Jackson G M, Swainson R, Mullin A, Cunnington R, Jackson S R
University of Nottingham, UK.
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2004 Feb;57(2):223-40. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000198.
Previous research has shown large response time costs (in excess of 50 ms) when bilingual speakers switch predictably back and forth between naming items (a productive switching task) in their first (L1) and second languages (L2). A recent study using event-related potentials (ERPs) has shown that switching between languages is associated with activity over frontal (N2) and parietal (late positive complex) areas of cortex (Jackson, Swainson, Cunnington, & Jackson, 2001). Switching between naming in different languages requires a switch in both language representations and language-specific motor responses. The current study investigated a receptive (input) language-switching task with a common manual response. Number words were presented in L1 and L2, and participants were required to judge whether the words were odd or even (a parity judgement). Response costs were considerably reduced, and the frontal and parietal switch related activity reported in the productive switching task was absent. Receptive switching was associated with early switch-related activity over central sensors that were not language specific. These results are discussed in relation to the idea that there is no language-specific lexical selection mechanism. Instead the costs of receptive language switching may arise from outside the bilingual lexicon.
先前的研究表明,双语者在可预测地在其第一语言(L1)和第二语言(L2)之间来回切换命名项目(一项产出性切换任务)时,会出现较大的反应时间成本(超过50毫秒)。最近一项使用事件相关电位(ERP)的研究表明,语言之间的切换与额叶(N2)和顶叶(晚期正复合波)皮层区域的活动有关(杰克逊、斯温森、坎宁顿和杰克逊,2001年)。在不同语言之间进行命名切换需要在语言表征和特定语言的运动反应两方面都进行切换。当前的研究调查了一种具有共同手动反应的接受性(输入)语言切换任务。数字词以L1和L2呈现,参与者被要求判断这些词是奇数还是偶数(奇偶判断)。反应成本大幅降低,并且在产出性切换任务中报告的额叶和顶叶切换相关活动并未出现。接受性切换与中央传感器上与切换相关的早期活动有关,这些传感器并非特定于语言。将结合不存在特定语言词汇选择机制这一观点来讨论这些结果。相反,接受性语言切换的成本可能源于双语词汇表之外。