Aud Myra A, Rantz Marilyn J, Zwygart-Stauffacher Mary, Manion Pam
Sinclair School of Nursing, University of Missouri at Columbia, Columbia, Mo 65211, USA.
J Nurs Care Qual. 2004 Jan-Mar;19(1):48-57. doi: 10.1097/00001786-200401000-00010.
The last decade has seen a substantial growth in the development of residential care facilities (assisted living facilities). Evaluation of the quality of care in this service delivery sector has been hampered by the lack of a consensus definition of quality and the lack of reliable instruments to measure quality. Founded on extensive research on nursing home care quality, a field test of the Residential Care Facility Version of the Observable Indicators of Nursing Home Care Quality Instrument was conducted in 35 residential care facilities in Missouri. Content validity of the 34 items was rated by 4 expert raters as 3.4 on a 4-point scale of relevance. Test-retest was 0.94, interrater reliability was 0.73, and internal consistency was 0.90 for the total scale, indicating excellent results for initial field-testing. A focus group confirmed the 5 dimensions of quality of care measured by the instrument as important in residential care settings.
在过去十年中,住宅护理机构(辅助生活设施)的发展显著增长。由于缺乏对质量的共识定义以及缺乏可靠的质量衡量工具,对该服务提供部门的护理质量评估受到了阻碍。基于对养老院护理质量的广泛研究,《养老院护理质量可观察指标住宅护理机构版》工具在密苏里州的35家住宅护理机构进行了实地测试。34个项目的内容效度由4名专家评分者在4分相关性量表上评定为3.4分。重测信度为0.94,评分者间信度为0.73,总量表的内部一致性为0.90,表明初始实地测试结果优异。一个焦点小组确认了该工具所衡量的护理质量的5个维度在住宅护理环境中很重要。