• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Giving rheumatology patients online home access to their electronic medical record (EMR): advantages, drawbacks and preconditions according to care providers.为风湿病患者提供在线访问其电子病历(EMR)的权限:根据医疗服务提供者的观点,其优缺点和前提条件。
Rheumatol Int. 2013 Sep;33(9):2405-10. doi: 10.1007/s00296-012-2408-2. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
2
Impact of patient-accessible electronic medical records in rheumatology: use, satisfaction and effects on empowerment among patients.患者可获取的电子病历在风湿病学中的影响:患者的使用情况、满意度及其对赋权的影响
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Mar 26;15:102. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-102.
3
Maternity patients' access to their electronic medical records: use and perspectives of a patient portal.产妇获取其电子病历:患者门户网站的使用情况与观点
Health Inf Manag. 2015;44(1):4-11. doi: 10.1177/183335831504400101.
4
Patient Use and Experience With Online Access to Electronic Health Records in Norway: Results From an Online Survey.挪威患者使用在线获取电子健康记录的情况及体验:在线调查结果
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Feb 7;22(2):e16144. doi: 10.2196/16144.
5
"Nothing About Me Without Me": An Interpretative Review of Patient Accessible Electronic Health Records.“没有我参与,就没有与我相关的事”:对患者可获取的电子健康记录的解读性综述
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 29;17(6):e161. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4446.
6
[Establishment of an electronic medical record in a psychiatric hospital: evolution of professionals' perceptions].[精神病医院电子病历的建立:专业人员认知的演变]
Encephale. 2010 Jun;36(3):236-41. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2009.05.004. Epub 2009 Oct 24.
7
Blending online therapy into regular face-to-face therapy for depression: content, ratio and preconditions according to patients and therapists using a Delphi study.将在线治疗融入抑郁症常规面对面治疗:基于德尔菲研究的患者和治疗师视角的内容、比例及前提条件
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Dec 14;14:355. doi: 10.1186/s12888-014-0355-z.
8
The urban underserved: attitudes towards gaining full access to electronic medical records.城市中未得到充分服务的人群:对全面获取电子病历的态度。
Health Expect. 2014 Oct;17(5):724-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00799.x. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
9
Electronic multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (eMDHAQ): past, present and future of a proposed single data management system for clinical care, research, quality improvement, and monitoring of long-term outcomes.电子多维健康评估问卷(eMDHAQ):一种用于临床护理、研究、质量改进和长期结果监测的单一数据管理系统的过去、现在和未来。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016 Sep-Oct;34(5 Suppl 101):S17-S33. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
10
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Portals Facilitating Engagement With Inpatient Electronic Medical Records: A Systematic Review.促进住院电子病历参与度的患者门户:一项系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 11;21(4):e12779. doi: 10.2196/12779.
2
A Cloud-Based Virtual Outpatient Clinic for Patient-Centered Care: Proof-of-Concept Study.基于云的以患者为中心的虚拟门诊诊所:概念验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Sep 24;20(9):e10135. doi: 10.2196/10135.
3
A case study of stakeholder perceptions of patient held records: the Patients Know Best (PKB) solution.利益相关者对患者持有的记录的看法的案例研究:患者最佳信息(PKB)解决方案。
Digit Health. 2016 Sep 21;2:2055207616668431. doi: 10.1177/2055207616668431. eCollection 2016 Jan-Dec.
4
Disparities in Electronic Health Record Patient Portal Use in Nephrology Clinics.肾脏病诊所电子健康记录患者门户使用情况的差异
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Nov 6;10(11):2013-22. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01640215. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
5
Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review.患者门户网站与患者参与度:科学现状综述
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 23;17(6):e148. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4255.
6
Patient-initiated electronic health record amendment requests.患者发起的电子健康记录修正请求。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):992-1000. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002574. Epub 2014 May 26.
7
Impact of patient-accessible electronic medical records in rheumatology: use, satisfaction and effects on empowerment among patients.患者可获取的电子病历在风湿病学中的影响:患者的使用情况、满意度及其对赋权的影响
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Mar 26;15:102. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-102.
8
Measuring actual eHealth literacy among patients with rheumatic diseases: a qualitative analysis of problems encountered using Health 1.0 and Health 2.0 applications.测量风湿性疾病患者的实际电子健康素养:对使用健康1.0和健康2.0应用程序时遇到的问题进行定性分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Feb 11;15(2):e27. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2428.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient preferences for a hospital-based rheumatology Interactive Health Communication Application and factors associated with these preferences.患者对基于医院的风湿病学交互式健康交流应用的偏好,以及与这些偏好相关的因素。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011 Sep;50(9):1618-26. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker161. Epub 2011 May 6.
2
How patients use access to their electronic GP record--a quantitative study.患者如何使用其电子 GP 记录——一项定量研究。
Fam Pract. 2011 Apr;28(2):188-94. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmq092. Epub 2010 Nov 17.
3
Changing attitudes towards online electronic health records and online patient documentation in rheumatology outpatients.转变风湿病门诊患者对在线电子健康记录和在线患者文档的态度。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2010 Mar-Apr;28(2):261-4. Epub 2010 May 13.
4
Improving personal health records for patient-centered care.改善个人健康记录,以实现以患者为中心的护理。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Mar-Apr;17(2):192-5. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2009.000927.
5
How patients use access to their full health records: a qualitative study of patients in general practice.患者如何使用其完整健康记录:一般实践中患者的定性研究。
J R Soc Med. 2009 Dec;102(12):539-44. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2009.090328.
6
Comparing patient-reported hospital adverse events with medical record review: do patients know something that hospitals do not?比较患者报告的医院不良事件与病历审查结果:患者是否知晓一些医院未知的情况?
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Jul 15;149(2):100-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-2-200807150-00006.
7
Patient-centered applications: use of information technology to promote disease management and wellness. A white paper by the AMIA knowledge in motion working group.以患者为中心的应用:利用信息技术促进疾病管理与健康。美国医学信息学会知识流动工作组白皮书。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008 Jan-Feb;15(1):8-13. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2492. Epub 2007 Oct 18.
8
Why facilitate patient access to medical records.为何要方便患者获取病历。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;127:77-90.
9
Patient web services integrated with a shared medical record: patient use and satisfaction.与共享病历集成的患者网络服务:患者使用情况与满意度
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Nov-Dec;14(6):798-806. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2302. Epub 2007 Aug 21.
10
Clinicians recognize value of patient review of their electronic health record data.临床医生认识到患者查看其电子健康记录数据的价值。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006;2006:1101.

