Suppr超能文献

成人疑似阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停调查中使用便携式监测设备的实践参数。

Practice parameters for the use of portable monitoring devices in the investigation of suspected obstructive sleep apnea in adults.

作者信息

Chesson Andrew L, Berry Richard B, Pack Allan

机构信息

Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA.

出版信息

Sleep. 2003 Nov 1;26(7):907-13. doi: 10.1093/sleep/26.7.907.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A variety of devices are used to evaluate patients with a potential diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). A committee comprised of members of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, American Thoracic Society, and American College of Chest Physicians systematically evaluated data on the use of these devices and developed practice parameters.

DEVICES REVIEWED

Three categories of portable monitoring (PM) devices were reviewed with regard to assessing the probability of identifying an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of greater or less than 15 in attended and unattended settings. Type 2 (minimum of seven channels, including EEG, EOG, chin EMG, ECG or heart rate, airflow, respiratory effort, oxygen saturation), Type 3 (minimum of four channels, including ventilation or airflow (at least two channels of respiratory movement, or respiratory movement and airflow), heart rate or ECG and oxygen saturation) and Type 4 (most monitors of this type measure a single parameter or two parameters) devices were evaluated, and in-laboratory, attended polysomnography was used as a reference.

SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS

(1) Insufficient evidence is available to recommend the use of Type 2 PM devices in attended or unattended settings. (2) Type 3 PM devices appear to be capable of being used in an attended setting to increase or to decrease the probability that a patient has an apnea-hypopnea index greater than 15. (3) The use of Type 3 PM devices in an unattended setting is not recommended to rule in, rule out, or both rule in and rule out a diagnosis of OSA. (4) There is some evidence that the use of Type 3 PM devices in an attended in-laboratory setting may be acceptable to both rule in and rule out a diagnosis of OSA if certain limitations are in place. These limitations include manually scoring the records, using the devices only in patients without significant comorbid conditions, having an awareness that symptomatic patients with a negative study should have a Type 1 study, and not using these devices for titrating positive airway pressure or conducting split-night studies. (5) The use of Type 4 PM devices in attended or unattended settings is not recommended.

GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS

Type 3 and 4 PM devices cannot score sleep and, therefore, do not meet some current Medicare guidelines. The use of PM devices is not recommended for general-population screening or in the absence of a pretest probability of the patient having a diagnosis of OSA, for complaints other than those associated with OSA, without review of raw data during interpretation, by physicians without familiarity with their use and limitations, and without trained personnel to perform technical scoring. Future research should address the use of PM devices in patients with comorbid conditions; non-White patients and women; larger, better-controlled studies; studies focused on the use of Type 2 and 3 devices; studies focusing on decision making and outcomes rather than simple classification using arbitrary cutoffs; and studies that seek to elucidate cost-effectiveness data on the use of PM devices.

摘要

背景

多种设备用于评估可能患有阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的患者。一个由美国睡眠医学学会、美国胸科学会和美国胸科医师学会成员组成的委员会系统地评估了这些设备使用的数据,并制定了实践参数。

审查的设备

对三类便携式监测(PM)设备进行了审查,以评估在有医护人员在场和无医护人员在场的情况下识别呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)大于或小于15的可能性。对2型(至少七个通道,包括脑电图、眼电图、颏肌电图、心电图或心率、气流、呼吸努力、血氧饱和度)、3型(至少四个通道,包括通气或气流(至少两个呼吸运动通道,或呼吸运动和气流)、心率或心电图以及血氧饱和度)和4型(此类大多数监测仪测量一个参数或两个参数)设备进行了评估,并将实验室中有医护人员在场的多导睡眠图用作参考。

具体建议

(1)没有足够证据推荐在有医护人员在场或无医护人员在场的情况下使用2型PM设备。(2)3型PM设备似乎能够在有医护人员在场的情况下使用,以增加或降低患者呼吸暂停低通气指数大于15的可能性。(3)不建议在无医护人员在场的情况下使用3型PM设备来确诊、排除或同时确诊和排除OSA诊断。(4)有一些证据表明,如果存在某些限制,在实验室中有医护人员在场的情况下使用3型PM设备来确诊和排除OSA诊断可能是可以接受的。这些限制包括手动对记录进行评分,仅在没有严重合并症的患者中使用这些设备,意识到症状性患者检查结果为阴性时应进行1型检查,以及不使用这些设备来滴定气道正压或进行分夜研究。(5)不建议在有医护人员在场或无医护人员在场的情况下使用4型PM设备。

一般建议

3型和4型PM设备无法对睡眠进行评分,因此不符合当前一些医疗保险指南。不建议在一般人群筛查中使用PM设备,或在患者没有OSA诊断的预测试概率、除与OSA相关的主诉外的其他主诉、解读期间不审查原始数据、由不熟悉其使用和局限性的医生以及没有经过培训的人员进行技术评分的情况下使用PM设备。未来的研究应关注PM设备在合并症患者、非白人患者和女性中的使用;规模更大、控制更好的研究;专注于2型和3型设备使用的研究;专注于决策制定和结果而非使用任意临界值进行简单分类的研究;以及旨在阐明使用PM设备的成本效益数据的研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验