Volker Deborah L
University of Texas at Austin School of Nursing, 78701, USA.
Cancer Nurs. 2003 Oct;26(5):392-9. doi: 10.1097/00002820-200310000-00008.
This qualitative study aimed to describe symptom management strategies oncology nurses have used in responding to and preventing requests of terminally ill patients with cancer for assisted dying (AD). The study involved secondary analysis of written stories from 36 nurses who agreed to describe their experiences with a request for assisted dying. Of the 36 nurses, 12 refused to support patient requests for AD and described their attempts to control the circumstances of dying by controlling symptoms. The remaining 24 nurses denied ever receiving requests for AD and described symptom management practices believed to prevent such requests. Data were analyzed using Denzin's process of interpretive interactionism. Two themes emerged from the participant's stories: alternative strategies for AD and prevention of requests for AD. The participants shared many examples of clinical interventions and other features of nursing responses to relieve or prevent suffering including physical, emotional, and spiritual care practices; comfort and medication management; and service as teacher-advocate. Both the nurses who had received requests for AD and those who had not used a variety of similar symptom management approaches to alleviate suffering. In doing so, these nurses upheld current standards of both their professional and specialty organizations.
这项定性研究旨在描述肿瘤护理人员在应对和预防晚期癌症患者提出的安乐死请求时所采用的症状管理策略。该研究对36名同意描述其处理安乐死请求经历的护士所写的故事进行了二次分析。在这36名护士中,有12名拒绝支持患者的安乐死请求,并描述了他们通过控制症状来控制死亡情况的尝试。其余24名护士否认曾收到安乐死请求,并描述了他们认为可预防此类请求的症状管理做法。数据采用丹曾的解释性互动主义方法进行分析。从参与者的故事中浮现出两个主题:安乐死的替代策略和预防安乐死请求。参与者分享了许多临床干预的例子以及护理应对措施的其他特点,以缓解或预防痛苦,包括身体、情感和精神护理措施;舒适护理和药物管理;以及充当教师-倡导者。无论是收到安乐死请求的护士,还是未收到此类请求的护士,都采用了各种类似的症状管理方法来减轻痛苦。通过这样做,这些护士维护了其专业组织和专科组织的现行标准。