• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疑似急性阑尾炎诊断方法的前瞻性评估

Prospective evaluation of diagnostic modalities in suspected acute appendicitis.

作者信息

Tepel Juergen, Sommerfeld Annette, Klomp Hans-Juergen, Kapischke Matthias, Eggert Albrecht, Kremer Bernd

机构信息

Department of General Surgery and Thoracic Surgery, University-Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold Heller Strasse 7, 24105 Kiel, Germany.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2004 Jun;389(3):219-24. doi: 10.1007/s00423-003-0439-6. Epub 2003 Nov 22.

DOI:10.1007/s00423-003-0439-6
PMID:14634825
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate different diagnostic modalities routinely employed in a district hospital.

METHOD

Four hundred subsequent patients presenting with acute abdominal pain were included over a period of 18 months. Patient characteristics, diagnostic work-up, intraoperative findings, histology and clinical outcome were documented. Rectal temperature, white cell count (WCC), C-reactive protein (CRP), ultrasonography (US) and Ohmann score were analysed with relation to diagnostic value.

RESULTS

Negative appendicectomy rate and negative laparotomy rate on the day of admission were 22% and 21%, respectively. Sensitivity was highest for WCC and CRP (0.82 and 0.85) but US showed highest values for specificity (0.92), accuracy (0.85) and odds ratio (13.06). No patient with an Ohmann score below 6.5 suffered from acute appendicitis. With regard to different levels of training in US, experienced surgeons and radiologists had best values for specificity (1.00 and 0.98) and accuracy (0.90 and 0.94). Surprisingly, less-experienced sonographers also achieved good results with regard to specificity (up to 0.96) and positive predictive value (up to 0.89).

CONCLUSION

Diagnostic accuracy of acute appendicitis remains insufficient, with an unacceptable high rate of unnecessary operations. Only the promotion of routine ultrasonography might contribute to an improvement in the near future.

摘要

背景

本前瞻性研究的目的是评估一家地区医院常规使用的不同诊断方法。

方法

在18个月的时间里纳入了400例随后出现急性腹痛的患者。记录患者特征、诊断检查、术中发现、组织学和临床结果。分析直肠温度、白细胞计数(WCC)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、超声检查(US)和奥曼评分与诊断价值的关系。

结果

入院当天阴性阑尾切除术率和阴性剖腹术率分别为22%和21%。WCC和CRP的敏感性最高(分别为0.82和0.85),但US在特异性(0.92)、准确性(0.85)和比值比(13.06)方面显示出最高值。奥曼评分低于6.5的患者均未患急性阑尾炎。关于US的不同培训水平,经验丰富的外科医生和放射科医生在特异性(分别为1.00和0.98)和准确性(分别为0.90和0.94)方面具有最佳值。令人惊讶的是,经验较少的超声检查人员在特异性(高达0.96)和阳性预测值(高达0.89)方面也取得了良好的结果。

结论

急性阑尾炎的诊断准确性仍然不足,不必要手术的发生率高得令人无法接受。只有推广常规超声检查可能在不久的将来有助于改善这种情况。

相似文献

1
Prospective evaluation of diagnostic modalities in suspected acute appendicitis.疑似急性阑尾炎诊断方法的前瞻性评估
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2004 Jun;389(3):219-24. doi: 10.1007/s00423-003-0439-6. Epub 2003 Nov 22.
2
Comparison of clinical judgment and diagnostic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: experience with a score-aided diagnosis.临床判断与诊断性超声检查在急性阑尾炎诊断中的比较:评分辅助诊断经验
Eur J Surg. 1997 Jun;163(6):433-43.
3
The role of white cell count and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.白细胞计数和C反应蛋白在急性阑尾炎诊断中的作用。
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2004 Jul-Sep;16(3):17-9.
4
The clinical value of pathology tests and imaging study in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.病理学检查和影像学研究在急性阑尾炎诊断中的临床价值。
Postgrad Med J. 2016 Oct;92(1092):611-9. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2015-133865. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
5
Clinical decision-making, ultrasonography, and scores for evaluation of suspected acute appendicitis.疑似急性阑尾炎评估中的临床决策、超声检查及评分
World J Surg. 2001 May;25(5):578-84. doi: 10.1007/s002680020078.
6
Influence of ultrasound on clinical decision making in acute appendicitis: a prospective study.超声对急性阑尾炎临床决策的影响:一项前瞻性研究。
Eur J Surg. 1998 Mar;164(3):201-9. doi: 10.1080/110241598750004652.
7
Accuracy in diagnosis of acute appendicitis by comparing serum C-reactive protein measurements, Alvarado score and clinical impression of surgeons.通过比较血清C反应蛋白测量值、阿尔瓦拉多评分和外科医生的临床印象来诊断急性阑尾炎的准确性。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2004 Mar;87(3):296-303.
8
Importance of Clinical Decision Making by Experienced Pediatric Surgeons When Children Are Suspected of Having Acute Appendicitis: The Reality in a High-Volume Pediatric Emergency Department.经验丰富的儿科外科医生在儿童疑似患有急性阑尾炎时进行临床决策的重要性:大容量儿科急诊科的实际情况
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2017 Sep;33(9):e38-e42. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000763.
9
The diagnostic value of C-reactive protein, white blood cell count and neutrophil percentage in childhood appendicitis.C反应蛋白、白细胞计数及中性粒细胞百分比在儿童阑尾炎中的诊断价值。
Saudi Med J. 2004 Sep;25(9):1212-5.
10
A simple clinical decision rule to rule out appendicitis in patients with nondiagnostic ultrasound results.一种简单的临床决策规则,可排除超声结果不具诊断性的阑尾炎患者。
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 May;21(5):488-96. doi: 10.1111/acem.12374.

