• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癫痫作为脑系统的动态疾病:正常与癫痫活动之间转变的基本模型

Epilepsies as dynamical diseases of brain systems: basic models of the transition between normal and epileptic activity.

作者信息

Lopes da Silva Fernando, Blanes Wouter, Kalitzin Stiliyan N, Parra Jaime, Suffczynski Piotr, Velis Demetrios N

机构信息

SEIN, Special Centre for Epilepsy in the Netherlands, Meer en Bosch, Heemstede, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Epilepsia. 2003;44 Suppl 12:72-83. doi: 10.1111/j.0013-9580.2003.12005.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.0013-9580.2003.12005.x
PMID:14641563
Abstract

PURPOSE

The occurrence of abnormal dynamics in a physiological system can become manifest as a sudden qualitative change in the behavior of characteristic physiologic variables. We assume that this is what happens in the brain with regard to epilepsy. We consider that neuronal networks involved in epilepsy possess multistable dynamics (i.e., they may display several dynamic states). To illustrate this concept, we may assume, for simplicity, that at least two states are possible: an interictal one characterized by a normal, apparently random, steady-state of ongoing activity, and another one that is characterized by the paroxysmal occurrence of a synchronous oscillations (seizure).

METHODS

By using the terminology of the mathematics of nonlinear systems, we can say that such a bistable system has two attractors, to which the trajectories describing the system's output converge, depending on initial conditions and on the system's parameters. In phase-space, the basins of attraction corresponding to the two states are separated by what is called a "separatrix." We propose, schematically, that the transition between the normal ongoing and the seizure activity can take place according to three basic models: Model I: In certain epileptic brains (e.g., in absence seizures of idiopathic primary generalized epilepsies), the distance between "normal steady-state" and "paroxysmal" attractors is very small in contrast to that of a normal brain (possibly due to genetic and/or developmental factors). In the former, discrete random fluctuations of some variables can be sufficient for the occurrence of a transition to the paroxysmal state. In this case, such seizures are not predictable. Model II and model III: In other kinds of epileptic brains (e.g., limbic cortex epilepsies), the distance between "normal steady-state" and "paroxysmal" attractors is, in general, rather large, such that random fluctuations, of themselves, are commonly not capable of triggering a seizure. However, in these brains, neuronal networks have abnormal features characterized by unstable parameters that are very vulnerable to the influence of endogenous (model II) and/or exogenous (model III) factors. In these cases, these critical parameters may gradually change with time, in such a way that the attractor can deform either gradually or suddenly, with the consequence that the distance between the basin of attraction of the normal state and the separatrix tends to zero. This can lead, eventually, to a transition to a seizure.

RESULTS

The changes of the system's dynamics preceding a seizure in these models either may be detectable in the EEG and thus the route to the seizure may be predictable, or may be unobservable by using only measurements of the dynamical state. It is thinkable, however, that in some cases, changes in the excitability state of the underlying networks may be uncovered by using appropriate stimuli configurations before changes in the dynamics of the ongoing EEG activity are evident. A typical example of model III that we discuss here is photosensitive epilepsy.

CONCLUSIONS

We present an overview of these basic models, based on neurophysiologic recordings combined with signal analysis and on simulations performed by using computational models of neuronal networks. We pay especial attention to recent model studies and to novel experimental results obtained while analyzing EEG features preceding limbic seizures and during intermittent photic stimulation that precedes the transition to paroxysmal epileptic activity.

摘要

目的

生理系统中异常动力学的出现可能表现为特征性生理变量行为的突然质变。我们假设癫痫在大脑中就是如此。我们认为,参与癫痫的神经网络具有多稳态动力学(即它们可能表现出几种动态状态)。为了说明这一概念,为简单起见,我们可以假设至少存在两种状态:一种发作间期状态,其特征是正在进行的活动处于正常、看似随机的稳态;另一种状态的特征是同步振荡(癫痫发作)的阵发性出现。

方法

使用非线性系统数学的术语,我们可以说这样一个双稳态系统有两个吸引子,描述系统输出的轨迹会根据初始条件和系统参数收敛到这两个吸引子。在相空间中,对应于两种状态的吸引域由所谓的“分界线”分隔。我们示意性地提出,正常进行的活动与癫痫发作活动之间的转变可以根据三种基本模型发生:模型I:在某些癫痫大脑中(例如,特发性原发性全身性癫痫的失神发作),与正常大脑相比,“正常稳态”和“阵发性”吸引子之间的距离非常小(可能由于遗传和/或发育因素)。在前者中,某些变量的离散随机波动可能足以导致向阵发性状态的转变。在这种情况下,此类癫痫发作是不可预测的。模型II和模型III:在其他类型的癫痫大脑中(例如,边缘皮质癫痫),“正常稳态”和“阵发性”吸引子之间的距离通常相当大,以至于随机波动本身通常无法引发癫痫发作。然而,在这些大脑中,神经网络具有以不稳定参数为特征的异常特征,这些参数非常容易受到内源性(模型II)和/或外源性(模型III)因素的影响。在这些情况下,这些关键参数可能会随时间逐渐变化,使得吸引子可能逐渐或突然变形,结果是正常状态的吸引域与分界线之间的距离趋于零。这最终可能导致向癫痫发作的转变。

结果

在这些模型中,癫痫发作前系统动力学的变化要么在脑电图中可检测到,因此癫痫发作的途径可能是可预测的,要么仅通过动态状态测量无法观察到。然而,可以想象,在某些情况下,在进行中的脑电图活动的动力学变化明显之前,通过使用适当的刺激配置,可能会发现潜在网络兴奋性状态的变化。我们在此讨论的模型III的一个典型例子是光敏性癫痫。

