Hackett Elizabeth A, Francis Sally-Anne
Pharmacy Department, St. Thomas' Hospital, Lambeth Palace Road, London SE1 7EH, UK.
Pharm World Sci. 2003 Dec;25(6):288-93. doi: 10.1023/b:phar.0000006520.48054.91.
To investigate the views and experiences of British pharmacists in physician-assisted suicide (PAS) and voluntary active euthanasia (VAE) and to examine whether differences in views were associated with personal characteristics.
A postal questionnaire was mailed to a random sample of 500 registered pharmacists, with addresses in England or Wales, stratified according to sex and community/hospital working environments.
Pharmacists' reports of their views and experiences of PAS and VAE.
Completed questionnaires were received from 295 respondents (response rate: 59%). The majority of respondents (83%) reported that at times, a person had the right to choose their own manner of death; 61% and 53% thought that there should be changes in the Law to legalise VAE and PAS, respectively. If it were legal to do so, 63% stated that they would be willing to dispense medication for VAE and 64% for PAS. However, only 45% agreed that the pharmacist should have a role in advising the prescriber on the choice and dose of drugs used. Sex, age, and years registered as a pharmacist were not found to be significantly associated with views on the practices of PAS and VAE. However, pharmacists who reported having a religion were significantly less likely to favour such practices. On comparing the views of community and hospital pharmacists, community pharmacists were significantly less likely than expected to want to be informed about the intended purpose of lethal drugs.
In this survey, while over half of British pharmacists did not disagree in principle to the legalisation of VAE and/or PAS, they were less supportive of direct involvement in such procedures. Religion was a discriminatory factor associated with negative views of VAE and PAS. The significant minority of pharmacists not wanting to know the purpose of drugs they suspected might be for PAS or VAE is not in accordance with professional accountability, reflecting the complex and sometimes conflicting legal and moral aspects of such practices when deciding upon a course of action.
调查英国药剂师对医生协助自杀(PAS)和自愿安乐死(VAE)的看法和经历,并研究观点差异是否与个人特征相关。
向500名在英格兰或威尔士有注册地址的药剂师随机抽样邮寄问卷调查,根据性别和社区/医院工作环境进行分层。
药剂师对PAS和VAE的看法及经历的报告。
共收到295名受访者的完整问卷(回复率:59%)。大多数受访者(83%)表示,有时一个人有权选择自己的死亡方式;分别有61%和53%的人认为法律应做出改变使VAE和PAS合法化。如果这样做合法,63%的人表示愿意为VAE配药,64%的人愿意为PAS配药。然而,只有45%的人同意药剂师应在就所用药物的选择和剂量向开处方者提供建议方面发挥作用。未发现性别、年龄和注册为药剂师的年限与对PAS和VAE做法的看法有显著关联。然而,报告有宗教信仰的药剂师支持此类做法的可能性显著较低。在比较社区药剂师和医院药剂师的观点时,社区药剂师比预期更不愿意了解致命药物的预期用途。
在本次调查中,虽然超过一半的英国药剂师原则上不反对VAE和/或PAS合法化,但他们对直接参与此类程序的支持度较低。宗教是与对VAE和PAS持负面看法相关的歧视因素。相当一部分药剂师不想知道他们怀疑可能用于PAS或VAE的药物的用途,这不符合职业责任,反映出在决定行动方案时此类做法在法律和道德方面的复杂性及有时的冲突性。