Gonzales Ralph, Sauaia Angela, Corbett Kitty K, Maselli Judith H, Erbacher Kathleen, Leeman-Castillo Bonnie A, Darr Carol A, Houck Peter M
Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94118, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Jan;52(1):39-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52008.x.
: To measure and improve antibiotic use for acute respiratory tract infections (ARIs) in the elderly.
: Prospective, nonrandomized controlled trial.
: Ambulatory office practices in Denver metropolitan area (n=4 intervention practices; n=51 control practices).
: Consecutive patients enrolled in a Medicare managed care program who were diagnosed with ARIs during baseline (winter 2000/2001) and intervention (winter 2001/2002) periods. A total of 4,270 patient visits were analyzed (including 341 patient visits in intervention practices).
: Appropriate antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance educational materials were mailed to intervention practice households. Waiting and examination room posters were provided to intervention office practices.
: Antibiotic prescription rates, based on administrative office visit and pharmacy data, for total and condition-specific ARIs.
: There was wide variation in antibiotic prescription rates for ARIs across unique practices, ranging from 21% to 88% (median=54%). Antibiotic prescription rates varied little by patient age, sex, and underlying chronic lung disease. Prescription rates varied by diagnosis: sinusitis (69%), bronchitis (59%), pharyngitis (50%), and nonspecific upper respiratory tract infection (26%). The educational intervention was not associated with greater reduction in antibiotic prescription rates for total or condition-specific ARIs beyond a modest secular trend (P=.79).
: Wide variation in antibiotic prescription rates suggests that quality improvement efforts are needed to optimize antibiotic use in the elderly. In the setting of an ongoing physician intervention, a patient education intervention had little effect. Factors other than patient expectations and demands may play a stronger role in antibiotic treatment decisions in elderly populations.
测量并改善老年人急性呼吸道感染(ARI)的抗生素使用情况。
前瞻性、非随机对照试验。
丹佛大都会区的门诊诊所(4个干预诊所;51个对照诊所)。
参加医疗保险管理式护理项目的连续患者,这些患者在基线期(2000/2001年冬季)和干预期(2001/2002年冬季)被诊断为ARI。共分析了4270次患者就诊情况(包括干预诊所的341次患者就诊)。
向干预诊所的家庭邮寄适当使用抗生素和抗生素耐药性的教育材料。向干预诊所提供候诊室和检查室海报。
根据行政门诊和药房数据得出的ARI总体及特定病症的抗生素处方率。
不同诊所的ARI抗生素处方率差异很大,从21%到88%不等(中位数 = 54%)。抗生素处方率在患者年龄、性别和潜在慢性肺病方面差异不大。处方率因诊断而异:鼻窦炎(69%)、支气管炎(59%)、咽炎(50%)和非特异性上呼吸道感染(26%)。除了适度的长期趋势外,教育干预与ARI总体或特定病症的抗生素处方率更大幅度降低无关(P = 0.79)。
抗生素处方率差异很大表明需要进行质量改进努力以优化老年人的抗生素使用。在持续的医生干预背景下,患者教育干预效果甚微。除患者期望和需求外的其他因素可能在老年人群体的抗生素治疗决策中起更强的作用。