• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲预防吸烟框架方法(ESFA):短期影响

The European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach (ESFA): short-term effects.

作者信息

de Vries Hein, Mudde Aart, Kremers Stef, Wetzels Joyce, Uiters Ellen, Ariza Carles, Vitória Paulo Duarte, Fielder Anne, Holm Klavs, Janssen Karin, Lehtuvuori Riku, Candel Math

机构信息

Department of Health Education, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Health Educ Res. 2003 Dec;18(6):649-63; discussion 664-77. doi: 10.1093/her/cyg033.

DOI:10.1093/her/cyg033
PMID:14654499
Abstract

The European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach (ESFA) resulted in a smoking prevention project for six European countries. It included activities on four levels: adolescents, schools, parents and out-of-school activities. Common goals and objectives were developed, but countries were also able to include additional objectives. National diversities required country-specific methods. The most important common element was a school-based programme consisting of at least five lessons paying attention to social influence processes and training in refusal skills. During the first year, significantly more smoking prevention activities were realized in experimental schools compared with control schools. Not all countries had the same number of lessons on resisting peer pressures. Significant cognitive changes were observed in Spain, resulting in more negative attitudes, increased self-efficacy levels and a more negative intention towards smoking in the experimental group. Counter-productive cognitive effects were observed in the UK. Significantly less onset of weekly smoking in experimental groups was found in Finland (4.7%) and Spain (3.1%). Counter-productive effects were observed in Denmark and the UK. In conclusion, while having common objectives, the ESFA approach allowed for a great deal of diversity. Fundamental research using dismantling designs is needed to be able to detect the most effective elements of smoking prevention programmes for different age groups. Attention to parenting styles and practices is also needed.

摘要

欧洲预防吸烟框架方法(ESFA)促成了一个面向六个欧洲国家的预防吸烟项目。该项目包括四个层面的活动:青少年、学校、家长及校外活动。项目制定了共同的目标,但各国也能够纳入额外的目标。由于存在国家差异,需要采用针对各国具体情况的方法。最重要的共同要素是一个校本课程,该课程至少包含五节课,关注社会影响过程并开展拒绝技巧培训。在第一年,与对照学校相比,实验学校开展了显著更多的预防吸烟活动。并非所有国家在抵制同伴压力方面的课程数量都相同。在西班牙观察到了显著的认知变化,实验组中出现了更多负面态度、自我效能水平提高以及对吸烟更负面的意向。在英国观察到了适得其反的认知效果。在芬兰(4.7%)和西班牙(3.1%),实验组中每周吸烟的开始率显著更低。在丹麦和英国观察到了适得其反的效果。总之,虽然有共同目标,但ESFA方法允许存在很大差异。需要开展采用拆解设计的基础研究,以便能够找出针对不同年龄组的预防吸烟项目的最有效要素。还需要关注育儿方式和做法。

