• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新锻炼者和习惯锻炼者对社区步道的使用:一项初步评估。

Use of a community trail among new and habitual exercisers: a preliminary assessment.

作者信息

Gordon Paul M, Zizzi Samuel J, Pauline Jeff

机构信息

West Virginia University, School of Medicine, Department of Human Performance and Exercise Science, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2004 Oct;1(4):A11. Epub 2004 Sep 15.

PMID:15670443
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1277951/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We evaluated physical activity patterns and trail use among new and habitually active exercisers using onsite trail interviews.

METHODS

Using a cross-sectional study design, 414 adults who accessed two new trails that bisect a rural community of 26,809 residents were interviewed during the first summer of the trails' official operation (2001). The trails comprise 12 miles of level and paved surface and run parallel to adjacent water sheds, businesses, and neighborhoods. Recent trail activity patterns were obtained, including the following: frequency of use, mode of activity, duration, distance traveled on trail, access points, time of day used, use of exercise companions, and distance traveled to get to trail. Perceived enablers and barriers related to trail use were also obtained. Data were compared between newly adopted exercisers (new exercisers) and individuals active prior to development of the trails (habitually active exercisers).

RESULTS

Twenty-three percent of the trail users were new exercisers. New exercisers were more dependent on the trails as a primary outlet for physical activity than were habitually active exercisers (P < .001). New exercisers traveled shorter distances to access the trails and rated convenience as a primary reason for using them. Both safety and terrain issues emerged as enablers for trail use, and unsafe conditions emerged as a concern among new exercisers.

CONCLUSION

A community trail may be an important vehicle for promoting physically active lifestyles. However, new exercisers must overcome issues of proximal and safe access from residential areas in addition to other safety concerns to achieve regular physical activity.

摘要

引言

我们通过现场步道访谈,评估了新的和习惯性活跃的锻炼者的身体活动模式及步道使用情况。

方法

采用横断面研究设计,在两条新步道正式运营的首个夏季(2001年),对414名使用了这两条将一个拥有26,809名居民的乡村社区一分为二的新步道的成年人进行了访谈。这些步道由12英里的平坦铺砌路面组成,与相邻的流域、商业区和社区平行。获取了近期的步道活动模式,包括以下方面:使用频率、活动方式、持续时间、在步道上行走的距离、入口点、使用时间、是否有锻炼伙伴以及到达步道的距离。还获取了与步道使用相关的感知促进因素和障碍。对新开始锻炼的人(新锻炼者)和在步道开发之前就活跃的个体(习惯性活跃锻炼者)的数据进行了比较。

结果

23%的步道使用者是新锻炼者。与习惯性活跃锻炼者相比,新锻炼者更依赖步道作为身体活动的主要途径(P <.001)。新锻炼者到达步道的距离较短,并将便利性列为使用步道的主要原因。安全和地形问题都是步道使用的促进因素,不安全状况是新锻炼者关注的问题。

结论

社区步道可能是促进积极生活方式的重要工具。然而,新锻炼者除了其他安全问题外,还必须克服从居民区到步道的近端可达性和安全问题,以实现定期的身体活动。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0524/1277951/1cb6af68d9f7/PCD14A11s1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0524/1277951/1cb6af68d9f7/PCD14A11s1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0524/1277951/1cb6af68d9f7/PCD14A11s1.jpg

相似文献

1
Use of a community trail among new and habitual exercisers: a preliminary assessment.新锻炼者和习惯锻炼者对社区步道的使用:一项初步评估。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2004 Oct;1(4):A11. Epub 2004 Sep 15.
2
Association between trail use and self-rated wellness and health.步道使用与自我评估的健康和健康之间的关系。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jan 30;20(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8273-0.
3
Characteristics of physical activity levels among trail users in a U.S. national sample.美国全国样本中步道使用者的身体活动水平特征。
Am J Prev Med. 2006 Nov;31(5):399-405. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.07.009.
4
Environmental perceptions and objective walking trail audits inform a community-based participatory research walking intervention.环境感知和客观步道评估为基于社区的参与式研究步行干预提供信息。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Jan 30;9:6. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-6.
5
Built environment and psychosocial factors associated with trail proximity and use.与步道临近程度及使用情况相关的建成环境和社会心理因素。
Am J Health Behav. 2007 Jul-Aug;31(4):374-83. doi: 10.5555/ajhb.2007.31.4.374.
6
Promoting physical activity in rural communities: walking trail access, use, and effects.促进农村社区的体育活动:步道的可达性、使用情况及效果
Am J Prev Med. 2000 Apr;18(3):235-41. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00165-8.
7
Trails and physical activity: a review.步道与身体活动:综述。
J Phys Act Health. 2011 Nov;8(8):1160-74. doi: 10.1123/jpah.8.8.1160. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
8
Travel to, and use of, twenty-one Michigan trails.前往并使用密歇根州的 21 条步道。
Prev Med. 2013 Mar;56(3-4):234-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.01.009. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
9
Associations between sociodemographic characteristics and perceptions of the built environment with the frequency, type, and duration of physical activity among trail users.社会人口特征与对建成环境的认知与步道使用者的体力活动频率、类型和持续时间之间的关联。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E53. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
10
Identification of Effective Programs to Improve Access to and Use of Trails among Youth from Under-Resourced Communities: A Review.识别有效项目以改善资源匮乏社区青年对步道的使用和利用:综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 22;17(21):7707. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217707.

