Lopes da Silva Fernando, Blanes Wouter, Kalitzin Stiliyan N, Parra Jaime, Suffczynski Piotr, Velis Demetrios N
SEIN, Special Centre for Epilepsy in the Netherlands, Meer en Bosch, Heemstede, The Netherlands.
Epilepsia. 2003;44 Suppl 12:72-83. doi: 10.1111/j.0013-9580.2003.12005.x.
The occurrence of abnormal dynamics in a physiological system can become manifest as a sudden qualitative change in the behavior of characteristic physiologic variables. We assume that this is what happens in the brain with regard to epilepsy. We consider that neuronal networks involved in epilepsy possess multistable dynamics (i.e., they may display several dynamic states). To illustrate this concept, we may assume, for simplicity, that at least two states are possible: an interictal one characterized by a normal, apparently random, steady-state of ongoing activity, and another one that is characterized by the paroxysmal occurrence of a synchronous oscillations (seizure).
By using the terminology of the mathematics of nonlinear systems, we can say that such a bistable system has two attractors, to which the trajectories describing the system's output converge, depending on initial conditions and on the system's parameters. In phase-space, the basins of attraction corresponding to the two states are separated by what is called a "separatrix." We propose, schematically, that the transition between the normal ongoing and the seizure activity can take place according to three basic models: Model I: In certain epileptic brains (e.g., in absence seizures of idiopathic primary generalized epilepsies), the distance between "normal steady-state" and "paroxysmal" attractors is very small in contrast to that of a normal brain (possibly due to genetic and/or developmental factors). In the former, discrete random fluctuations of some variables can be sufficient for the occurrence of a transition to the paroxysmal state. In this case, such seizures are not predictable. Model II and model III: In other kinds of epileptic brains (e.g., limbic cortex epilepsies), the distance between "normal steady-state" and "paroxysmal" attractors is, in general, rather large, such that random fluctuations, of themselves, are commonly not capable of triggering a seizure. However, in these brains, neuronal networks have abnormal features characterized by unstable parameters that are very vulnerable to the influence of endogenous (model II) and/or exogenous (model III) factors. In these cases, these critical parameters may gradually change with time, in such a way that the attractor can deform either gradually or suddenly, with the consequence that the distance between the basin of attraction of the normal state and the separatrix tends to zero. This can lead, eventually, to a transition to a seizure.
The changes of the system's dynamics preceding a seizure in these models either may be detectable in the EEG and thus the route to the seizure may be predictable, or may be unobservable by using only measurements of the dynamical state. It is thinkable, however, that in some cases, changes in the excitability state of the underlying networks may be uncovered by using appropriate stimuli configurations before changes in the dynamics of the ongoing EEG activity are evident. A typical example of model III that we discuss here is photosensitive epilepsy.
We present an overview of these basic models, based on neurophysiologic recordings combined with signal analysis and on simulations performed by using computational models of neuronal networks. We pay especial attention to recent model studies and to novel experimental results obtained while analyzing EEG features preceding limbic seizures and during intermittent photic stimulation that precedes the transition to paroxysmal epileptic activity.
生理系统中异常动力学的出现可能表现为特征性生理变量行为的突然质变。我们假设癫痫在大脑中就是如此。我们认为,参与癫痫的神经网络具有多稳态动力学(即它们可能表现出几种动态状态)。为了说明这一概念,为简单起见,我们可以假设至少存在两种状态:一种发作间期状态,其特征是正在进行的活动处于正常、看似随机的稳态;另一种状态的特征是同步振荡(癫痫发作)的阵发性出现。
使用非线性系统数学的术语,我们可以说这样一个双稳态系统有两个吸引子,描述系统输出的轨迹会根据初始条件和系统参数收敛到这两个吸引子。在相空间中,对应于两种状态的吸引域由所谓的“分界线”分隔。我们示意性地提出,正常进行的活动与癫痫发作活动之间的转变可以根据三种基本模型发生:模型I:在某些癫痫大脑中(例如,特发性原发性全身性癫痫的失神发作),与正常大脑相比,“正常稳态”和“阵发性”吸引子之间的距离非常小(可能由于遗传和/或发育因素)。在前者中,某些变量的离散随机波动可能足以导致向阵发性状态的转变。在这种情况下,此类癫痫发作是不可预测的。模型II和模型III:在其他类型的癫痫大脑中(例如,边缘皮质癫痫),“正常稳态”和“阵发性”吸引子之间的距离通常相当大,以至于随机波动本身通常无法引发癫痫发作。然而,在这些大脑中,神经网络具有以不稳定参数为特征的异常特征,这些参数非常容易受到内源性(模型II)和/或外源性(模型III)因素的影响。在这些情况下,这些关键参数可能会随时间逐渐变化,使得吸引子可能逐渐或突然变形,结果是正常状态的吸引域与分界线之间的距离趋于零。这最终可能导致向癫痫发作的转变。
在这些模型中,癫痫发作前系统动力学的变化要么在脑电图中可检测到,因此癫痫发作的途径可能是可预测的,要么仅通过动态状态测量无法观察到。然而,可以想象,在某些情况下,在进行中的脑电图活动的动力学变化明显之前,通过使用适当的刺激配置,可能会发现潜在网络兴奋性状态的变化。我们在此讨论的模型III的一个典型例子是光敏性癫痫。
我们基于神经生理学记录结合信号分析以及使用神经网络计算模型进行的模拟,对这些基本模型进行了概述。我们特别关注最近的模型研究以及在分析边缘性癫痫发作前的脑电图特征以及向阵发性癫痫活动转变前的间歇性光刺激期间获得的新实验结果。