结论

我们基于神经生理学记录结合信号分析以及使用神经网络计算模型进行的模拟,对这些基本模型进行了概述。我们特别关注最近的模型研究以及在分析边缘性癫痫发作前的脑电图特征以及向阵发性癫痫活动转变前的间歇性光刺激期间获得的新实验结果。

相似文献

1
Epilepsies as dynamical diseases of brain systems: basic models of the transition between normal and epileptic activity.癫痫作为脑系统的动态疾病:正常与癫痫活动之间转变的基本模型
Epilepsia. 2003;44 Suppl 12:72-83. doi: 10.1111/j.0013-9580.2003.12005.x.
2
Dynamical diseases of brain systems: different routes to epileptic seizures.脑系统的动态疾病:癫痫发作的不同途径。
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2003 May;50(5):540-8. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2003.810703.
3
[Dynamic paradigm in psychopathology: "chaos theory", from physics to psychiatry].[精神病理学中的动态范式:“混沌理论”,从物理学到精神病学]
Encephale. 2001 May-Jun;27(3):260-8.
4
From cognitive networks to seizures: stimulus evoked dynamics in a coupled cortical network.从认知网络到癫痫发作:耦合皮质网络中的刺激诱发动力学。
Chaos. 2013 Dec;23(4):043111. doi: 10.1063/1.4826438.
5
Preventive and Abortive Strategies for Stimulation Based Control of Epilepsy: A Computational Model Study.基于刺激控制癫痫的预防和中止策略:一项计算模型研究
Int J Neural Syst. 2016 Dec;26(8):1650028. doi: 10.1142/S0129065716500283. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
6
Interictal to ictal transition in human temporal lobe epilepsy: insights from a computational model of intracerebral EEG.人类颞叶癫痫发作间期到发作期的转变:来自脑内脑电图计算模型的见解
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Oct;22(5):343-56.
7
Models and mechanisms of experimental epilepsies.实验性癫痫的模型与机制
Epilepsia. 2003;44 Suppl 12:44-50. doi: 10.1111/j.0013-9580.2003.12004.x.
8
Complexity evolution in epileptic seizure.癫痫发作中的复杂性演变
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2008;2008:4110-3. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2008.4650113.
9
Dynamics of local neuronal networks: control parameters and state bifurcations in epileptogenesis.局部神经网络动力学:癫痫发生中的控制参数与状态分岔
Prog Brain Res. 1994;102:359-70. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6123(08)60552-x.
10
Predicting epileptic seizures from scalp EEG based on attractor state analysis.基于吸引子状态分析从头皮脑电图预测癫痫发作
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2017 May;143:75-87. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of the spatial resolution of the Virtual Epileptic Patient on the identification of epileptogenic networks.虚拟癫痫患者空间分辨率对致痫网络识别的影响。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024 May 8;2. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00153. eCollection 2024.
2
A Nonlinear Method to Identify Seizure Dynamic Trajectory Based on Variance of Recurrence Rate in Human Epilepsy Patients Using EEG.一种基于人类癫痫患者脑电图复发率方差识别癫痫动态轨迹的非线性方法。
J Med Signals Sens. 2025 Jul 10;15:19. doi: 10.4103/jmss.jmss_73_24. eCollection 2025.
3
Association of Comorbidity and Inflammatory and Nutritional Markers with Epilepsy and Seizure Frequency.
共病以及炎症和营养标志物与癫痫及癫痫发作频率的关联
Nutrients. 2025 May 28;17(11):1847. doi: 10.3390/nu17111847.
4
Personalized preictal EEG pattern characterization: do timing and localization matter?个性化发作前脑电图模式特征分析:时间和定位重要吗?
Front Neurosci. 2025 May 2;19:1526963. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1526963. eCollection 2025.
5
Virtual epilepsy patient cohort: Generation and evaluation.虚拟癫痫患者队列:生成与评估
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 Apr 11;21(4):e1012911. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012911. eCollection 2025 Apr.
6
EEG signal dimension is an index of seizure propensity and antiseizure medication effects in a mouse model of acquired epilepsy.脑电图信号维度是后天性癫痫小鼠模型中癫痫发作倾向和抗癫痫药物疗效的一个指标。
Epilepsia. 2025 Apr 9. doi: 10.1111/epi.18397.
7
Localization of the epileptogenic network from scalp EEG using a patient-specific whole-brain model.使用患者特异性全脑模型从头皮脑电图定位致痫网络。
Netw Neurosci. 2025 Mar 3;9(1):18-37. doi: 10.1162/netn_a_00418. eCollection 2025.
8
A New Perspective in Epileptic Seizure Classification: Applying the Taxonomy of Seizure Dynamotypes to Noninvasive EEG and Examining Dynamical Changes across Sleep Stages.癫痫发作分类的新视角:将发作动态类型分类法应用于无创脑电图并研究睡眠各阶段的动态变化
eNeuro. 2025 Jan 16;12(1). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0157-24.2024. Print 2025 Jan.
9
Propagation of transient explosive synchronization in a mesoscale mouse brain network model of epilepsy.癫痫中尺度小鼠脑网络模型中瞬态爆发性同步的传播
Netw Neurosci. 2024 Oct 1;8(3):883-901. doi: 10.1162/netn_a_00379. eCollection 2024.
10
The critical dynamics of hippocampal seizures.海马体癫痫的临界动力学。
Nat Commun. 2024 Aug 13;15(1):6945. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-50504-9.