• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

液体复苏对脓毒症患者胃黏膜PCO2的影响。

Effects of fluid challenge on gastric mucosal PCO2 in septic patients.

作者信息

Silva Eliézer, De Backer Daniel, Creteur Jacques, Vincent Jean-Louis

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Route de Lennik 808, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2004 Mar;30(3):423-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-2115-2. Epub 2004 Jan 13.

DOI:10.1007/s00134-003-2115-2
PMID:14722633
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of fluid challenge on systemic hemodynamic variables and gastric intramucosal partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO(2)) in septic patients.

DESIGN

Short-term interventional study.

SETTING

Medical-surgical intensive care unit in a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Twenty-four adult patients with severe sepsis or septic shock requiring volume replacement. All patients were studied within 24 h of onset of severe sepsis or septic shock.

INTERVENTIONS

Five hundred milliliters of a 6% hydroxyethyl starch (HES) solution were administered in 30 min.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Complete hemodynamic data, blood samples, and gastric mucosal PCO(2) (automatic gas capnometry) determinations were obtained at baseline and 15 min after the end of fluid infusion. After fluid challenge, cardiac index (CI) increased from 3.8 (range 2.9-4.2) to 4.2 (range 3.1-4.9) l/min m(-2) ( p<0.05). The PCO(2) gap decreased from 9.8 (range 6.9-26.0) to 8.5 (range 6.6-17.4) mm Hg ( p<0.05), but important individual variations were observed. We failed to observe significant relationships between changes in CI and in PCO(2) gap, or between indices of preload (pulmonary artery occluded pressure, right atrial pressure, and pulse pressure variations) and changes in PCO(2) gap. In addition, changes in PCO(2) gap and in (v-a) CO(2) were not related; however, changes in PCO(2) gap were related to baseline PCO(2) gap ( p=0.003), PEEP ( p=0.02), and cumulative doses of vasopressors ( p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The effects of fluid challenge on gastric mucosal PCO(2) are variable and related to baseline PCO(2) gap rather than to systemic variables. In general, rapid volume infusion decreases PCO(2) gap, but this effect is more pronounced in patients with presumably impaired mucosal perfusion.

摘要

目的

确定液体冲击对脓毒症患者全身血流动力学变量及胃黏膜二氧化碳分压(PCO₂)的影响。

设计

短期干预性研究。

设置

大学医院的内科-外科重症监护病房。

患者

24例需要进行容量补充的严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克成年患者。所有患者均在严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克发作后24小时内接受研究。

干预措施

在30分钟内输注500毫升6%羟乙基淀粉(HES)溶液。

测量与结果

在基线时以及输液结束后15分钟获取完整的血流动力学数据、血样和胃黏膜PCO₂(自动气体二氧化碳分压测定法)测定值。液体冲击后,心脏指数(CI)从3.8(范围2.9 - 4.2)升/分钟·平方米增加至4.2(范围3.1 - 4.9)(p<0.05)。PCO₂差值从9.8(范围6.9 - 26.0)毫米汞柱降至8.5(范围6.6 - 17.4)毫米汞柱(p<0.05),但观察到明显的个体差异。我们未观察到CI变化与PCO₂差值变化之间、前负荷指标(肺动脉闭塞压、右心房压和脉压变异)与PCO₂差值变化之间存在显著关系。此外,PCO₂差值变化与(动-静脉)二氧化碳分压差变化无关;然而,PCO₂差值变化与基线PCO₂差值(p = 0.003)、呼气末正压(PEEP)(p = 0.02)及血管升压药累积剂量(p = 0.02)相关。

结论

液体冲击对胃黏膜PCO₂的影响是可变的,且与基线PCO₂差值相关而非与全身变量相关。一般而言,快速容量输注会降低PCO₂差值,但这种效应在推测黏膜灌注受损的患者中更为明显。

