• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对头帽颏兜和Pend-x矫治器引起的上颌牙齿移动的对比分析。

A comparative analysis of maxillary tooth movement produced by cervical headgear and pend-x appliance.

作者信息

Taner Tülin Uğur, Yukay Filiz, Pehlivanoglu Muge, Cakirer Banu

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Hacettepe University Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2003 Dec;73(6):686-91. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0686:ACAOMT>2.0.CO;2.

DOI:10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0686:ACAOMT>2.0.CO;2
PMID:14719733
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of cervical headgear and pend-x on the maxillary first molar, second molar, first premolar, and upper incisors. Cephalometric radiographs were obtained at the start of treatment (T1) and after molar distalization was completed (T2) for 13 patients in a pend-x group and 13 patients in a cervical headgear group. The changes of the maxillary teeth were measured on maxillary superimpositions. Nonparametric Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare the mean differences between the two groups. The mean amount of distalization for the headgear group was 3.15 +/- 1.94 mm and that for the pend-x group was 3.81 +/- 2.25 mm. The second molar teeth were also distalized to a mean amount of 2.27 +/- 1.33 mm in the headgear group and 2.04 +/- 2.15 mm in the pend-x group. The mean treatment time for distalization was 11.38 +/- 3.18 months for the headgear group and 7.31 +/- 4.09 months for the pend-x group. During distalization, the maxillary molars tipped distally in both groups, but intergroup differences were not significant. The anterior inclinations of the first premolar and upper incisor increased significantly in the pend-x group (P < .01). Maxillary molars showed no vertical movement in the pend-x group but extruded in the headgear group (P < .01). The anchorage loss of the pend-x appliance as well as the necessary patient compliance and greater treatment time with the cervical headgear should be taken into consideration.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较颈带式矫治器和Pend-x矫治器对上颌第一磨牙、第二磨牙、第一前磨牙和上颌切牙的影响。对Pend-x矫治器组的13例患者和颈带式矫治器组的13例患者,在治疗开始时(T1)和磨牙远移完成后(T2)拍摄头影测量X线片。在上颌重叠片上测量上颌牙齿的变化。采用非参数Mann-Whitney U检验比较两组之间的平均差异。矫治器组的平均远移量为3.15±1.94mm,Pend-x矫治器组为3.81±2.25mm。矫治器组第二磨牙的平均远移量为2.27±1.33mm,Pend-x矫治器组为2.04±2.15mm。矫治器组远移的平均治疗时间为11.38±3.18个月,Pend-x矫治器组为7.31±4.09个月。在远移过程中,两组上颌磨牙均向远中倾斜,但组间差异不显著。Pend-x矫治器组第一前磨牙和上颌切牙的前倾显著增加(P<.01)。Pend-x矫治器组上颌磨牙无垂直移动,但矫治器组有伸长(P<.01)。应考虑Pend-x矫治器的支抗丧失以及使用颈带式矫治器时患者所需的配合度和更长的治疗时间。

