Koch Alexander J, O'Bryant Harold S, Stone Margaret E, Sanborn Kim, Proulx Christopher, Hruby Joe, Shannonhouse Elizabeth, Boros Rhonda, Stone Michael H
Truman State University, Kirksville, Missouri 63501, USA.
J Strength Cond Res. 2003 Nov;17(4):710-4. doi: 10.1519/1533-4287(2003)017<0710:eowots>2.0.co;2.
The effect of 3 warm-up routines on standing broad jump (SBJ) performance was investigated. Thirty-two men and women participated as subjects. Following the determination of 1-repetition maximum (1RM) squat, subjects completed warm-up routines and broad jumps on 4 occasions in a randomized order. Subjects performed SBJ immediately (POST) and 15 min following (POST15) the given warm-up routine. The routines were high force, consisting of high % 1RM, low repetition squats; high power, consisting of low % 1RM, low repetition speed squats; stretching, consisting of static stretches; and no activity, a control condition. Repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) revealed no differences among broad jump performance following any of the warm-up routines (p = 0.157). A strong correlation (R = 0.805) was found between 1RM squat and SBJ. These data indicate that warm-up of any type has little effect on jump performance and that maximum strength is strongly related to jumping ability.
研究了3种热身程序对立定跳远（SBJ）成绩的影响。32名男性和女性作为受试者参与研究。在确定1次重复最大值（1RM）深蹲后，受试者以随机顺序在4个场合完成热身程序和跳远。受试者在给定热身程序后立即（POST）和15分钟后（POST15）进行SBJ测试。这些程序包括：高强度，即高百分比1RM、低重复次数深蹲；高功率，即低百分比1RM、低重复速度深蹲；拉伸，即静态拉伸；以及无活动，作为对照条件。重复测量协方差分析（ANCOVA）显示，在任何热身程序后，跳远成绩之间没有差异（p = 0.157）。发现1RM深蹲与SBJ之间存在强相关性（R = 0.805）。这些数据表明，任何类型的热身对跳跃成绩影响很小，并且最大力量与跳跃能力密切相关。
