Rubin David C, Schrauf Robert W, Greenberg Daniel L
Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Mem Cognit. 2003 Sep;31(6):887-901. doi: 10.3758/bf03196443.
In three experiments, undergraduates rated autobiographical memories on scales derived from existing theories of memory. In multiple regression analyses, ratings of the degree to which subjects recollected (i.e., relived) their memories were predicted by visual imagery, auditory imagery, and emotions, whereas ratings of belief in the accuracy of their memories were predicted by knowledge of the setting. Recollection was predicted equally well in between- and within-subjects analyses, but belief consistently had smaller correlations and multiple regression predictions between subjects; individual differences in the cognitive scales that we measured could not account well for individual differences in belief. In contrast, measures of mood (Beck Depression Index) and dissociation (Dissociative Experience Scale) added predictive value for belief, but not for recollection. We also found that highly relived memories almost always had strong visual images and that remember/know judgments made on autobiographical memories were more closely related to belief than to recollection.
在三项实验中,大学生根据源自现有记忆理论的量表对自传体记忆进行评分。在多元回归分析中,被试对记忆的回忆程度(即重新体验)的评分可由视觉意象、听觉意象和情感预测,而他们对记忆准确性的信念评分则由对情境的了解来预测。在组间分析和组内分析中,回忆的预测效果同样良好,但信念在组间的相关性和多元回归预测始终较小;我们所测量的认知量表中的个体差异并不能很好地解释信念方面的个体差异。相比之下,情绪测量(贝克抑郁量表)和解离测量(解离体验量表)增加了对信念的预测价值,但对回忆没有影响。我们还发现,高度重新体验的记忆几乎总是有强烈的视觉意象,并且对自传体记忆做出的记得/知道判断与信念的关系比对回忆的关系更密切。