• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

果蝇基因5'调控区域正负选择的推断

Inference of positive and negative selection on the 5' regulatory regions of Drosophila genes.

作者信息

Kohn Michael H, Fang Shu, Wu Chung-I

机构信息

Department of Ecology & Evolution, The University of Chicago, USA.

出版信息

Mol Biol Evol. 2004 Feb;21(2):374-83. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msh026. Epub 2003 Dec 5.

DOI:10.1093/molbev/msh026
PMID:14660692
Abstract

Both positive selection and negative selection have been shown to drive the evolution of coding regions. It is of interest to know if the corresponding 5' regions of genes may be subjected to selection of comparable intensities. For such a comparison, we chose the Accessory gland protein (Acp) genes as our test case. About 700 bp and 600 bp for the 5' and coding regions, respectively, of eight previously unstudied genes were sequenced from 21 isogenic lines of D. melanogaster and one line from D. simulans. The ratio of divergence at the amino-acid replacement sites (A) over that at the synonymous sites (S) was twice the ratio for common polymorphism. Interestingly, the 5' region shows the same trend, with the 5'/S divergence ratio being 1.8 times higher than the 5'/S ratio for common polymorphism. There are several possible explanations for the 5'/S ratios, including demography, negative selection, and positive selection. Under normal conditions, positive selection is the most likely explanation. If that is true, about 45 to 50 percent of all fixed differences at both the replacement and 5' sites were adaptive, even though the substitution rate in the former is only half that of the latter (K(A)/K(S) approximately 0.3 vs. K(5')/K(S) approximately 0.6). As previous analyses have indicated, the inclusion of slightly deleterious polymorphism confounds the inference of positive selection. The analysis of published polymorphism data covering 97 verified 5' regions of Drosophila suggests more pronounced selective constraint on the 5' untranslated region and the core promoter (together corresponding to approximately 200 bp in this data set) when compared to the more distal portion of the 5' region of genes.

摘要

正选择和负选择均已被证明可推动编码区的进化。了解基因相应的5'区域是否可能受到强度相当的选择作用,这一点很有意思。为了进行这样的比较,我们选择了副腺蛋白(Acp)基因作为测试对象。从21个黑腹果蝇同基因系和1个拟果蝇品系中,分别对8个此前未研究过的基因的5'区域(约700 bp)和编码区(约600 bp)进行了测序。氨基酸替换位点(A)处的分歧与同义位点(S)处的分歧之比,是常见多态性分歧之比的两倍。有趣的是,5'区域呈现出相同的趋势,5'/S分歧比是常见多态性5'/S比的1.8倍。对于5'/S比,有几种可能的解释,包括种群统计学、负选择和正选择。在正常情况下,正选择是最有可能的解释。如果真是这样,那么在替换位点和5'位点的所有固定差异中,约45%至50%是适应性的,尽管前者的替换率仅为后者的一半(K(A)/K(S)约为0.3,而K(5')/K(S)约为0.6)。正如先前的分析所表明的,纳入轻微有害的多态性会混淆正选择的推断。对涵盖果蝇97个已验证5'区域的已发表多态性数据的分析表明,与基因5'区域的更远端部分相比,5'非翻译区和核心启动子(在该数据集中总共约200 bp)受到更明显的选择限制。

