Nelson M, Ruch S, Jackson Z, Bloom L, Part R
Social Work Department, Rehabilitation Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Soc Work Health Care. 1992;17(4):1-25. doi: 10.1300/J010v17n04_01.
This exploratory study examined the family environment of ten families, each with a physically disabled adolescent and at least one non-disabled adolescent. Family members completed the Moos Family Environment Scale (FES) and discussed with the interviewer their experiences as a family. Blind and independent ratings on the FES by social workers involved in the study provided a comparison with the families' self ratings. Family ratings on the FES gave no indication of distress, but showed slightly higher than average emphasis on cohesion and achievement orientation. Social work ratings, in contrast, indicated elevated levels of conflict, achievement orientation, and control. In this report, no attempt is made to generalize these specific findings to all families with disabled adolescents. Rather, results are interpreted, in the light of findings in the recent literature, to underscore the need for better designed research and to alert professionals to the danger of imposing the prevalent dysfunctional view upon families with disabled children and adolescents.
这项探索性研究调查了十个家庭的家庭环境,每个家庭都有一名身体残疾的青少年和至少一名非残疾青少年。家庭成员完成了莫斯家庭环境量表(FES),并与访谈者讨论了他们作为一个家庭的经历。参与该研究的社会工作者对FES进行的盲评和独立评分,与家庭的自评进行了比较。家庭对FES的评分没有显示出困扰,但显示出对凝聚力和成就取向的强调略高于平均水平。相比之下,社会工作者的评分表明冲突、成就取向和控制水平较高。在本报告中,并未试图将这些具体发现推广到所有有残疾青少年的家庭。相反,根据近期文献中的研究结果对结果进行了解释,以强调进行更精心设计研究的必要性,并提醒专业人员注意将普遍存在的功能失调观点强加于有残疾儿童和青少年家庭的危险性。