Kohn Michael H, Fang Shu, Wu Chung-I
Department of Ecology & Evolution, The University of Chicago, USA.
Mol Biol Evol. 2004 Feb;21(2):374-83. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msh026. Epub 2003 Dec 5.
Both positive selection and negative selection have been shown to drive the evolution of coding regions. It is of interest to know if the corresponding 5' regions of genes may be subjected to selection of comparable intensities. For such a comparison, we chose the Accessory gland protein (Acp) genes as our test case. About 700 bp and 600 bp for the 5' and coding regions, respectively, of eight previously unstudied genes were sequenced from 21 isogenic lines of D. melanogaster and one line from D. simulans. The ratio of divergence at the amino-acid replacement sites (A) over that at the synonymous sites (S) was twice the ratio for common polymorphism. Interestingly, the 5' region shows the same trend, with the 5'/S divergence ratio being 1.8 times higher than the 5'/S ratio for common polymorphism. There are several possible explanations for the 5'/S ratios, including demography, negative selection, and positive selection. Under normal conditions, positive selection is the most likely explanation. If that is true, about 45 to 50 percent of all fixed differences at both the replacement and 5' sites were adaptive, even though the substitution rate in the former is only half that of the latter (K(A)/K(S) approximately 0.3 vs. K(5')/K(S) approximately 0.6). As previous analyses have indicated, the inclusion of slightly deleterious polymorphism confounds the inference of positive selection. The analysis of published polymorphism data covering 97 verified 5' regions of Drosophila suggests more pronounced selective constraint on the 5' untranslated region and the core promoter (together corresponding to approximately 200 bp in this data set) when compared to the more distal portion of the 5' region of genes.
正选择和负选择均已被证明可推动编码区的进化。了解基因相应的5'区域是否可能受到强度相当的选择作用,这一点很有意思。为了进行这样的比较,我们选择了副腺蛋白(Acp)基因作为测试对象。从21个黑腹果蝇同基因系和1个拟果蝇品系中,分别对8个此前未研究过的基因的5'区域(约700 bp)和编码区(约600 bp)进行了测序。氨基酸替换位点(A)处的分歧与同义位点(S)处的分歧之比,是常见多态性分歧之比的两倍。有趣的是,5'区域呈现出相同的趋势,5'/S分歧比是常见多态性5'/S比的1.8倍。对于5'/S比,有几种可能的解释,包括种群统计学、负选择和正选择。在正常情况下,正选择是最有可能的解释。如果真是这样,那么在替换位点和5'位点的所有固定差异中,约45%至50%是适应性的,尽管前者的替换率仅为后者的一半(K(A)/K(S)约为0.3,而K(5')/K(S)约为0.6)。正如先前的分析所表明的,纳入轻微有害的多态性会混淆正选择的推断。对涵盖果蝇97个已验证5'区域的已发表多态性数据的分析表明,与基因5'区域的更远端部分相比,5'非翻译区和核心启动子(在该数据集中总共约200 bp)受到更明显的选择限制。