Suppr超能文献

[急性阑尾炎——开腹手术还是腹腔镜手术?]

[Acute appendicitis--open or laparoscopic surgery?].

作者信息

Strzałka Marcin, Bobrzyński Andrzej, Budzyński Andrzej, Biesiada Zbigniew, Rembiasz Kazimierz

机构信息

II Katedra Chirurgii Ogólnej Collegium Medicum Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 31-501 Kraków, ul. Kopernika 21.

出版信息

Przegl Lek. 2003;60 Suppl 7:70-4.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Laparoscopy is used more and more frequently in the treatment of abdominal emergencies including acute appendicitis. This technique has a lot of advantages especially in the group of the young female patients, where the differential diagnosis between gynecological diseases and appendicitis is difficult.

AIM OF THE STUDY

The study is designed to compare the results of open and laparoscopic exploration in patients with suspected appendicitis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From 1998-2001 we performed 278 operations for suspicion of appendicitis in the 2nd Dept. of Surgery of the Jagiellonian University. There were 127 laparoscopic procedures performed in 46 men and 81 women (mean age 28.6 years) and 151 classical exploration in 99 men and 52 women (mean age 37.9 years). We reviewed retrospectively the patients' data analysing age, sex, duration of the procedure, length of the hospital stay, intraoperative and postoperative complication rate.

RESULTS

The patients operated classically were older than patients operated laparoscopically. The proportion of male and female patients was reversed in both types of exploration. The female patients composed a majority (2/3) in the case of laparoscopic procedures and minority (1/3) in the case of open operations. The average duration of open appendectomy was 43 min. as compared with 49 min. of laparoscopic procedure, which was however getting shorter in the analysed period. The mean length of the hospital stay was twice shorter after laparoscopic appendectomy (4.8 days vs 8.4 days). There were only 4 (3.15%) complications connected with laparoscopic technique and 34 (22.52%) complications after open appendectomy. There were 12 (9.45%) conversions, most of them in patients with the retrocoecal position of the appendix. The diagnosis of acute appendicitis was confirmed in similar percentage in both operation types (laparoscopy--78.74%, open technique--79.47%). There were also similar proportions of the patients with no macroscopical changes in the appendix and with other abdominal diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopy allows for the precise diagnosis and final treatment in most patients with the suspected acute appendicitis. Some patients also avoid laparotomy. Hospital stay is significantly shorter and complication rate is markedly lower among patients operated laparoscopically.

摘要

未标注

腹腔镜检查在包括急性阑尾炎在内的腹部急症治疗中应用越来越频繁。这项技术有很多优点,尤其在年轻女性患者群体中,妇科疾病和阑尾炎的鉴别诊断较为困难。

研究目的

本研究旨在比较疑似阑尾炎患者行开腹探查和腹腔镜探查的结果。

材料与方法

1998年至2001年,我们在雅盖隆大学第二外科对278例疑似阑尾炎患者进行了手术。其中46例男性和81例女性(平均年龄28.6岁)接受了127例腹腔镜手术,99例男性和52例女性(平均年龄37.9岁)接受了151例传统探查。我们回顾性分析了患者的数据,包括年龄、性别、手术时长、住院时间、术中及术后并发症发生率。

结果

接受传统手术的患者比接受腹腔镜手术的患者年龄更大。两种探查方式中男女患者比例相反。女性患者在腹腔镜手术组中占多数(2/3),而在开腹手术组中占少数(1/3)。开腹阑尾切除术的平均时长为43分钟,而腹腔镜手术为49分钟,不过在分析期间腹腔镜手术时长在缩短。腹腔镜阑尾切除术后的平均住院时间缩短了一半(4.8天对8.4天)。腹腔镜技术相关的并发症仅有4例(3.15%),开腹阑尾切除术后有34例(22.52%)并发症。有12例(9.45%)中转开腹,其中大多数是阑尾位于盲肠后位的患者。两种手术方式中确诊急性阑尾炎的比例相似(腹腔镜手术——78.74%,开腹手术——79.47%)。阑尾无宏观变化及患有其他腹部疾病的患者比例也相似。

结论

腹腔镜检查能对大多数疑似急性阑尾炎患者进行准确诊断和最终治疗。一些患者还避免了开腹手术。腹腔镜手术患者的住院时间显著缩短,并发症发生率明显降低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验