相似文献

1
Inference of positive and negative selection on the 5' regulatory regions of Drosophila genes.果蝇基因5'调控区域正负选择的推断
Mol Biol Evol. 2004 Feb;21(2):374-83. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msh026. Epub 2003 Dec 5.
2
Adaptive protein evolution and regulatory divergence in Drosophila.果蝇中的适应性蛋白质进化与调控差异
Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Jun;23(6):1101-3. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msk002. Epub 2006 Mar 14.
3
The influence of demography and weak selection on the McDonald-Kreitman test: an empirical study in Drosophila.人口统计学和弱选择对麦克唐纳-克赖特曼检验的影响:果蝇的实证研究
Mol Biol Evol. 2009 Mar;26(3):691-8. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msn297. Epub 2009 Jan 6.
4
Molecular evolution and population genetics of duplicated accessory gland protein genes in Drosophila.果蝇中重复的附属腺蛋白基因的分子进化与群体遗传学
Mol Biol Evol. 2004 Sep;21(9):1625-8. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msh195. Epub 2004 Jun 23.
5
Identifying signatures of selection at the enhancer of split neurogenic gene complex in Drosophila.在果蝇中鉴定分节神经原基因复合体增强子处的选择特征。
Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Mar;22(3):607-19. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msi046. Epub 2004 Nov 10.
6
Adaptive evolution of non-coding DNA in Drosophila.果蝇中非编码DNA的适应性进化。
Nature. 2005 Oct 20;437(7062):1149-52. doi: 10.1038/nature04107.
7
Intragenic Hill-Robertson interference influences selection intensity on synonymous mutations in Drosophila.基因内的希尔-罗伯逊干扰影响果蝇同义突变的选择强度。
Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Dec;22(12):2519-30. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msi246. Epub 2005 Aug 24.
8
Molecular population genetics of male accessory gland proteins in the Drosophila simulans complex.拟果蝇复合体中雄性附腺蛋白的分子群体遗传学
Genetics. 2004 Jun;167(2):725-35. doi: 10.1534/genetics.103.020883.
9
Excess of amino acid substitutions relative to polymorphism between X-linked duplications in Drosophila melanogaster.黑腹果蝇X连锁重复中氨基酸替换相对于多态性的过量情况。
Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Feb;22(2):273-84. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msi015. Epub 2004 Oct 13.
10
Variation in synonymous codon use and DNA polymorphism within the Drosophila genome.果蝇基因组内同义密码子使用的变异与DNA多态性
J Evol Biol. 2006 Jan;19(1):1-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00996.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The evolution and mutational robustness of chromatin accessibility in Drosophila.果蝇染色质可及性的进化和突变鲁棒性。
Genome Biol. 2023 Oct 16;24(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s13059-023-03079-5.
2
Gene regulation underlies environmental adaptation in house mice.基因调控是家鼠适应环境的基础。
Genome Res. 2018 Nov;28(11):1636-1645. doi: 10.1101/gr.238998.118. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
3
The Neutral Theory in Light of Natural Selection.自然选择视角下的中性理论。
Mol Biol Evol. 2018 Jun 1;35(6):1366-1371. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy092.
4
Natural Selection Drives Rapid Functional Evolution of Young Drosophila Duplicate Genes.自然选择驱动年轻果蝇重复基因的快速功能进化。
Mol Biol Evol. 2017 Dec 1;34(12):3089-3098. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx230.
5
Paralog analyses reveal gene duplication events and genes under positive selection in Ixodes scapularis and other ixodid ticks.旁系同源分析揭示了肩突硬蜱和其他硬蜱科蜱类中的基因复制事件以及正选择下的基因。
BMC Genomics. 2016 Mar 16;17:241. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-2350-2.
6
Detecting selection in the blue crab, Callinectes sapidus, using DNA sequence data from multiple nuclear protein-coding genes.利用来自多个核蛋白编码基因的DNA序列数据检测青蟹(Callinectes sapidus)中的选择作用。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 4;9(6):e99081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099081. eCollection 2014.
7
A selection index for gene expression evolution and its application to the divergence between humans and chimpanzees.基因表达进化选择指数及其在人类和黑猩猩分化研究中的应用。
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034935. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
8
Methods to detect selection on noncoding DNA.检测非编码DNA选择的方法。
Methods Mol Biol. 2012;856:141-59. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-585-5_6.
9
Evolution of a membrane protein regulon in Saccharomyces.酵母膜蛋白调控网络的进化。
Mol Biol Evol. 2012 Jul;29(7):1747-56. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mss017. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
10
Evidence that purifying selection acts on promoter sequences.证据表明,纯化选择作用于启动子序列。
Genetics. 2011 Nov;189(3):1121-6. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.133637. Epub 2011 Sep 6.