Lynn David J
Department of Psychiatry, Psychiatry Residency Program, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, 77555-0193, USA.
J Am Acad Psychoanal Dyn Psychiatry. 2003 Winter;31(4):609-25. doi: 10.1521/jaap.31.4.609.23009.
This paper is a historical study of Sigmund Freud's psychoanalysis of Edith Banfield Jackson. It relies on primary sources, including unpublished correspondence, to describe her background, the analysis itself, and her subsequent life. This analysis, which began in 1930, had both clinical and training purposes. Freud's actual methods are contrasted with his published recommendations in terms of anonymity, neutrality, and confidentiality. During this analysis, Sigmund Freud took on a number of roles in Edith Jackson's life, including teacher, commentator, social intermediary, recipient of her translation services, and recipient of her philanthropic donations. These roles are described in detail. The implications of Freud's actual methods in this case are fully discussed. Since Freud did not describe the methods he used in this case, they cannot be replicated, and, for clinical purposes, they are lost to history.
本文是对西格蒙德·弗洛伊德对伊迪丝·班菲尔德·杰克逊进行精神分析的一项历史研究。它依据包括未发表信件在内的一手资料,来描述她的背景、分析过程本身以及她随后的生活。始于1930年的这项分析兼具临床和培训目的。弗洛伊德的实际方法在匿名性、中立性和保密性方面与他发表的建议形成对比。在此次分析过程中,西格蒙德·弗洛伊德在伊迪丝·杰克逊的生活中扮演了诸多角色,包括教师、评论者、社会中介人、她翻译服务的接受者以及她慈善捐赠的接受者。这些角色将被详细描述。本文充分讨论了弗洛伊德在该案例中的实际方法所产生的影响。由于弗洛伊德未描述他在该案例中所使用的方法,这些方法无法被复制,并且从临床目的来看,它们已淹没在历史之中。