• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[韩国版养老院护理质量评估工具可观察指标的有效性和可靠性]

[Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the observable indicators of nursing home care quality evaluation instrument].

作者信息

Lee Jia

机构信息

College of Nursing Science, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Taehan Kanho Hakhoe Chi. 2008 Jun;38(3):474-82. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2008.38.3.474.

DOI:10.4040/jkan.2008.38.3.474
PMID:18604157
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purposes of this study were; 1) to test the validity and reliability of the Korean version of Rantz's Observable Indicators of Nursing Home Care Quality Instrument (ONHQ) and 2) to evaluate the quality of Korean nursing homes.

METHODS

The study employed a three-phase methodological research design. 1) The original instrument of Rantz's ONHQ was translated into Korean and modified by Korean nursing home experts. 2) A pilot study using the modified instrument was done in 20 nursing homes to examine inter-rater reliability. 3) The validity and reliability were tested in 98 nursing homes.

RESULTS

Seven factors were extracted through factor analysis: 'communication', 'care delivery', 'grooming', 'odor', 'environment-basics', 'environment-access', and 'environment-homelike'. These factors explained 86.07% of the total variance. Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the 30 items was .97 indicating a high internal consistency of the instrument. Inter-rater reliability according to Kappa was .82. The average score of nursing home quality was 112.07 indicating an average range of quality level.

CONCLUSION

The Korean version of the ONHQ was identified as a tool with a high degree of validity and reliability. This tool can be effectively used to assess the quality of nursing homes by professions as well as family members.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的为:1)检验韩国版兰茨养老院护理质量可观察指标工具(ONHQ)的有效性和可靠性;2)评估韩国养老院的质量。

方法

本研究采用三阶段方法学研究设计。1)将兰茨ONHQ的原始工具翻译成韩语,并由韩国养老院专家进行修改。2)使用修改后的工具在20家养老院进行了一项试点研究,以检验评分者间信度。3)在98家养老院对有效性和可靠性进行了测试。

结果

通过因子分析提取了七个因子:“沟通”、“护理提供”、“仪容整洁”、“气味”、“基本环境”、“环境便利性”和“家庭般的环境”。这些因子解释了总方差的86.07%。30个条目的克朗巴哈α系数为0.97,表明该工具具有较高的内部一致性。根据卡帕值计算的评分者间信度为0.82。养老院质量的平均得分为112.07,表明质量水平处于平均范围。

结论

韩国版ONHQ被确定为具有高度有效性和可靠性的工具。该工具可有效地用于专业人员以及家庭成员评估养老院的质量。

相似文献

1
[Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the observable indicators of nursing home care quality evaluation instrument].[韩国版养老院护理质量评估工具可观察指标的有效性和可靠性]
Taehan Kanho Hakhoe Chi. 2008 Jun;38(3):474-82. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2008.38.3.474.
2
Field testing, refinement, and psychometric evaluation of a new measure of nursing home care quality.疗养院护理质量新指标的现场测试、完善及心理测量学评估。
J Nurs Meas. 2006 Fall;14(2):129-48. doi: 10.1891/jnm-v14i2a005.
3
Quality of Care In Nursing Homes In Brazil.巴西养老院的护理质量。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Jul 1;18(7):636.e13-636.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.04.007. Epub 2017 May 31.
4
International field test results of the Observable Indicators of Nursing Home Care Quality instrument.养老院护理质量可观测指标工具的国际现场测试结果。
Int Nurs Rev. 2002 Dec;49(4):234-42. doi: 10.1046/j.1466-7657.2002.00143.x.
5
Developing a residential care facility version of the observable indicators of Nursing Home Care Quality Instrument.开发养老院护理质量工具可观察指标的寄宿护理机构版本。
J Nurs Care Qual. 2004 Jan-Mar;19(1):48-57. doi: 10.1097/00001786-200401000-00010.
6
[Development of an evaluation instrument for service quality in nursing homes].[养老院服务质量评估工具的开发]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2011 Aug;41(4):510-9. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2011.41.4.510.
7
Validation of the Chinese version of the satisfaction with the nursing home instrument.中文版养老院护理满意度量表的效度验证。
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Dec;15(12):1574-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01507.x.
8
The Revised Index for Social Engagement in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Psychometric Study.《长期护理机构社会参与度修订指数:一项心理测量学研究》
J Nurs Res. 2017 Jun;25(3):216-223. doi: 10.1097/JNR.0000000000000156.
9
Development and Validation of the Nursing Home Care-related Quality of Life Scale.养老院护理相关生活质量量表的编制与验证。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Nov;20(11):1412-1418.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
10
A psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the nursing home survey on patient safety culture.疗养院患者安全文化中文版的心理测量学评估
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Dec;26(23-24):4664-4674. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13815. Epub 2017 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship between environmental factors and responsive behaviours in long-term care homes: a secondary data analysis.长期护理院中环境因素与反应性行为的关系:二次数据分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 11;11(10):e047364. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047364.