Arner M, Kopylov P, Holmberg J
Department of Hand Surgery, Malmö Allmänna Sjukhus, Sweden.
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1992;26(3):271-4. doi: 10.3109/02844319209015270.
Fifty consecutive patients referred to the departments of hand surgery in Malmö and Lund were asked to chart their pain on a diagram of the body before their first visit to the clinic. Three patients never answered the questionnaire and were excluded. The drawings were evaluated separately by a senior hand surgeon without access to the case records. In 19 of 47 cases (40%) the evaluation of the pain drawings agreed with the clinical diagnosis. In another 17% (8 of 47), in which the pain drawings had indicated a condition not related to hand surgery, clinical examination failed to establish a diagnosis. The evaluation of the drawings had a false negative rate of 4% (2 of 47). In the remaining 18 cases pain drawings did not give enough information for diagnosis because of the variety of symptoms. Pain drawing seems to be valuable in the evaluation of patients with chronic pain in the upper extremity.
连续50名转诊至马尔默和隆德手外科的患者被要求在首次就诊前在人体图上标注出自己的疼痛部位。有3名患者从未回复问卷,被排除在外。由一名不查阅病例记录的资深手外科医生分别对这些绘图进行评估。在47例病例中的19例(40%)中,疼痛绘图的评估结果与临床诊断一致。在另外17%(47例中的8例)中,疼痛绘图显示的情况与手外科无关,临床检查未能确诊。绘图评估的假阴性率为4%(47例中的2例)。在其余18例中,由于症状多样,疼痛绘图未提供足够的诊断信息。疼痛绘图在评估上肢慢性疼痛患者方面似乎很有价值。