Vinderola C G, Medici M, Perdigón G
Centro de Referencia para Lactobacilos, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Tucumán, Argentina.
J Appl Microbiol. 2004;96(2):230-43. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2004.02158.x.
To investigate whether there is a relationship between interaction sites in the gut, hydrophobicity, mucosal immunomodulating capacities and cell wall protein profiles in lactobacilli, bifidobacteria and enterococci.
Hydrophobicity, cell wall protein profiles and sites of interaction in the gut (by using fluorescein isothiocyanate-labelled bacteria) were determined for Lactobacillus casei, L. acidophilus, L. fermentum, Bifidobacterium bifidum, B. animalis and Enterococcus faecalis. We also determined the number of immunoglobulin (Ig)A+, tumour necrosis factor (TNF)alpha+, interleukin (IL)-6+ and IL-10+ cells after oral administration of the above bacteria to BALB/c mice. All strains assessed were found to interact with the sites of induction of the immune response in the gut. No correlation with hydrophobicity was observed. When some strains at certain doses were administered to mice, bacterial translocation to liver was observed. The oral administration of indigenous (104 cells day(-1)) and exogenous (107 cells day(-1)) bifidobacteria and lactobacilli for 5 consecutive days activated the systemic and intestinal mucosal immune response in a strain-specific way, independently whether the strain was indigenous or exogenous in relation to the host. The differences in the immunopotentiating capacity of the various strains might be related to the differences in their cell wall protein profiles.
Indigenous bacteria activated the mucosal immune response at a dose significantly smaller than the one required for probiotic exogenous bacteria. However, probiotic exogenous bacteria can be used at high concentrations in fermented dairy products with a great impact on the immune system, favouring its immunomodulation.
The immunomodulation capacity of probiotic bacteria is strain specific and independent of the specificity of the host. The ability of certain strains to down-regulate the production and release of IL-6 by IL-10 may have potential implications in their use in cases in which cytokine deregulation or excessive production at the mucosal level can be the cause of tissue damage.
研究乳酸杆菌、双歧杆菌和肠球菌在肠道中的相互作用位点、疏水性、黏膜免疫调节能力与细胞壁蛋白谱之间是否存在关联。
测定了干酪乳杆菌、嗜酸乳杆菌、发酵乳杆菌、两歧双歧杆菌、动物双歧杆菌和粪肠球菌的疏水性、细胞壁蛋白谱以及在肠道中的相互作用位点(通过使用异硫氰酸荧光素标记的细菌)。我们还测定了将上述细菌口服给予BALB/c小鼠后免疫球蛋白(Ig)A+、肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)α+、白细胞介素(IL)-6+和IL-10+细胞的数量。所有评估的菌株均被发现与肠道中免疫反应诱导位点相互作用。未观察到与疏水性的相关性。当以一定剂量给小鼠施用某些菌株时,观察到细菌向肝脏的移位。连续5天口服本地(10⁴个细胞/天⁻¹)和外源(10⁷个细胞/天⁻¹)双歧杆菌和乳酸杆菌以菌株特异性方式激活了全身和肠道黏膜免疫反应,无论该菌株相对于宿主是本地的还是外源的。各种菌株免疫增强能力的差异可能与其细胞壁蛋白谱的差异有关。
本地细菌激活黏膜免疫反应所需的剂量明显小于益生菌外源细菌所需的剂量。然而,益生菌外源细菌可以在发酵乳制品中以高浓度使用,对免疫系统有很大影响,有利于其免疫调节。
益生菌的免疫调节能力是菌株特异性的,且与宿主的特异性无关。某些菌株通过IL-10下调IL-6产生和释放的能力可能对其在细胞因子失调或黏膜水平过度产生可导致组织损伤的情况下的应用具有潜在意义。