引用本文的文献

1
Signs and symptoms of serious illness in adults with acute abdominal pain presenting to ambulatory care: a systematic review.成人急性腹痛患者在门诊就诊时严重疾病的体征和症状:一项系统评价
BJGP Open. 2024 Oct 29;8(3). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0245. Print 2024 Oct.
2
Investigating Diagnostic Value of Ultrasonography in Acute Appendicitis.超声检查在急性阑尾炎中的诊断价值研究
Adv Biomed Res. 2018 Jul 20;7:113. doi: 10.4103/abr.abr_79_18. eCollection 2018.
3
Developing and validating of Ramathibodi Appendicitis Score (RAMA-AS) for diagnosis of appendicitis in suspected appendicitis patients.

本文引用的文献

1
The clinical and economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis: nationwide analysis.误诊阑尾炎的临床和经济关联:全国性分析
Arch Surg. 2002 Jul;137(7):799-804; discussion 804. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.137.7.799.
2
The rational use of computed tomography scans in the diagnosis of appendicitis.计算机断层扫描在阑尾炎诊断中的合理应用。
Am J Surg. 2002 May;183(5):547-50. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(02)00850-4.
3
99m Tc anti-CD 15 monoclonal antibody (LeuTech) imaging improves diagnostic accuracy and clinical management in patients with equivocal presentation of appendicitis.
开发和验证 Ramathibodi 阑尾炎评分(RAMA-AS)用于诊断疑似阑尾炎患者的阑尾炎。
World J Emerg Surg. 2017 Nov 9;12:49. doi: 10.1186/s13017-017-0160-3. eCollection 2017.
4
Appendicopathy--a clinical and diagnostic dilemma.阑尾病——临床和诊断的难题。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013 Aug;28(8):1081-9. doi: 10.1007/s00384-013-1677-x. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
5
Patient factors influencing the effect of surgeon-performed ultrasound on the acute abdomen.影响外科医生实施的超声检查对急腹症效果的患者因素。
Crit Ultrasound J. 2010 Dec;2(3):97-105. doi: 10.1007/s13089-010-0040-5. Epub 2010 Nov 12.
6
Diagnostic score in acute appendicitis. Validation of a diagnostic score (Lintula score) for adults with suspected appendicitis.急性阑尾炎诊断评分。一种用于诊断疑似阑尾炎的成年人的诊断评分(Lintula 评分)的验证。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010 Jun;395(5):495-500. doi: 10.1007/s00423-010-0627-0. Epub 2010 Apr 9.
7
Pain as the only consistent sign of acute appendicitis: lack of inflammatory signs does not exclude the diagnosis.疼痛是急性阑尾炎唯一始终存在的症状:无炎症征象不能排除诊断。
World J Surg. 2010 Feb;34(2):210-5. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0349-z.
8
Unexpected findings on laparoscopy for suspected acute appendicitis: a pro for laparoscopic appendectomy as the standard procedure for acute appendicitis.腹腔镜检查疑似急性阑尾炎的意外发现:腹腔镜阑尾切除术作为急性阑尾炎标准手术的优势。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010 Nov;395(8):1069-76. doi: 10.1007/s00423-009-0567-8. Epub 2009 Nov 19.
9
[Appendicitis in the elderly. CRP value as decision support for diagnostic laparoscopy].[老年人阑尾炎。CRP值作为诊断性腹腔镜检查的决策支持]
Chirurg. 2009 Jul;80(7):608-14. doi: 10.1007/s00104-009-1754-4.
10
[Strategy for avoidance of negative appendectomies].
Chirurg. 2009 Jul;80(7):588-93. doi: 10.1007/s00104-009-1686-z.
99m锝标记抗CD15单克隆抗体(LeuTech)成像可提高阑尾炎表现不明确患者的诊断准确性并改善临床管理。
Ann Surg. 2002 Feb;235(2):232-9. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200202000-00011.
4
Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based analysis.阑尾炎的误诊率是否随时间下降?一项基于人群的分析。
JAMA. 2001 Oct 10;286(14):1748-53. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.14.1748.
5
Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis.计算机断层扫描和超声检查并不能改善急性阑尾炎的诊断和治疗,反而可能会延误诊断和治疗。
Arch Surg. 2001 May;136(5):556-62. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.136.5.556.
6
Ultrasonography in diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Diagnostic laparoscopy is often more useful than ultrasonography.超声检查在急性阑尾炎诊断中的应用。诊断性腹腔镜检查通常比超声检查更有用。
BMJ. 2001 Mar 10;322(7286):615.
7
Appendicitis: why so complicated? Analysis of 5755 consecutive appendectomies.阑尾炎:为何如此复杂?对5755例连续阑尾切除术的分析。
Am Surg. 2000 Jun;66(6):548-54.
8
[Validation of a diagnostic scoring system (Ohmann score) in acute appendicitis].[急性阑尾炎诊断评分系统(奥曼评分)的验证]
Chirurg. 1999 Jul;70(7):777-83; discussion 784. doi: 10.1007/s001040050721.
9
Perforating appendicitis: is it a separate disease? Acute Abdominal Pain Study Group.穿孔性阑尾炎:它是一种独立的疾病吗?急性腹痛研究小组。
Eur J Surg. 1999 May;165(5):473-80. doi: 10.1080/110241599750006730.
10
Ultrasonography for diagnosis of acute appendicitis: results of a prospective multicenter trial. Acute Abdominal Pain Study Group.超声检查诊断急性阑尾炎:一项前瞻性多中心试验的结果。急性腹痛研究组
World J Surg. 1999 Feb;23(2):141-6. doi: 10.1007/pl00013165.