Hackstein Nils, Wiegand Cornelia, Rau Wigbert Stefan, Langheinrich Alexander Claus
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Justus-Liebig Universität Giessen, Klinikstr 36, 35385 Giessen, Germany.
Radiology. 2004 Jan;230(1):221-6. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2301021266. Epub 2003 Nov 26.
To determine the accuracy of the two-point Patlak plot in the calculation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR).
Fifty patients without acute renal disorder were included. GFR was calculated by using a two-point Patlak plot technique. The computed tomography (CT) protocol consisted of a plain examination followed by two contrast material-enhanced examinations in the arterial and portovenous phase. Each examination included the entire kidneys and was performed after injection of 120 mL iopromide and 300 mg of iodine per milliliter given per 75 kg of body weight. All examinations were performed with a standard abdominal protocol. Section thickness was 4 x 2.5 mm, and table advance was 12.5 mm. Bolus triggering commenced 10 seconds after the start of contrast medium injection. Twelve dynamic scans were obtained with reduced tube current every 3 seconds to obtain sufficient arterial input function data. Correction for hematocrit level was made by using the unenhanced attenuation of the aorta. As a reference method, plasma clearance of the contrast medium injected for CT was calculated from three iodine plasma concentration measurements obtained 3, 4, and 5 hours after injection. Linear correlation was performed.
GFR was calculated from CT data in 48 patients. Two patients were excluded because of breathing errors. Mean GFR was 80 mL/min (range, 17-153 mL/min) as measured with iopromide plasma clearance and 82 mL/min (range, 28-148 mL/min) as measured with CT. Linear correlation between the two methods was r = 0.889; GFR calculated with the two-point Patlak plot was equal to 15 plus 0.83 times GFR (plasma clearance). The mean difference between GFRs as determined with the two methods was -1.2 mL/min (95% CI: -27.1, 24.6).
Total GFR can be measured accurately with minimally extended triphasic CT in patients without acute renal disorder by using a two-point Patlak plot technique.
确定两点Patlak图在计算肾小球滤过率(GFR)中的准确性。
纳入50例无急性肾脏疾病的患者。采用两点Patlak图技术计算GFR。计算机断层扫描(CT)方案包括平扫,随后在动脉期和门静脉期进行两次对比剂增强扫描。每次扫描均包括双侧肾脏,在每75kg体重注射120mL碘普罗胺(每毫升含300mg碘)后进行。所有扫描均采用标准腹部扫描方案。层厚为4×2.5mm,床进为12.5mm。在对比剂注射开始10秒后启动团注触发。每隔3秒进行12次低管电流动态扫描,以获取足够的动脉输入函数数据。通过主动脉平扫衰减对血细胞比容水平进行校正。作为参考方法,根据注射后3、4和5小时获得的三次碘血浆浓度测量值计算CT注射对比剂的血浆清除率。进行线性相关分析。
48例患者根据CT数据计算GFR。2例患者因呼吸错误被排除。碘普罗胺血浆清除率测得的平均GFR为80mL/min(范围17 - 153mL/min),CT测得的平均GFR为82mL/min(范围28 - 148mL/min)。两种方法之间的线性相关系数r = 0.889;用两点Patlak图计算的GFR等于15加上0.83倍的GFR(血浆清除率)。两种方法测定的GFR平均差异为 - 1.2mL/min(95%CI: - 27.1,24.6)。
对于无急性肾脏疾病患者,采用两点Patlak图技术通过最小程度延长的三相CT能够准确测量总GFR。