Suppr超能文献

体质性身材高大者的成人身高:五种不同身高预测方法的准确性

Adult height in constitutionally tall stature: accuracy of five different height prediction methods.

作者信息

Joss E E, Temperli R, Mullis P E

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, University of Berne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Arch Dis Child. 1992 Nov;67(11):1357-62. doi: 10.1136/adc.67.11.1357.

Abstract

The accuracy of height predictions at various ages based on five different methods (Tanner-Whitehouse mark I; Tanner-Whitehouse mark II; index of potential height; Bayley-Pinneau; Roche-Wainer-Thissen) was compared at yearly intervals with final height achieved in 32 boys (78 predictions) and 100 girls (227 predictions) with constitutionally tall stature. The boys were initially seen at a mean (SD) chronological age of 12.5 (3) years whereas the mean chronological age in girls was 11.8 (2.1) years. In tall boys Tanner-Whitehouse mark II gives a good estimation of final height up to the bone age of 13 years with a mean overestimation of 1 cm. The overestimation of final height is higher in the bone age groups 13-14 years (2.7 cm) and 14-15 years (3.4 cm) mainly due to the tall boys with a height greater than 3 SD scores. Up to the bone age of 12 years the final height is massively overestimated by the Bayley-Pinneau method but this method give relatively accurate estimations thereafter. The estimated confidence limits are large (+/- 8 cm) for the two methods up to a bone age of 15 years. In tall girls the Tanner-Whitehouse mark II method was accurate from bone age nine to 12 years but overestimated final height in the bone age groups 12-13 years and 13-15 years by a mean of 1.8 and 1.4 cm respectively. The Bayley-Pinneau method overestimated final height in the bone age groups 12-14 years whereas the height predictions are accurate thereafter. Up to a bone age of 13 years the estimated confidence limits for the two methods are large, +/- cm, but tend to improve thereafter. It is concluded that there is no best or most accurate method for predicting adult height in tall children. There are methods of first choice differing with respect to sex and bone age. In addition, correcting factors may improve their accuracy and correct their tendency to overestimate or underestimate adult height.

摘要

对32名身材高大的男孩(78次预测)和100名身材高大的女孩(227次预测),以年为间隔,比较了基于五种不同方法(坦纳-怀特豪斯I型;坦纳-怀特豪斯II型;潜在身高指数;贝利-皮诺;罗氏-韦纳-蒂森)在不同年龄预测身高的准确性与最终达到的身高。男孩最初就诊时的平均(标准差)实足年龄为12.5(3)岁,而女孩的平均实足年龄为11.8(2.1)岁。在身材高大的男孩中,坦纳-怀特豪斯II型在骨龄13岁之前对最终身高的估计较好,平均高估1厘米。在骨龄13 - 14岁组(2.7厘米)和14 - 15岁组(3.4厘米),最终身高的高估更高,主要是因为身高大于3个标准差分数的高个男孩。在骨龄12岁之前,贝利-皮诺方法对最终身高有大量高估,但此后该方法给出的估计相对准确。在骨龄15岁之前,这两种方法的估计置信区间都很大(±8厘米)。在身材高大的女孩中,坦纳-怀特豪斯II型方法在骨龄9至12岁时准确,但在骨龄12 - 13岁组和13 - 15岁组分别平均高估最终身高1.8厘米和1.4厘米。贝利-皮诺方法在骨龄12 - 14岁组高估最终身高,而此后身高预测准确。在骨龄13岁之前,这两种方法的估计置信区间很大,±厘米,但此后趋于改善。结论是,对于预测身材高大儿童的成人身高,没有最佳或最准确的方法。有因性别和骨龄而异的首选方法。此外,校正因子可能会提高其准确性,并纠正其高估或低估成人身高的倾向。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Diffusion Tensor Imaging of the Knee to Predict Childhood Growth.膝关节弥散张量成像预测儿童生长
Radiology. 2022 Jun;303(3):655-663. doi: 10.1148/radiol.210484. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
3
Tall Stature: A Challenge for Clinicians.高身材:临床医生面临的一项挑战。
Curr Pediatr Rev. 2019;15(1):10-21. doi: 10.2174/1573396314666181105092917.
4
Tall stature: a difficult diagnosis?身材高大:一个难以诊断的问题?
Ital J Pediatr. 2017 Aug 3;43(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13052-017-0385-5.
6
Bone age: assessment methods and clinical applications.骨龄:评估方法与临床应用
Clin Pediatr Endocrinol. 2015 Oct;24(4):143-52. doi: 10.1297/cpe.24.143. Epub 2015 Oct 24.
8
Human linear growth trajectory defined.人类线性生长轨迹的定义。
Am J Hum Biol. 2013 Sep-Oct;25(5):666-72. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.22428. Epub 2013 Aug 10.

本文引用的文献

3
Theoretical growth evaluation (TGE). A computerized screening system for growth disorders.
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1984 Nov;23(11):609-16. doi: 10.1177/000992288402301102.
5
Estrogen treatment of tall girls.
Am J Dis Child. 1973 Jan;125(1):71-4. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1973.04160010045010.
6
Skeletal age prediction.骨龄预测
J Pediatr. 1971 Jun;78(6):997-1003. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(71)80430-4.
8
Oestrogen treatment of constitutionally tall girls with 0.1 mg/day ethinyl oestradiol.
Eur J Pediatr. 1988 Jan;147(1):59-63. doi: 10.1007/BF00442613.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验