Lobach David F, Hasselblad Victor, Wildemuth Barbara M
Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003;2003:391-5.
Past efforts to collect clinical information directly from patients using computers have had limited utility because these efforts required users to be literate and facile with the computerized information collecting system. In this paper we describe the creation and use of a computer-based tool designed to assess a user's reading literacy and computer skill for the purpose of adapting the human-computer interface to fit the identified skill levels of the user. The tool is constructed from a regression model based on 4 questions that we identified in a laboratory study to be highly predictive of reading literacy and 2 questions predictive of computer skill. When used in 2 diverse clinical practices the tool categorized low literacy users so that they received appropriate support to enter data through the computer, enabling them to perform as well as high literacy users. Confirmation of the performance of the tool with a validated reading assessment instrument showed a statistically significant difference (p=0.0025) between the two levels of reading literacy defined by the tool. Our assessment tool can be administered through a computer in less than two minutes without requiring any special training or expertise making it useful for rapidly determining users' aptitudes.
过去试图利用计算机直接从患者那里收集临床信息的努力收效有限,因为这些努力要求用户具备读写能力并能熟练使用计算机化信息收集系统。在本文中,我们描述了一种基于计算机的工具的创建和使用,该工具旨在评估用户的阅读素养和计算机技能,以便调整人机界面以适应用户已确定的技能水平。该工具由一个回归模型构建而成,该模型基于我们在实验室研究中确定的4个对阅读素养具有高度预测性的问题以及2个对计算机技能具有预测性的问题。当在两种不同的临床实践中使用时,该工具对低素养用户进行了分类,以便他们获得适当的支持来通过计算机输入数据,使他们能够与高素养用户表现得一样好。用经过验证的阅读评估工具对该工具的性能进行确认后发现,该工具定义的两个阅读素养水平之间存在统计学上的显著差异(p = 0.0025)。我们的评估工具可以在不到两分钟的时间内通过计算机进行管理,无需任何特殊培训或专业知识,这使其对于快速确定用户的能力很有用。