相似文献

1
A comparative analysis of maxillary tooth movement produced by cervical headgear and pend-x appliance.对头帽颏兜和Pend-x矫治器引起的上颌牙齿移动的对比分析。
Angle Orthod. 2003 Dec;73(6):686-91. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0686:ACAOMT>2.0.CO;2.
2
Evaluation of the Jones jig appliance for distal molar movement.评估琼斯矫治器对远中磨牙移动的作用。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Nov;118(5):526-34. doi: 10.1067/mod.2000.110332.
3
A new approach in maxillary molar distalization: intraoral bodily molar distalizer.上颌磨牙远移的一种新方法:口内整体磨牙远移器
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Jan;117(1):39-48. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(00)70246-0.
4
Long- and short-term effects of headgear traction with and without the maxillary second molars.头帽牵引的长期和短期效果,有无上颌第二磨牙参与。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Oct;146(4):467-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.06.015.
5
Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods.使用远中喷射器对上颌磨牙远移的评估:与其他当代方法的比较。
Angle Orthod. 2002 Oct;72(5):481-94. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2002)072<0481:EOMMDW>2.0.CO;2.
6
The effects of the pendulum distalising appliance and cervical headgear on the dentofacial structures.摆式远中移动矫治器和高位头帽对牙颌面结构的影响。
Aust Orthod J. 2011 May;27(1):10-6.
7
Molar distalization with a pendulum appliance K-loop combination.磨牙远移的钟摆式矫治器 K 曲联合应用
Eur J Orthod. 2010 Aug;32(4):459-65. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp136. Epub 2010 Mar 15.
8
Extraoral vs intraoral appliance for distal movement of maxillary first molars: a randomized controlled trial.用于上颌第一磨牙远中移动的口外矫治器与口内矫治器:一项随机对照试验
Angle Orthod. 2005 Sep;75(5):699-706. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[699:EVIAFD]2.0.CO;2.
9
Maxillary molar distalization with a bone-anchored pendulum appliance.使用骨锚式摆式矫治器远移上颌磨牙
Angle Orthod. 2006 Jul;76(4):650-9. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0650:MMDWAB]2.0.CO;2.
10
Midpalatal miniscrews and high-pull headgear for anteroposterior and vertical anchorage control: cephalometric comparisons of treatment changes.中 palate 微型植入钉和高拉头帽用于前后向和垂直支抗控制:治疗变化的头影测量比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Aug;144(2):238-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.03.020.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of the efficacy of conventional, skeletal and invisible orthodontic appliance for upper molar distalization in Class II Malocclusion patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.传统、骨骼和隐形正畸矫治器对Ⅱ类错颌患者上颌磨牙远移疗效的分析:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Sep 2;25(1):1396. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06378-4.
2
Effectiveness and Clinical Indications of 2 × 4 Fixed Orthodontic Therapy in Regard to Mixed Dentition: A Systematic Review.2×4固定正畸治疗在混合牙列期的有效性及临床适应症:一项系统评价
Children (Basel). 2025 Jul 7;12(7):897. doi: 10.3390/children12070897.
3
Effects of early and later timed cervical headgear treatment on the eruption timing and pattern of permanent upper canines and molars from 7 to 18 years of age: follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.
早期和晚期定时使用颈带矫治器治疗对7至18岁恒牙上尖牙和磨牙萌出时间及模式的影响:一项随机对照试验的随访
Eur J Orthod. 2025 Jun 12;47(4). doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjaf056.
4
Orthodontic treatment for crowded teeth in children.儿童牙齿拥挤的正畸治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 31;12(12):CD003453. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003453.pub2.
5
The impact of force magnitude on the first and second maxillary molars in cervical headgear therapy.头帽颏兜治疗中,力的大小对上颌第一和第二磨牙的影响。
Eur J Orthod. 2021 Dec 1;43(6):648-657. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjab010.
6
Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年上前牙突出(安氏II类错牙合)的正畸治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 13;3(3):CD003452. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003452.pub4.
7
Comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy with erupted second molar: Segmented versus Quad Pendulum appliance.已萌出第二磨牙情况下磨牙远移治疗的比较评估:片段弓矫治器与四眼簧矫治器对比
Prog Orthod. 2014;15(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s40510-014-0049-6. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
8
Zygomatic mini-implant for Class II correction in growing patients.用于生长发育期患者II类错颌矫治的颧骨微型种植体
J Orofac Orthop. 2014 May;75(3):213-25. doi: 10.1007/s00056-014-0214-z. Epub 2014 May 15.
9
Orthodontic treatment for distalising upper first molars in children and adolescents.儿童及青少年上颌第一磨牙远中移动的正畸治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 23;2013(10):CD008375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008375.pub2.
10
Treatment effects of quad-helix on the eruption pattern of maxillary second molars.Quad-helix 治疗对上颌第二磨牙萌出模式的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2012 Jul;82(4):676-81. doi: 10.2319/072111-459.1. Epub 2011 Dec 8.