MacDowall Anna, Robinson Yohan, Skeppholm Martin, Olerud Claes
a Department of Surgical Sciences , Uppsala University Hospital , Uppsala , Sweden.
b Department for Learning , Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden.
Ups J Med Sci. 2017 Jun;122(2):99-107. doi: 10.1080/03009734.2017.1319441. Epub 2017 May 15.
Pain drawings have been frequently used in the preoperative evaluation of spine patients. Until now most investigations have focused on low back pain patients, even though pain drawings are used in neck pain patients as well. The aims of this study were to investigate the pain drawing and its association to preoperative demographics, psychological impairment, and pain intensity.
We carried out a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial, comparing cervical disc replacement to fusion for radiculopathy related to degenerative disc disease. Preoperatively the patients completed a pain drawing, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and a visual analogue scale (VAS). The pain drawing was evaluated according to four established methods, now modified for cervical conditions. Comparisons were made between the pain drawing and age, sex, smoking, and employment status as well as HADS and VAS.
Included were 151 patients, mean age of 47 years, female/male: 78/73. Pain drawing results were not affected by age, sex, smoking, and employment status. Patients with non-neurogenic pain drawings according to the modified method by Ransford had higher points on HADS-anxiety, HADS-depression, and HADS-total. Patients with markings in the head region had higher score on HADS-depression. Markings in the neck and lower arm region were associated with high values of VAS-neck and VAS-arm.
Pain drawings were affected by both pain intensity and anxiety/depression in cervical spine patients. Therefore, the pain drawing can be a useful tool when interpreting the patients' pain in correlation to psychological impairment and pain location.
疼痛图在脊柱疾病患者的术前评估中经常被使用。到目前为止,大多数研究都集中在腰痛患者身上,尽管疼痛图也用于颈部疼痛患者。本研究的目的是调查疼痛图及其与术前人口统计学、心理障碍和疼痛强度的关系。
我们对一项随机对照试验进行了事后分析,比较颈椎间盘置换术与融合术治疗与退行性椎间盘疾病相关的神经根病。术前,患者完成了一张疼痛图、医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)。根据四种既定方法对疼痛图进行评估,现针对颈椎情况进行了修改。对疼痛图与年龄、性别、吸烟和就业状况以及HADS和VAS进行了比较。
纳入151例患者,平均年龄47岁,女性/男性:78/73。疼痛图结果不受年龄、性别、吸烟和就业状况的影响。根据Ransford改良方法,非神经源性疼痛图的患者在HADS焦虑、HADS抑郁和HADS总分上得分更高。头部区域有标记的患者在HADS抑郁上得分更高。颈部和下臂区域的标记与VAS颈部和VAS手臂的高值相关。
颈椎疾病患者的疼痛图受疼痛强度和焦虑/抑郁的影响。因此,在解释患者疼痛与心理障碍和疼痛部位的相关性时,疼痛图可能是一个有用的工具。