相似文献

1
Effects of fluid challenge on gastric mucosal PCO2 in septic patients.液体复苏对脓毒症患者胃黏膜PCO2的影响。
Intensive Care Med. 2004 Mar;30(3):423-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-2115-2. Epub 2004 Jan 13.
2
Comparison of systemic and regional effects of dobutamine and dopexamine in norepinephrine-treated septic shock.去甲肾上腺素治疗的感染性休克中多巴酚丁胺和多培沙明的全身和局部效应比较
Intensive Care Med. 1999 Sep;25(9):942-8. doi: 10.1007/s001340050986.
3
Dobutamine improves the adequacy of gastric mucosal perfusion in epinephrine-treated septic shock.多巴酚丁胺可改善肾上腺素治疗的感染性休克患者胃黏膜灌注的充分性。
Crit Care Med. 1997 Oct;25(10):1649-54. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199710000-00013.
4
Gastric PgCO2 and Pg-aCO2 gap are related to D-lactate and not to L-lactate levels in patients with septic shock.脓毒症休克患者的胃PgCO2和Pg-aCO2差值与D-乳酸有关,而与L-乳酸水平无关。
Intensive Care Med. 2003 Nov;29(11):2081-5. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1944-3. Epub 2003 Oct 8.
5
Volume expansion using pentastarch does not change gastric-arterial CO2 gradient or gastric intramucosal pH in patients who have sepsis syndrome.对于患有脓毒症综合征的患者,使用羟乙基淀粉进行容量扩充不会改变胃-动脉二氧化碳梯度或胃黏膜内pH值。
Crit Care Med. 2000 Jul;28(7):2254-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200007000-00012.
6
Assessment of hemodynamic and gastric mucosal acidosis with modified fluid versus 6% hydroxyethyl starch: a prospective, randomized study.
Intensive Care Med. 2000 Sep;26(9):1282-7. doi: 10.1007/s001340000606.
7
Gastric mucosal systemic partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO(2)) gradient in experimental endotoxin shock in swine--comparison of two methods.猪实验性内毒素休克时胃黏膜二氧化碳系统分压(PCO₂)梯度——两种方法的比较
Intensive Care Med. 2001 Dec;27(12):1923-30. doi: 10.1007/s00134-001-1141-1. Epub 2001 Nov 8.
8
A dobutamine test can disclose hepatosplanchnic hypoperfusion in septic patients.多巴酚丁胺试验可揭示脓毒症患者的肝脾灌注不足。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999 Sep;160(3):839-45. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.160.3.9807029.
9
Changes in p(i)CO(2) reflect splanchnic mucosal ischaemia more reliably than changes in pH(i) during haemorrhagic shock.在失血性休克期间,与pH(i)的变化相比,p(i)CO(2)的变化能更可靠地反映内脏黏膜缺血。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2001 Aug;386(5):333-8. doi: 10.1007/s004230100230.
10
Do fluid administration and reduction in norepinephrine dose improve global and splanchnic haemodynamics?
Br J Anaesth. 2000 Jun;84(6):758-62. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013589.

引用本文的文献

1
Fluid challenge in critically ill patients receiving haemodynamic monitoring: a systematic review and comparison of two decades.危重症患者血流动力学监测时的液体治疗挑战:二十年的系统回顾和比较。
Crit Care. 2022 Jun 21;26(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04056-3.
2
Regional capnometry to evaluate the adequacy of tissue perfusion.采用局部二氧化碳监测法评估组织灌注是否充足。
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Jul;11(Suppl 11):S1568-S1573. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.01.80.
3
Fluid administration for acute circulatory dysfunction using basic monitoring: narrative review and expert panel recommendations from an ESICM task force.

