• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一个连接社区赋权与健康公平的框架:这是一个选择的问题。

A framework linking community empowerment and health equity: it is a matter of CHOICE.

作者信息

Rifkin Susan B

机构信息

London School of Economics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK.

出版信息

J Health Popul Nutr. 2003 Sep;21(3):168-80.

PMID:14717563
Abstract

This paper presents a framework to explore the relationship between health equity and community empowerment. It traces the progression of the concept of participation to the present term of empowerment and the links among empowerment, equity, and health outcomes. It argues that the relationship can best be described by using the acronym CHOICE (Capacity-building, Human rights, Organizational sustainability, Institutional accountability, Contribution, and Enabling environment). Based on the concept of development as freedom put forward by Nobel Laureate Amartya Sen, the paper describes how each factor illustrates the relationship between equity and empowerment in positive health outcomes, giving appropriate examples. In conclusion, it is suggested that these factors might form the basis of a tool to assess the relationship between equity and empowerment and its impact on health outcomes.

摘要

本文提出了一个框架,用于探讨健康公平与社区赋权之间的关系。它追溯了参与概念到当前赋权术语的发展历程,以及赋权、公平和健康结果之间的联系。文章认为,这种关系可以用首字母缩写词CHOICE(能力建设、人权、组织可持续性、机构问责制、贡献和有利环境)来最好地描述。基于诺贝尔奖获得者阿玛蒂亚·森提出的发展即自由的概念,本文描述了每个因素如何在积极的健康结果中说明公平与赋权之间的关系,并给出了适当的例子。总之,建议这些因素可能构成评估公平与赋权之间关系及其对健康结果影响的工具基础。

相似文献

1
A framework linking community empowerment and health equity: it is a matter of CHOICE.一个连接社区赋权与健康公平的框架:这是一个选择的问题。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2003 Sep;21(3):168-80.
2
Equity, empowerment and choice: from theory to practice in public health.公平、赋权与选择:公共卫生领域从理论到实践
J Health Psychol. 2007 May;12(3):517-30. doi: 10.1177/1359105307076238.
3
Equity, Participation, and Power: Achieving Health Justice Through Deep Democracy.公平、参与和权力:通过深度民主实现健康正义。
J Law Med Ethics. 2020 Sep;48(3):393-410. doi: 10.1177/1073110520958863.
4
Allies unknown: Social accountability and legal empowerment.盟友未知:社会问责制和法律赋权。
Health Hum Rights. 2010 Jun 15;12(1):83-93.
5
Global Equity Gauge Alliance: reflections on early experiences.全球股票计量联盟:对早期经历的思考
J Health Popul Nutr. 2003 Sep;21(3):273-87.
6
Community empowerment for health visiting and other public health nursing.社区赋权促进健康访视及其他公共卫生护理。
Community Pract. 2011 Aug;84(8):28-31.
7
Building capacity through collaborative leadership.通过协作式领导来建设能力。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 1996 Oct-Dec;11(4):339-44. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1751(199610)11:4<339::AID-HPM443>3.0.CO;2-A.
8
Health through people's empowerment: a rights-based approach to participation.通过赋权促进健康:以权利为基础的参与方法。
Health Hum Rights. 2009;11(1):23-35.
9
A planning framework for community empowerment goals within health promotion.健康促进中社区赋权目标的规划框架。
Health Policy Plan. 2000 Sep;15(3):255-62. doi: 10.1093/heapol/15.3.255.
10
The paradoxes and promise of community coalitions.社区联盟的悖论与前景
Am J Community Psychol. 2001 Apr;29(2):309-20; discussion 321-9. doi: 10.1023/A:1010343100379.

引用本文的文献

1
A Political-Economic Model of Community and Societal Health Resources: A 92-Country Global Analysis.社区与社会卫生资源的政治经济模型:92个国家的全球分析
Sociol Health Illn. 2025 Feb;47(2):e13865. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13865. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
2
Alternative community-led intervention to improve uptake of cataract surgery services in rural Tanzania-The Dodoma Community Cataract Acceptance Trial (DoCCAT): a protocol for intervention co-designing and implementation in a cluster-randomized controlled trial.在坦桑尼亚农村地区改善白内障手术服务接受率的替代性社区主导干预措施——多多马社区白内障接受度试验(DoCCAT):一项在整群随机对照试验中进行干预共同设计与实施的方案
Biol Methods Protoc. 2024 Mar 8;9(1):bpae016. doi: 10.1093/biomethods/bpae016. eCollection 2024.
3
Realising radical potential: building community power in primary health care through Participatory Action Research.实现激进潜力:通过参与式行动研究在基层医疗保健中建立社区力量。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 May 17;22(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01894-7.
4
Advancing Health Equity in Community-Based Climate Action: From Concept to Practice.推进社区气候行动中的健康公平:从概念到实践。
Am J Public Health. 2023 Feb;113(2):185-193. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.307143.
5
Understanding Challenges to Health Equity in Climate Action and Land Use Planning.理解气候行动和土地利用规划中健康公平面临的挑战。
Am J Public Health. 2023 Feb;113(2):177-178. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.307189.
6
Themes for evaluating the quality of initiatives to engage patients and family caregivers in decision-making in healthcare systems: a scoping review.评价医疗体系中让患者和家属参与决策的举措质量的主题:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 11;11(10):e050208. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050208.
7
A Tripartite Knowledge Translation Program: Innovative Patient-Centered Approach to Clinical Research Participation for Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis.一个三方知识转化项目:针对多发性硬化症患者的以患者为中心的临床研究参与创新方法。
Mult Scler Int. 2021 Jul 16;2021:5531693. doi: 10.1155/2021/5531693. eCollection 2021.
8
Power, control, communities and health inequalities I: theories, concepts and analytical frameworks.权力、控制、社区与健康不平等 I:理论、概念与分析框架。
Health Promot Int. 2021 Oct 13;36(5):1253-1263. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaa133.
9
Can school-based physical activity foster social mobility?学校体育活动能否促进社会流动?
Can J Public Health. 2021 Feb;112(1):115-119. doi: 10.17269/s41997-020-00375-6. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
10
Evaluating the Healthy Futures Nearby Program: Protocol for Unraveling Mechanisms in Health-Related Behavior Change and Improving Perceived Health Among Socially Vulnerable Families in the Netherlands.评估“附近健康未来”项目:荷兰社会弱势家庭健康相关行为改变机制及改善健康认知的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Apr 2;8(4):e11305. doi: 10.2196/11305.