Chong Chee-Fah, Li Yu-Chuan, Wang Tzong-Luen, Chang Hang
Graduate Institute of Medical Informatics, Taipei Medical University, Taiwan.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003;2003:160-4.
We constructed and internally validated an artificial neural network (ANN) model for prediction of in-hospital major adverse outcomes (defined as death, cardiac arrest, coma, renal failure, cerebrovascular accident, reinfarction, or prolonged mechanical ventilation) in patients who received "on-pump" coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. We retrospectively analyzed a 5-year CABG surgery database with a final study population of 563 patients. Predictive variables were limited to information available before the procedure, and outcome variables were represented only by events that occurred postoperatively. The ANN's ability to discriminate outcomes was assessed using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and the results were compared with a multivariate logistic regression (LR) model and the QMMI risk score (RS) model. A major adverse outcome occurred in 12.3% of all patients and 18 predictive variables were identified by the ANN model. Pairwise comparison showed that the ANN model significantly outperformed the RS model (AUC = 0.886 vs.0.752, p = 0.043). However, the other two pairs, ANN vs. LR models (AUC = 0.886 vs. 0.807, p = 0.076) and LR vs. RS models (AUC = 0.807 vs. 0.752, p = 0.453) performed similarly well. ANNs tend to outperform regression models and might be a useful screening tool to stratify CABG candidates preoperatively into high-risk and low-risk groups.
我们构建并内部验证了一个人工神经网络(ANN)模型,用于预测接受“体外循环”冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的患者的院内主要不良结局(定义为死亡、心脏骤停、昏迷、肾衰竭、脑血管意外、再梗死或长时间机械通气)。我们回顾性分析了一个为期5年的CABG手术数据库,最终研究人群为563例患者。预测变量仅限于手术前可用的信息,结局变量仅由术后发生的事件表示。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析评估ANN区分结局的能力,并将结果与多变量逻辑回归(LR)模型和QMMI风险评分(RS)模型进行比较。所有患者中有12.3%发生了主要不良结局,ANN模型识别出18个预测变量。成对比较显示,ANN模型显著优于RS模型(AUC = 0.886对0.752,p = 0.043)。然而,另外两组比较,ANN与LR模型(AUC = 0.886对0.807,p = 0.076)以及LR与RS模型(AUC = 0.807对0.752,p = 0.453)表现相似。人工神经网络往往优于回归模型,可能是一种有用的筛选工具,可在术前将CABG候选者分为高风险和低风险组。