引用本文的文献

1
Runnability: A Scoping Review.可跑性:一项范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jan 7;22(1):71. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22010071.
2
Field Test of a Passive Infrared Camera for Measuring Trail-Based Physical Activity.基于轨迹的身体活动被动式红外相机现场测试。
Front Public Health. 2021 Mar 17;9:584740. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.584740. eCollection 2021.
3
Identification of Effective Programs to Improve Access to and Use of Trails among Youth from Under-Resourced Communities: A Review.识别有效项目以改善资源匮乏社区青年对步道的使用和利用:综述。

本文引用的文献

1
Cost analysis of the built environment: the case of bike and pedestrian trials in Lincoln, Neb.建成环境的成本分析:以美国内布拉斯加州林肯市的自行车与行人试验为例
Am J Public Health. 2004 Apr;94(4):549-53. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.4.549.
2
Cost effectiveness of a bicycle/pedestrian trail development in health promotion.自行车/行人步道建设在促进健康方面的成本效益。
Prev Med. 2004 Feb;38(2):237-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.10.002.
3
The relationship between convenience of destinations and walking levels in older women.老年女性目的地便利性与步行水平之间的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 22;17(21):7707. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217707.
4
Comparing the Trail Users with Trail Non-Users on Physical Activity, Sleep, Mood and Well-Being Index.比较步道使用者和步道非使用者在身体活动、睡眠、情绪和幸福指数方面的差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 27;17(17):6225. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176225.
5
The Association of Trail Features With Self-Report Trail Use by Neighborhood Residents.步道特征与社区居民步道使用自评的关联。
J Phys Act Health. 2020 May 27;17(7):715-722. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2019-0347.
6
Association between trail use and self-rated wellness and health.步道使用与自我评估的健康和健康之间的关系。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jan 30;20(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8273-0.
7
Closing the loop: short term impacts on physical activity of the completion of a loop trail in Sydney, Australia.闭环:澳大利亚悉尼完成环路步道对身体活动的短期影响。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Jul 15;16(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0815-4.
8
Accelerometer and GPS Analysis of Trail Use and Associations With Physical Activity.加速度计和 GPS 分析步道使用情况及其与身体活动的关联。
J Phys Act Health. 2018 Jul 1;15(7):523-530. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2016-0667. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
9
Pre-test data and lessons learned from a group research project examining changes in physical activity behavior following construction of a rails-to-trails facility.前测数据和从一个研究小组的研究项目中吸取的经验教训,该项目研究了在建造一条铁路到步道设施后,身体活动行为的变化。
J Community Health. 2014 Apr;39(2):386-93. doi: 10.1007/s10900-013-9775-9.
10
Who uses new walking and cycling infrastructure and how? Longitudinal results from the UK iConnect study.谁使用新的步行和自行车基础设施,以及如何使用?英国 iConnect 研究的纵向结果。
Prev Med. 2013 Nov;57(5):518-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.07.007. Epub 2013 Jul 13.
Am J Health Promot. 2003 Sep-Oct;18(1):74-82. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-18.1.74.
4
Prevalence of physical activity, including lifestyle activities among adults--United States, 2000-2001.2000 - 2001年美国成年人身体活动(包括生活方式活动)的患病率
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003 Aug 15;52(32):764-9.
5
Environmental measures of physical activity supports: perception versus reality.身体活动支持的环境措施:认知与现实
Am J Prev Med. 2003 May;24(4):323-31. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(03)00021-7.
6
An environmental intervention to promote walking and cycling--the impact of a newly constructed Rail Trail in Western Sydney.一项促进步行和骑行的环境干预措施——悉尼西部新建铁路步道的影响
Prev Med. 2003 Feb;36(2):235-42. doi: 10.1016/s0091-7435(02)00025-7.
7
Perceptions of the physical environment, stage of change for physical activity, and walking among Australian adults.澳大利亚成年人对物理环境的认知、身体活动的变化阶段以及步行情况
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2002 Jun;73(2):146-55. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2002.10609003.
8
The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity. A systematic review.增加身体活动干预措施的有效性:一项系统综述
Am J Prev Med. 2002 May;22(4 Suppl):73-107. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00434-8.
9
Perceived environmental aesthetics and convenience and company are associated with walking for exercise among Australian adults.在澳大利亚成年人中,感知到的环境美学、便利性和陪伴感与步行锻炼有关。
Prev Med. 2001 Nov;33(5):434-40. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2001.0912.
10
Associations between self-reported and objective physical environmental factors and use of a community rail-trail.自我报告的与客观的物理环境因素与社区铁路步道使用之间的关联。
Prev Med. 2001 Feb;32(2):191-200. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0788.