• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Stratification of adverse outcomes by preoperative risk factors in coronary artery bypass graft patients: an artificial neural network prediction model.冠状动脉搭桥手术患者术前危险因素对不良结局的分层:一种人工神经网络预测模型。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003;2003:160-4.
2
Prediction of Prolonged Ventilation after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Data from an Artificial Neural Network.冠状动脉旁路移植术后长时间通气的预测:来自人工神经网络的数据。
Heart Surg Forum. 2017 Feb 24;20(1):E007-E014. doi: 10.1532/hsf.1566.
3
Development and validation of a clinical prediction rule for major adverse outcomes in coronary bypass grafting.
Am J Cardiol. 2001 Dec 1;88(11):1251-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)02086-0.
4
Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with multivessel disease.多支血管病变患者进行冠状动脉搭桥手术时体外循环使用与不使用的比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004 Jan;127(1):167-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.08.032.
5
Major risk stratification models do not predict perioperative outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with previous percutaneous intervention.主要风险分层模型并不能预测经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的患者行冠状动脉旁路移植术后的围手术期结局。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Jun;39(6):e164-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.01.054. Epub 2011 Apr 2.
6
Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左心室功能障碍患者的比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Apr;151(4):1092-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.11.023. Epub 2015 Nov 22.
7
Coronary artery bypass grafting in non-dialysis-dependent mild-to-moderate renal dysfunction.非透析依赖的轻至中度肾功能不全患者的冠状动脉旁路移植术
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001 Jun;121(6):1083-9. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2001.113022.
8
Coronary surgery in patients with peripheral vascular disease: effect of avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass.外周血管疾病患者的冠状动脉手术:避免体外循环的效果
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Apr;77(4):1245-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.09.054.
9
Complexity of coronary artery disease affects outcome of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with impaired left ventricular function.冠心病的复杂性影响左心室功能障碍患者行冠状动脉旁路移植术的预后。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Sep;146(3):656-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.08.058. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
10
Outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: Impact of preoperative risk.非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的结果:术前风险的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 May;145(5):1193-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.02.002.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence in Risk Stratification and Outcome Prediction for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.人工智能在经导管主动脉瓣置换术风险分层和结果预测中的应用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Pers Med. 2025 Jul 11;15(7):302. doi: 10.3390/jpm15070302.
2
A high-quality chromosome-level genome assembly of Pacific whiteleg shrimp (Penaeus vannamei).凡纳滨对虾的高质量染色体水平基因组组装
Sci Data. 2025 Feb 26;12(1):340. doi: 10.1038/s41597-025-04673-x.
3
Influence of weeding methods on rhizosphere soil and root endophytic microbial communities in tea plants.除草方法对茶树根际土壤和根系内生微生物群落的影响
Front Microbiol. 2024 Feb 7;15:1334711. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1334711. eCollection 2024.
4
Artificial Intelligence in Resuscitation: A Scoping Review.复苏中的人工智能:一项范围综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 14;12(6):2254. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062254.
5
Bayesian networks identify determinants of outcomes following cardiac surgery in a UK population.贝叶斯网络确定了英国人群心脏手术后结局的决定因素。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 Feb 6;23(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03100-6.
6
DNA damage repair gene mutations predict the efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy and immunotherapy plus platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective Chinese cohort study.DNA损伤修复基因突变预测晚期非小细胞肺癌铂类化疗及免疫治疗联合铂类化疗的疗效:一项中国回顾性队列研究
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2022 Dec;11(12):2539-2566. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-22-746.
7
The prognostic value of elevated neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio for cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值升高对心脏手术相关急性肾损伤的预后价值:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2023 Feb;67(2):131-141. doi: 10.1111/aas.14170. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
8
Machine learning methods for perioperative anesthetic management in cardiac surgery patients: a scoping review.心脏手术患者围手术期麻醉管理的机器学习方法:一项范围综述
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Dec;13(12):6976-6993. doi: 10.21037/jtd-21-765.
9
Identification and Validation of New Stable QTLs for Grain Weight and Size by Multiple Mapping Models in Common Wheat.利用多种定位模型鉴定和验证普通小麦粒重和粒大小新的稳定QTL
Front Genet. 2020 Nov 11;11:584859. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.584859. eCollection 2020.
10
Predicting reintubation, prolonged mechanical ventilation and death in post-coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a comparison between artificial neural networks and logistic regression models.预测冠状动脉搭桥术后再插管、机械通气延长及死亡情况:人工神经网络与逻辑回归模型的比较
Arch Med Sci. 2015 Aug 12;11(4):756-63. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2015.48145. Epub 2015 Aug 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Neural network modeling to predict the hypnotic effect of propofol bolus induction.用于预测丙泊酚单次注射诱导催眠效果的神经网络建模
Proc AMIA Symp. 2002:450-3.
2
Development and validation of a clinical prediction rule for major adverse outcomes in coronary bypass grafting.
Am J Cardiol. 2001 Dec 1;88(11):1251-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)02086-0.
3
Development and evaluation of models to predict death and myocardial infarction following coronary angioplasty and stenting.预测冠状动脉血管成形术和支架置入术后死亡及心肌梗死的模型的开发与评估。
Proc AMIA Symp. 2000:690-3.
4
Neural network modeling for surgical decisions on traumatic brain injury patients.用于创伤性脑损伤患者手术决策的神经网络建模
Int J Med Inform. 2000 Jan;57(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/s1386-5056(99)00054-4.
5
Assessing the outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery: how many risk factors are enough? Steering Committee of the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario.评估冠状动脉搭桥手术的结果:多少风险因素才算足够?安大略省心脏护理网络指导委员会
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Nov 1;30(5):1317-23. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00295-7.
6
Identification of preoperative variables needed for risk adjustment of short-term mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The Working Group Panel on the Cooperative CABG Database Project.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Nov 15;28(6):1478-87. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(96)00359-2.
7
Neural networks in clinical medicine.
Med Decis Making. 1996 Oct-Dec;16(4):386-98. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9601600409.
8
Advantages and disadvantages of using artificial neural networks versus logistic regression for predicting medical outcomes.使用人工神经网络与逻辑回归预测医学结果的优缺点。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Nov;49(11):1225-31. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00002-9.
9
A model that predicts morbidity and mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.一种预测冠状动脉搭桥手术后发病率和死亡率的模型。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Nov 1;28(5):1147-53. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(96)00310-5.
10
Prospective validation of artificial neural network trained to identify acute myocardial infarction.用于识别急性心肌梗死的人工神经网络的前瞻性验证
Lancet. 1996 Jan 6;347(8993):12-5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)91555-x.