本文引用的文献

1
Gastric mucosal acidosis and cytokine release in patients with septic shock.感染性休克患者的胃黏膜酸中毒与细胞因子释放
Crit Care Med. 2003 Aug;31(8):2137-43. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000079600.49048.28.
2
Effects of dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine on the splanchnic circulation in septic shock: which is best?多巴胺、去甲肾上腺素和肾上腺素对脓毒性休克内脏循环的影响:哪种最佳?
Crit Care Med. 2003 Jun;31(6):1659-67. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000063045.77339.B6.
3
Gastric tonometry: the hemodynamic monitor of choice (Pro).胃张力测定法:首选的血流动力学监测方法(支持)
急性循环功能障碍患者的液体管理:来自 ESICM 工作组的基本监测叙事性综述和专家小组建议。
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Jan;45(1):21-32. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5415-2. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
4
Gastric Tonometry as a Prognostic Index of Mortality in Sepsis.胃张力测定作为脓毒症死亡率的预后指标
Med J Armed Forces India. 2007 Oct;63(4):337-40. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(07)80010-4. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
5
Fluid challenges in intensive care: the FENICE study: A global inception cohort study.重症监护中的液体冲击:FENICE研究:一项全球初始队列研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2015 Sep;41(9):1529-37. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3850-x. Epub 2015 Jul 11.
6
Gastric tonometry guided therapy in critical care patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.重症监护患者的胃张力测定引导治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2015 Jan 27;19(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0739-6.
7
The interface between monitoring and physiology at the bedside.床边监测与生理学之间的界面。
Crit Care Clin. 2015 Jan;31(1):1-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2014.08.001.
8
Can changes in arterial pressure be used to detect changes in cardiac index during fluid challenge in patients with septic shock?在感染性休克患者的液体冲击过程中,动脉压的变化能否用于检测心指数的变化?
Intensive Care Med. 2012 Mar;38(3):422-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2457-0. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
9
Effects of fluids on microvascular perfusion in patients with severe sepsis.严重脓毒症患者液体对微血管灌注的影响。
Intensive Care Med. 2010 Jun;36(6):949-55. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-1843-3. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
10
Year in review in intensive care medicine, 2004. III. Outcome, ICU organisation, scoring, quality of life, ethics, psychological problems and communication in the ICU, immunity and hemodynamics during sepsis, pediatric and neonatal critical care, experimental studies.2004年重症医学年度回顾。三、结局、重症监护病房组织、评分、生活质量、伦理、重症监护病房中的心理问题与沟通、脓毒症期间的免疫与血流动力学、儿科与新生儿重症监护、实验研究
Intensive Care Med. 2005 Mar;31(3):356-72. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2573-9. Epub 2005 Feb 18.
Chest. 2003 May;123(5 Suppl):469S-74S. doi: 10.1378/chest.123.5_suppl.469s.
4
2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference.2001年危重病医学会/欧洲重症监护医学学会/美国胸科医师学会/美国胸科学会/危重病医学学会国际脓毒症定义会议。
Crit Care Med. 2003 Apr;31(4):1250-6. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000050454.01978.3B.
5
Gastric capnometry with air-automated tonometry predicts outcome in critically ill patients.采用空气自动张力测量法的胃二氧化碳分压测定可预测危重症患者的预后。
Crit Care Med. 2003 Feb;31(2):474-80. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000050445.48656.28.
6
Association between mitochondrial dysfunction and severity and outcome of septic shock.线粒体功能障碍与感染性休克的严重程度及预后之间的关联。
Lancet. 2002 Jul 20;360(9328):219-23. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09459-X.
7
Assessment of hemodynamic and gastric mucosal acidosis with modified fluid versus 6% hydroxyethyl starch: a prospective, randomized study.
Intensive Care Med. 2000 Sep;26(9):1282-7. doi: 10.1007/s001340000606.
8
Protective effects of plasma replacement fluids on erythrocytes exposed to mechanical stress.血浆置换液对暴露于机械应力下的红细胞的保护作用。
Anaesthesia. 2000 Oct;55(10):976-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01531.x.
9
Volume expansion using pentastarch does not change gastric-arterial CO2 gradient or gastric intramucosal pH in patients who have sepsis syndrome.对于患有脓毒症综合征的患者,使用羟乙基淀粉进行容量扩充不会改变胃-动脉二氧化碳梯度或胃黏膜内pH值。
Crit Care Med. 2000 Jul;28(7):2254-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200007000-00012.
10
Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure.脓毒症致急性循环衰竭患者动脉脉压呼吸变化与液体反应性的关系
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 Jul;162(1):134-8. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.162.1.9903035.