• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

From the mouths of babes: a response to "Should children decide whether they are enrolled in nonbeneficial research?" by David Wendler and Seema Shah.

作者信息

Trachtman Howard

机构信息

Schneider Children's Hospital.

出版信息

Am J Bioeth. 2003 Autumn;3(4):W35. doi: 10.1162/152651603322874762.

DOI:10.1162/152651603322874762
PMID:14744326
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
From the mouths of babes: a response to "Should children decide whether they are enrolled in nonbeneficial research?" by David Wendler and Seema Shah.童言无忌：对大卫·温德勒和西玛·沙阿所著《儿童应否决定自己是否参与无益处的研究？》的回应
Am J Bioeth. 2003 Autumn;3(4):W35. doi: 10.1162/152651603322874762.
2
Omitted considerations and populations: a response to "Should children decide whether they are enrolled in nonbeneficial research?" by David Wendler and Seema Shah (AJOB 3:4).被遗漏的考量因素与人群：对大卫·温德勒和西玛·沙阿所著《儿童是否应决定自己是否参与无益处的研究？》（《美国生物伦理学杂志》3:4）一文的回应
Am J Bioeth. 2004 Winter;4(1):W39-40. doi: 10.1162/152651604773067604.
3
A response to commentators on "Should children decide whether they are enrolled in nonbeneficial research?".
Am J Bioeth. 2003 Autumn;3(4):W37-W38. doi: 10.1162/152651603322614805.
4
Children's and their parents' views on facing research risks for the benefit of others.儿童及其父母对于为他人利益而面对研究风险的看法。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008 Jan;162(1):9-14. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2007.3.
5
Should children decide whether they are enrolled in nonbeneficial research?儿童应该决定自己是否参与无益处的研究吗？
Am J Bioeth. 2003 Autumn;3(4):1-7. doi: 10.1162/152651603322614382.
6
Empirical data and the acceptability of research risk: a commentary on the charitable participation standard.实证数据与研究风险的可接受性：关于慈善参与标准的评论
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008 Jan;162(1):88-90. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2007.4.
7
Why shouldn't children decide whether they are enrolled in nonbeneficial medical research?
Am J Bioeth. 2003 Autumn;3(4):35-6. doi: 10.1162/152651603322614535.
8
Giving Children a Say without Giving Them a Choice: Obtaining Affirmation of a child's Non-dissent to Participation in Nonbeneficial Research.让儿童有发言权而不让他们做选择：获得儿童对不参与无益研究的同意。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2020 Jan;29(1):80-97. doi: 10.1017/S0963180119000811.
9
A new justification for pediatric research without the potential for clinical benefit.为没有临床获益可能的儿科研究提供新的正当理由。
Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(1):23-31. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.634482.
10
The ethics of phase I pediatric oncology trials.I期儿科肿瘤试验的伦理学
IRB. 1995 Jan-Feb;17(1):1-5.