Suppr超能文献

应用 CT 尿路造影与肾动态成像门控法测定单肾肾小球滤过率(GFR)。

Determination of single-kidney glomerular filtration rate (GFR) with CT urography versus renal dynamic imaging Gates method.

机构信息

Department of Graduate, Hebei North University, 11 Diamond South Road, High-tech Zone, Zhangjiakou City, Hebei Province, 075000, People's Republic of China.

Department of Radiology, Qiqihar Chinese Medicine Hospital, 23 Ping An Nan Jie, Tiefeng District, Qigihar City, Heilongjiang Province, 161005, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2018 Mar;28(3):1077-1084. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5061-z. Epub 2017 Oct 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To present a single-kidney CT-GFR measurement and compare it with the renal dynamic imaging Gates-GFR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-six patients with hydronephrosis referred for CT urography and 99mTc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging were prospectively included. Informed consent was obtained from all patients. The CT urography protocol included non-contrast, nephrographic, and excretory phase imaging. The total CT-GFR was calculated by dividing the CT number increments of the total urinary system between the nephrographic and excretory phase by the products of iodine concentration in the aorta and the elapsed time, then multiplied by (1- Haematocrit). The total CT-GFR was then split into single-kidney CT-GFR by a left and right kidney proportionality factor. The results were compared with single-kidney Gates-GFR by using paired t-test, correlation analysis, and Bland-Altman plots.

RESULTS

Paired difference between single-kidney CT-GFR (45.02 ± 13.91) and single-kidney Gates-GFR (51.21 ± 14.76) was 6.19 ± 5.63 ml/min, p<0.001, demonstrating 12.1% systematic underestimation with ±11.03 ml/min (±21.5%) measurement deviation. A good correlation was revealed between both measurements (r=0.87, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The proposed single-kidney CT-GFR correlates and agrees well with the reference standard despite a systematic underestimation, therefore it could be a one-stop-shop for evaluating urinary tract morphology and split renal function.

KEY POINTS

• A new CT method can assess split renal function • Only using images from CT urography and the value of haematocrit • A one-stop-shop CT technique without additional radiation dose.

摘要

目的

介绍一种单肾 CT-GFR 测量方法,并将其与肾动态成像 Gates-GFR 进行比较。

材料与方法

前瞻性纳入 36 例因肾积水而行 CT 尿路造影和 99mTc-DTPA 肾动态成像的患者。所有患者均获得知情同意。CT 尿路造影方案包括非对比、肾实质期和排泄期成像。总 CT-GFR 通过将肾实质期和排泄期之间的整个泌尿系统的 CT 数增加除以主动脉碘浓度与时间的乘积,然后乘以(1-红细胞压积)来计算。然后通过左、右肾比例系数将总 CT-GFR 分为单肾 CT-GFR。通过配对 t 检验、相关分析和 Bland-Altman 图比较单肾 CT-GFR 和单肾 Gates-GFR。

结果

单肾 CT-GFR(45.02±13.91)与单肾 Gates-GFR(51.21±14.76)的配对差值为 6.19±5.63ml/min,p<0.001,表明存在 12.1%的系统低估和±11.03ml/min(±21.5%)的测量偏差。两种测量方法相关性良好(r=0.87,p<0.001)。

结论

尽管存在系统低估,但所提出的单肾 CT-GFR 与参考标准具有相关性和良好的一致性,因此它可以成为评估尿路形态和分肾功能的一站式方法。

关键要点

• 一种新的 CT 方法可以评估分肾功能;• 仅使用 CT 尿路造影的图像和红细胞压积的值;• 一种无需额外辐射剂量的一站式 CT 技术。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验