Schützwohl Matthias, Jarosz-Nowak Joanna, Briscoe Jane, Szajowski Krzysztof, Kallert Thomas
Department of Psychiatry at Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2003;12(4):197-207. doi: 10.1002/mpr.157.
The objectives of this study were to report the inter-rater reliability of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS 4.0) and the Groningen Social Disabilities Schedule (GSDS-II) as assessed in a randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of psychiatric day hospitals spanning five sites in countries of Central and Western Europe. Following brief training sessions, videotaped BPRS-interviews and written GSDS-vignettes were rated by clinically experienced researchers from all participating sites. Inter-rater reliability often proved to be poor for items assessing the severity of both psychopathology and social dysfunction, but findings suggest that both instruments allow for the assessment of the presence or absence of specific psychopathological symptoms or social disabilities. Inter-rater reliability at subscale level proved to be good for both instruments. Results indicate that, with a brief training session and proper use of the instruments, psychopathology and social disabilities can be reliably assessed within cross-national research studies. The results are of particular interest given that the need to conduct cross-national multi-site studies including countries with different cultural backgrounds increases.
本研究的目的是报告在一项关于精神科日间医院有效性的随机对照试验中,对简明精神病评定量表(BPRS 4.0)和格罗宁根社会残疾评定量表(GSDS-II)进行评估时的评分者间信度。该试验在中欧和西欧国家的五个地点开展。经过简短的培训课程后,来自所有参与地点的临床经验丰富的研究人员对BPRS访谈录像和GSDS书面 vignettes进行了评分。对于评估精神病理学和社会功能障碍严重程度的项目,评分者间信度往往较差,但研究结果表明,这两种工具都能够评估特定精神病理症状或社会残疾的存在与否。在分量表层面,两种工具的评分者间信度都被证明是良好的。结果表明,通过简短的培训课程和正确使用这些工具,可以在跨国研究中可靠地评估精神病理学和社会残疾情况。鉴于开展包括不同文化背景国家的跨国多地点研究的需求不断增加,这些结果尤其令人关注。