Suppr超能文献

麻醉诱导期间脑电图的熵值:以丙泊酚或氧化亚氮作为单一药物的对比研究。

Entropy of EEG during anaesthetic induction: a comparative study with propofol or nitrous oxide as sole agent.

作者信息

Anderson R E, Jakobsson J G

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Anaesthetics and Intensive Care, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2004 Feb;92(2):167-70. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeh036.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The search continues for an anaesthetic monitor that can define the level of anaesthesia in an individual patient irrespective of anaesthetic agent(s) used. Studies of available monitors based on bispectral analysis or evoked auditory potentials show the complexity of the problem. We assessed a new monitor, based on the entropy of the EEG, during induction of anaesthesia with either propofol or nitrous oxide.

METHODS

In an open, randomized study (two groups; n=10) of day surgical patients, we induced loss of response with incremental boluses of propofol. The other group was given propofol 30 mg and then increasing concentrations of nitrous oxide until loss of response. We measured entropy with the M-Entropy Module S/5 (Datex-Ohmeda) using forehead electrodes and recorded response entropy (RE; including frontal electromyogram) and state entropy (SE; only the cortical EEG). Values are median (range).

RESULTS

Baseline values were RE 98 (96-100), SE 89 (87-91) and RE 98 (96-99), SE 89 (87-91) for the propofol and nitrous oxide patients, respectively. During propofol induction, both entropy indices decreased with increasing sedation, with RE 40 (23-76) and SE 34 (17-70) at loss of response. Neither RE nor SE decreased during nitrous oxide inhalation, and at loss of response using nitrous oxide, RE and SE were unchanged at 98 (96-100) and 88 (85-91) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The entropy monitor of anaesthetic depth shows a successive decrease with propofol but loss of consciousness with nitrous oxide is not associated with change in entropy indices.

摘要

背景

人们一直在寻找一种麻醉监测仪,它能够确定个体患者的麻醉深度,而不受所使用麻醉剂的影响。基于双谱分析或听觉诱发电位的现有监测仪的研究表明了该问题的复杂性。我们在用丙泊酚或氧化亚氮诱导麻醉期间,评估了一种基于脑电图熵值的新型监测仪。

方法

在一项针对日间手术患者的开放性随机研究(两组;n = 10)中,我们通过递增推注丙泊酚诱导患者失去反应。另一组先给予30mg丙泊酚,然后增加氧化亚氮浓度直至失去反应。我们使用前额电极通过M - 熵模块S/5(Datex - Ohmeda)测量熵值,并记录反应熵(RE;包括额部肌电图)和状态熵(SE;仅皮质脑电图)。数值为中位数(范围)。

结果

丙泊酚组和氧化亚氮组患者的基线值分别为:反应熵98(96 - 100)、状态熵89(87 - 91)以及反应熵98(96 - 99)、状态熵89(87 - 91)。在丙泊酚诱导期间,随着镇静程度加深,两个熵指数均下降,失去反应时反应熵为40(23 - 76),状态熵为34(17 - 70)。在吸入氧化亚氮期间,反应熵和状态熵均未下降,使用氧化亚氮失去反应时,反应熵和状态熵分别保持在98(96 - 100)和88(85 - 91)不变。

结论

麻醉深度熵监测仪在丙泊酚诱导时呈现连续下降,但氧化亚氮导致意识丧失与熵指数变化无关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验