Kleinman S, Alter H, Busch M, Holland P, Tegtmeier G, Nelles M, Lee S, Page E, Wilber J, Polito A
American Red Cross Blood Services, Los Angeles, California.
Transfusion. 1992 Nov-Dec;32(9):805-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1992.32993110750.x.
A new, multiple-antigen enzyme immunoassay (EIA-2) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibodies was evaluated in parallel with the previously available c100-3 HCV EIA (EIA-1) in 14,068 volunteer blood donors as well as in 25 cases of transfusion-associated hepatitis C for which recipient and donor samples were available. When compared to EIA-1, the EIA-2 was more sensitive in detecting HCV-infected blood donors. The EIA-2 detected an additional 1 in 1000 EIA-1-negative, surrogate marker-negative donors who were infected with HCV as demonstrated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The specificity of the EIA-2 was comparable to that of the EIA-1, but the two tests appear to detect different populations of false-positive donors. Recombinant immunoblot assay-indeterminate donors were detected five times more frequently by the EIA-2; PCR demonstrated that 21 percent of these donors were infected with HCV. The greater sensitivity of EIA-2 was also found in 25 transfusion recipients with non-A, non-B hepatitis; however, in 16 percent of these cases of posttransfusion HCV infection, the EIA-2 failed to detect an HCV-seropositive donor. These data indicate that EIA-2 testing will significantly reduce, but probably not eliminate, the risk of transfusion-associated HCV infection; we estimate this residual per-unit risk to be 1 in 2000 to 1 in 6000 units transfused. On a national level, it is projected that the replacement of the anti-HCV EIA-1 with the EIA-2 will initially prevent up to 40 additional cases of transfusion-associated hepatitis C per day.
在14068名志愿献血者以及25例有受血者和供血者样本的输血相关性丙型肝炎病例中,对一种用于检测丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)抗体的新型多抗原酶免疫测定法(EIA-2)与先前可用的c100-3 HCV酶免疫测定法(EIA-1)进行了平行评估。与EIA-1相比,EIA-2在检测HCV感染的献血者方面更敏感。EIA-2在每1000名EIA-1阴性、替代标志物阴性且经聚合酶链反应(PCR)证实感染HCV的献血者中又检测出1例。EIA-2的特异性与EIA-1相当,但这两种检测方法似乎检测出不同群体的假阳性献血者。EIA-2检测重组免疫印迹测定结果不确定的献血者的频率是EIA-1的5倍;PCR显示这些献血者中有21%感染了HCV。在25例非甲非乙型肝炎的输血受血者中也发现EIA-2具有更高的敏感性;然而,在这些输血后HCV感染病例中有16%,EIA-2未能检测出HCV血清学阳性的供血者。这些数据表明,EIA-2检测将显著降低但可能无法消除输血相关性HCV感染的风险;我们估计这种每单位的残余风险为每2000至6000单位输血中有1例感染。在全国范围内,预计用EIA-2取代抗HCV EIA-1最初每天可额外预防多达40例输血相关性丙型肝炎病例。