冠状动脉搭桥手术患者术前危险因素对不良结局的分层:一种人工神经网络预测模型。

Stratification of adverse outcomes by preoperative risk factors in coronary artery bypass graft patients: an artificial neural network prediction model.

作者信息

Chong Chee-Fah, Li Yu-Chuan, Wang Tzong-Luen, Chang Hang

机构信息

Graduate Institute of Medical Informatics, Taipei Medical University, Taiwan.

出版信息

AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003;2003:160-4.

PMID:14728154
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1480326/
Abstract

We constructed and internally validated an artificial neural network (ANN) model for prediction of in-hospital major adverse outcomes (defined as death, cardiac arrest, coma, renal failure, cerebrovascular accident, reinfarction, or prolonged mechanical ventilation) in patients who received "on-pump" coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. We retrospectively analyzed a 5-year CABG surgery database with a final study population of 563 patients. Predictive variables were limited to information available before the procedure, and outcome variables were represented only by events that occurred postoperatively. The ANN's ability to discriminate outcomes was assessed using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and the results were compared with a multivariate logistic regression (LR) model and the QMMI risk score (RS) model. A major adverse outcome occurred in 12.3% of all patients and 18 predictive variables were identified by the ANN model. Pairwise comparison showed that the ANN model significantly outperformed the RS model (AUC = 0.886 vs.0.752, p = 0.043). However, the other two pairs, ANN vs. LR models (AUC = 0.886 vs. 0.807, p = 0.076) and LR vs. RS models (AUC = 0.807 vs. 0.752, p = 0.453) performed similarly well. ANNs tend to outperform regression models and might be a useful screening tool to stratify CABG candidates preoperatively into high-risk and low-risk groups.

摘要

我们构建并内部验证了一个人工神经网络(ANN)模型,用于预测接受“体外循环”冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的患者的院内主要不良结局(定义为死亡、心脏骤停、昏迷、肾衰竭、脑血管意外、再梗死或长时间机械通气)。我们回顾性分析了一个为期5年的CABG手术数据库,最终研究人群为563例患者。预测变量仅限于手术前可用的信息,结局变量仅由术后发生的事件表示。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析评估ANN区分结局的能力,并将结果与多变量逻辑回归(LR)模型和QMMI风险评分(RS)模型进行比较。所有患者中有12.3%发生了主要不良结局,ANN模型识别出18个预测变量。成对比较显示,ANN模型显著优于RS模型(AUC = 0.886对0.752,p = 0.043)。然而,另外两组比较,ANN与LR模型(AUC = 0.886对0.807,p = 0.076)以及LR与RS模型(AUC = 0.807对0.752,p = 0.453)表现相似。人工神经网络往往优于回归模型,可能是一种有用的筛选工具,可在术前将CABG候选者分为高风险和低风险组。