Lien Eric L, Davis Anne M, Euler Arthur R
Wyeth Nutrition, Collegeville, Pennsylvania 19426, USA.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2004 Feb;38(2):170-6. doi: 10.1097/00005176-200402000-00013.
To assess growth, tolerance, and biochemical measures of protein status in term infants fed an experimental formula with reduced total protein concentration and enriched in bovine alpha-lactalbumin prepared from an alpha-lactalbumin dominant bovine whey.
Healthy, term, exclusively formula-fed infants < or =14 days postnatal age, between 10th and 90th percentiles in weight and length for age were studied in this randomized, masked, multicenter study. Infants received ad libitum feedings of either experimental or control formula for 12 weeks. Adverse events and acceptability of formulas were assessed every 2 weeks. Weight, length, and head circumference were measured at baseline and every 4 weeks. Serum creatinine, albumin, and blood urea nitrogen were assessed at baseline and study completion. Anthropometric measures were compared to Centers for Disease Control reference ranges using Z scores.
One hundred ninety-three infants were enrolled. One hundred thirty-four completed the protocol. Seventy-two received experimental formula, and 62 received control formula. The mean baseline body weight was higher in infants fed experimental formula (P = 0.042), so baseline weight was used as a covariate in statistical analyses. There were no differences between groups in gains in weight, length, or head circumference during the study. Mean serum albumin and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels were similar at study initiation. At study completion, serum albumin levels were the same in both groups, whereas BUN was significantly higher in infants fed control formula (P = 0.0016). More infants fed control (n = 20) than experimental (n = 15) formula discontinued the study because of adverse events. There were no differences in the adverse event profiles of the groups completing the study. Most of the adverse events were mild and resolved without treatment or sequelae. Acceptability and tolerance of the experimental formula was greater than the control formula, except at 2 weeks. Unacceptable ratings ranged from 0% to 10% (mean, 4.1%) in the experimental formula group and from 1.6% to 14.1% (mean, 7.0%) in the control formula group.
Growth and serum albumin were comparable in infants fed experimental and control formulas for the first 12 weeks of life, suggesting adequate protein nutrition from the alpha-lactalbumin-rich formula, despite its lower total protein content. Growth and adverse events data support the safety of the experimental formula. Fewer discontinuations and unsatisfactory ratings among infants fed the experimental formula suggest that it is better tolerated than control formula.
评估喂养一种总蛋白浓度降低且富含从以α-乳白蛋白为主的牛乳清中制备的牛α-乳白蛋白的实验性配方奶粉的足月儿的生长情况、耐受性及蛋白质状态的生化指标。
在这项随机、设盲、多中心研究中,对出生后年龄≤14天、体重和身长处于同年龄第10至90百分位数的健康足月儿且完全以配方奶粉喂养的婴儿进行研究。婴儿随意接受实验性配方奶粉或对照配方奶粉喂养12周。每2周评估配方奶粉的不良事件和可接受性。在基线时以及每4周测量体重、身长和头围。在基线时和研究结束时评估血清肌酐、白蛋白和血尿素氮。使用Z评分将人体测量指标与疾病控制中心的参考范围进行比较。
193名婴儿入组。134名完成了方案。72名接受实验性配方奶粉,62名接受对照配方奶粉。喂养实验性配方奶粉的婴儿平均基线体重较高(P = 0.042),因此在统计分析中将基线体重用作协变量。研究期间两组在体重、身长或头围的增长方面没有差异。研究开始时平均血清白蛋白和血尿素氮(BUN)水平相似。研究结束时,两组血清白蛋白水平相同,而喂养对照配方奶粉的婴儿BUN显著更高(P = 0.0016)。因不良事件而停止研究的喂养对照配方奶粉的婴儿(n = 20)比喂养实验性配方奶粉的婴儿(n = 15)更多。完成研究的两组不良事件情况没有差异。大多数不良事件为轻度,无需治疗或未留下后遗症即可缓解。除了在2周时,实验性配方奶粉的可接受性和耐受性大于对照配方奶粉。实验性配方奶粉组不可接受评级范围为0%至10%(平均4.1%),对照配方奶粉组为1.6%至14.1%(平均7.0%)。
在生命的前12周,喂养实验性配方奶粉和对照配方奶粉的婴儿生长情况和血清白蛋白相当,这表明尽管富含α-乳白蛋白的配方奶粉总蛋白含量较低,但蛋白质营养充足。生长和不良事件数据支持实验性配方奶粉的安全性。喂养实验性配方奶粉的婴儿中停止使用和不满意评级较少,表明其耐受性优于对照配方奶粉。