为风湿病患者提供在线访问其电子病历(EMR)的权限:根据医疗服务提供者的观点,其优缺点和前提条件。

Giving rheumatology patients online home access to their electronic medical record (EMR): advantages, drawbacks and preconditions according to care providers.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Citadel H423, P. O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Rheumatol Int. 2013 Sep;33(9):2405-10. doi: 10.1007/s00296-012-2408-2. Epub 2012 Mar 28.

DOI:10.1007/s00296-012-2408-2
PMID:22453527
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3751211/
Abstract

Technology enables patients home access to their electronic medical record (EMR), via a patient portal. This study aims to analyse (dis)advantages, preconditions and suitable content for this service, according to rheumatology health professionals. A two-phase policy Delphi study was conducted. First, interviews were performed with nurses/nurse practitioners (n = 9) and rheumatologists (n = 13). Subsequently, collected responses were quantified, using a questionnaire among the interviewees. The following advantages of patient home access to the EMR were reported: (1) enhancement of patient participation in treatment, (2) increased knowledge and self-management, (3) improved patient-provider interaction, (4) increased patient safety, and (5) better communication with others. Foreseen disadvantages of the service included: (1) problems with interpretation of data, (2) extra workload, (3) a change in consultation content, and (4) disturbing the patient-provider interaction. Also, the following preconditions emerged from the data: (1) optimal security, (2) no extra record, but a patient-accessible section, (3) no access to clinical notes, and (4) a lag time on the release of lab data. Most respondents reported that data on diagnosis, medication, treatment plan and consultations could be released to patients. On releasing more complex data, such as bodily examinations, lab results and radiological images the opinions differed considerably. Providing patients home access to their medical record might be a valuable next step into patient empowerment and in service towards the patient, provided that security is optimal and content and presentation of data are carefully considered.

摘要

技术使患者能够通过患者门户在家访问其电子病历 (EMR)。本研究旨在根据风湿病健康专业人员分析这项服务的(不)优势、前提条件和适用内容。进行了两阶段政策 Delphi 研究。首先,对护士/执业护师(n=9)和风湿病医生(n=13)进行了访谈。随后,在受访者中使用问卷对收集到的回复进行量化。报告了患者在家访问 EMR 的以下优势:(1) 增强患者对治疗的参与度,(2) 增加知识和自我管理,(3) 改善医患互动,(4) 提高患者安全性,以及 (5) 与他人更好地沟通。预计该服务存在以下缺点:(1) 数据解释问题,(2) 额外工作量,(3) 咨询内容变化,以及 (4) 干扰医患互动。此外,数据还显示了以下前提条件:(1) 最佳安全性,(2) 没有额外的记录,而是患者可访问的部分,(3) 无法访问临床记录,以及 (4) 实验室数据发布的延迟时间。大多数受访者报告说,可以向患者发布诊断、药物、治疗计划和咨询等数据。在发布更复杂的数据(如体检、实验室结果和影像学图像)时,意见差异很大。为患者提供在家访问其病历的权限可能是患者赋权和面向患者服务的有价值的下一步,前提是安全性最佳,并且数据的内容和呈现经过仔细考虑。