil与传统缝合材料的免疫组织化学比较。
J Craniofac Surg. 2011 Sep;22(5):1875-9. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31822e8419.
4
Comparison of a polyglycolic-polylactic acid suture to black silk and plain catgut in human oral tissues.聚乙醇酸-聚乳酸缝线与黑色丝线及普通肠线在人体口腔组织中的比较。
J Oral Surg. 1978 Oct;36(10):766-70.
5
[Reaction of some suture materials on the process of intestinal healing. Experimental study (author's transl)].某些缝合材料对肠愈合过程的反应。实验研究(作者译)
J Chir (Paris). 1979 Oct;116(10):609-11.
6
Investigation of microcirculatory changes in the duodenum of dogs caused by surgical suture materials.手术缝合材料引起的犬十二指肠微循环变化的研究
Acta Chir Hung. 1997;36(1-4):274-6.
7
Histologic response to microsuture materials.对显微缝合材料的组织学反应。
J Reprod Med. 1988 Jul;33(7):615-23.
8
Effect of suture materials on healing skin wounds.缝合材料对皮肤伤口愈合的影响。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1975 Jan;140(1):7-12.
9
Influence of suturing material on wound healing - An experimental study on dogs.缝合材料对伤口愈合的影响——一项在狗身上进行的实验研究。
Vojnosanit Pregl. 2015 May;72(5):397-404. doi: 10.2298/vsp140122054g.
10
An experimental comparison of suture materials for tracheal and bronchial anastomoses.
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1986 Dec;34(6):384-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1022179.

引用本文的文献

1
Antimicrobial use in laboratory rodent facilities in Australia and New Zealand- a cross-sectional survey of veterinarians and facility managers.澳大利亚和新西兰实验室啮齿动物设施中的抗菌药物使用情况——兽医和设施管理人员的横断面调查。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 23;19(8):e0292908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292908. eCollection 2024.
2
Immediate effect of different herbal solutions on tensile strength of suture materials in oral cavity.不同草药溶液对口腔缝合材料拉伸强度的即时影响。
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 26;10(15):e35241. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35241. eCollection 2024 Aug 15.
3
Nylons with Applications in Energy Generators, 3D Printing and Biomedicine.
用于能源发生器、3D 打印和生物医学的尼龙。
Molecules. 2024 May 22;29(11):2443. doi: 10.3390/molecules29112443.
4
The Regulatory Effect of Braided Silk Fiber Skeletons with Differential Porosities on In Vivo Vascular Tissue Regeneration and Long-Term Patency.不同孔隙率的编织丝纤维支架对体内血管组织再生及长期通畅性的调节作用
Research (Wash D C). 2022 Nov 11;2022:9825237. doi: 10.34133/2022/9825237. eCollection 2022.
5
Continuous Microfiber Wire Mandrel-Less Biofabrication for Soft Tissue Engineering Applications.连续微纤维丝无芯体生物制造技术在软组织工程应用中的研究进展
Adv Healthc Mater. 2022 Jul;11(13):e2102613. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202102613. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
6
Update on Suture Techniques in Corneal Transplantation: A Systematic Review.角膜移植缝合技术的最新进展:一项系统综述
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 18;11(4):1078. doi: 10.3390/jcm11041078.
7
Effect of Hyaluronic Acid in Modifying Tensile Strength of Nonabsorbable Suture Materials: An Study.透明质酸对不可吸收缝合材料拉伸强度的影响:一项研究。
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2020 Feb 5;10(1):16-20. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_343_19. eCollection 2020 Jan-Feb.
8
Prevention of secondary caries by a new antibacterial compound.一种新型抗菌化合物预防继发龋
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2020 Jan 21;17(1):40-47. eCollection 2020 Jan-Feb.
9
Tensile Strength of Novel Nonabsorbable PTFE (Teflon®) versus Other Suture Materials: An In Vitro Study.新型不可吸收聚四氟乙烯(特氟龙®)与其他缝合材料的拉伸强度:一项体外研究。
Int J Dent. 2019 Oct 9;2019:7419708. doi: 10.1155/2019/7419708. eCollection 2019.
10
Diagnostic Efficacy of F-FDG PET/MRI in Peripheral Nerve Injury Models.F-FDG PET/MRI 在周围神经损伤模型中的诊断效能。
Neurochem Res. 2019 Sep;44(9):2092-2102. doi: 10.1007/s11064-019-02846-w. Epub 2019 Aug 3.