相似文献

1
The European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach (ESFA): short-term effects.欧洲预防吸烟框架方法(ESFA):短期影响
Health Educ Res. 2003 Dec;18(6):649-63; discussion 664-77. doi: 10.1093/her/cyg033.
2
The effects of a three-year smoking prevention programme in secondary schools in Helsinki.赫尔辛基中学一项为期三年的吸烟预防计划的效果。
Eur J Public Health. 2007 Jun;17(3):249-56. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckl107. Epub 2007 Jan 5.
3
The European Smoking prevention Framework Approach (ESFA): effects after 24 and 30 months.欧洲预防吸烟框架方法(ESFA):24个月和30个月后的效果。
Health Educ Res. 2006 Feb;21(1):116-32. doi: 10.1093/her/cyh048. Epub 2005 Aug 8.
4
The European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach (EFSA): an example of integral prevention.欧洲预防吸烟框架方法(EFSA):综合预防的一个范例。
Health Educ Res. 2003 Oct;18(5):611-26. doi: 10.1093/her/cyg031.
5
Why do Danish adolescents take up smoking?为什么丹麦青少年会开始吸烟?
Eur J Public Health. 2003 Mar;13(1):67-74. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/13.1.67.
6
Are anti-smoking parenting practices related to adolescent smoking cognitions and behavior?反吸烟育儿方式与青少年吸烟认知及行为有关吗?
Health Educ Res. 2006 Feb;21(1):66-77. doi: 10.1093/her/cyh045. Epub 2005 Jul 6.
7
Mediated, moderated and direct effects of country of residence, age, and gender on the cognitive and social determinants of adolescent smoking in Spain and the UK: a cross-sectional study.居住国、年龄和性别对西班牙和英国青少年吸烟认知及社会决定因素的中介效应、调节效应和直接效应:一项横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2009 Jun 4;9:173. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-173.
8
Challenges to the peer influence paradigm: results for 12-13 year olds from six European countries from the European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach study.同伴影响范式面临的挑战:来自欧洲吸烟预防框架方法研究中六个欧洲国家12至13岁青少年的研究结果
Tob Control. 2006 Apr;15(2):83-9. doi: 10.1136/tc.2003.007237.
9
Longitudinal effects of the European smoking prevention framework approach (ESFA) project in Spanish adolescents.欧洲预防吸烟框架方法(ESFA)项目对西班牙青少年的纵向影响。
Eur J Public Health. 2008 Oct;18(5):491-7. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckn050. Epub 2008 Jun 18.
10
Smoking trends in adolescence: report on a Greek school-based, peer-led intervention aimed at prevention.青少年吸烟趋势:关于一项以希腊学校为基础、由同伴主导的预防干预措施的报告。
Health Promot Int. 2001 Mar;16(1):65-72. doi: 10.1093/heapro/16.1.65.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence and Gap Map of Whole-School Interventions Promoting Mental Health and Preventing Risk Behaviours in Adolescence: Programme Component Mapping Within the Health-Promoting Schools Framework: An evidence and gap map.促进青少年心理健康和预防风险行为的全学校干预措施的证据与差距图:健康促进学校框架内的计划组成部分映射:一份证据与差距图。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 10;21(1):e70024. doi: 10.1002/cl2.70024. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Effectiveness of Whole-school Interventions Promoting Mental Health and Preventing Risk Behaviours in Adolescence.促进青少年心理健康和预防风险行为的全校干预措施有效性的系统评价与荟萃分析
J Youth Adolesc. 2025 Feb;54(2):271-289. doi: 10.1007/s10964-025-02135-6. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
3
Self-management support from health care providers in Shared Medical Appointments: Didactic techniques, peer learning, group dynamics and motivation.共享医疗预约中医疗服务提供者的自我管理支持:教学技巧、同伴学习、群体动态与动机
PEC Innov. 2024 Aug 23;5:100337. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100337. eCollection 2024 Dec 15.
4
Prevention of tobacco use in an adolescent population through a multi-personal intervention model.通过多人员干预模式预防青少年人群中的烟草使用。
Tob Prev Cessat. 2023 Dec 18;9:37. doi: 10.18332/tpc/175065. eCollection 2023.
5
Characteristics of tobacco use among secondary school students: a cross-sectional study in a school in Valencia, Spain.中学生烟草使用特点:西班牙巴伦西亚一所学校的横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 May 3;11:1069294. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1069294. eCollection 2023.
6
Adolescents' Perceptions and Attitudes towards Traditional and Electronic Cigarettes-Results of Focus Group Interviews.青少年对传统香烟和电子烟的认知和态度——焦点小组访谈的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 12;20(2):1438. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021438.
7
Message Frame-Tailoring in Digital Health Communication: Intervention Redesign and Usability Testing.数字健康通信中的信息框架定制:干预措施重新设计与可用性测试。
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Apr 21;6(4):e33886. doi: 10.2196/33886.
8
Towards a better understanding of factors affecting smoking uptake among Saudi male adolescents: A qualitative study.为更好地理解影响沙特男性青少年吸烟行为的因素:一项定性研究。
Tob Prev Cessat. 2020 May 15;6:29. doi: 10.18332/tpc/120000. eCollection 2020.
9
School policies for preventing smoking among young people.学校预防青少年吸烟的政策。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 24;2014(10):CD009990. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009990.pub2.
10
Determinants of waterpipe smoking initiation among school children in Irbid, Jordan: a 4-year longitudinal analysis.约旦伊尔比德学童开始吸食水烟的决定因素:一项为期4年的纵向分析。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Sep 1;142:307-13. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.06.038. Epub 2014 Jul 9.