Suppr超能文献

在血液透析超滤过程中,全身血细胞比容与总体血细胞比容之间的关系并不恒定。

The relationship between systemic and whole-body hematocrit is not constant during ultrafiltration on hemodialysis.

作者信息

Mitra Sandip, Chamney Paul, Greenwood Roger, Farrington Ken

机构信息

Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004 Feb;15(2):463-9. doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000108970.48370.33.

Abstract

The measurement of relative blood volume (RBV) changes during ultrafiltration assume a constant mass and distribution of circulating blood components such as hematocrit. The authors examine the validity of this assumption in 10 subjects undergoing repeated direct measurements of systemic hematocrit and plasma volume (PV(icg)) using indocyanine green dilution at four stages of dialysis with intermittent ultrafiltration. Ultrasonic RBV changes were monitored. Absolute blood volumes (ABV) were initially derived for each PV(icg) estimate, and corresponding measured systemic hematocrit was adjusted by a factor of 0.86 to correct for the difference between the systemic and whole-body hematocrit (constant Fcell ratio). PV(icg) and ABV changes correlated closely (R = 0.98; P <0.001). ABV changes overestimated reduction in PV(icg) during ultrafiltration (mean difference, -140 +/- 202 ml). The calculated red cell mass however was variable (P <0.01). Fcell ratio was then adjusted at each blood volume measurement (Fcell(1), 0.87 +/- 0.02; Fcell(2), 0.89 +/- 0.03; Fcell(3), 0.94 +/- 0.06; Fcell(4), 0.94 +/- 0.04; P <0.01) to maintain a constant red cell mass (2146 +/- 460 ml). When ABV was recalculated using PV(icg), systemic hematocrit and variable Fcell (ABV(Fvariable)), the mean difference between PV(icg) changes and ABV(Fvariable) changes, was negligible (-0.2 +/- 35 ml). During intermittent ultrafiltration, RBV changes systematically underestimated the percentage reduction in ABV (mean difference, 7.7 +/- 10.6%). When corrected for variations in Fcell, ABV(Fvariable) and RBV differences were negligible (mean difference 1.2 +/- 2.6%). Varying Fcell ratio probably reflects microvascular volume change with net fluid shift from the microcirculation to macrocirculation (intravascular refill). This may result in underestimation of changes in systemic hematocrit and RBV during dialysis such that they were less than those predicted by directly measured changes in plasma volume.

摘要

超滤过程中相对血容量(RBV)变化的测量假定循环血液成分(如血细胞比容)的质量和分布恒定。作者在10名受试者中,使用吲哚菁绿稀释法在间歇性超滤透析的四个阶段对全身血细胞比容和血浆容量(PV(icg))进行重复直接测量,检验了这一假设的有效性。监测超声RBV变化。最初为每个PV(icg)估计值得出绝对血容量(ABV),并将相应测量的全身血细胞比容乘以0.86进行校正,以纠正全身和全身血细胞比容之间的差异(恒定Fcell比率)。PV(icg)和ABV变化密切相关(R = 0.98;P <0.001)。超滤过程中ABV变化高估了PV(icg)的减少量(平均差异,-140±202 ml)。然而,计算得出的红细胞质量是可变的(P <0.01)。然后在每次血容量测量时调整Fcell比率(Fcell(1),0.87±0.02;Fcell(2),0.89±0.03;Fcell(3),0.94±0.06;Fcell(4),0.94±0.04;P <0.01),以维持恒定的红细胞质量(2146±460 ml)。当使用PV(icg)、全身血细胞比容和可变Fcell重新计算ABV(ABV(Fvariable))时,PV(icg)变化与ABV(Fvariable)变化之间的平均差异可忽略不计(-0.2±35 ml)。在间歇性超滤过程中,RBV变化系统性地低估了ABV的减少百分比(平均差异,7.7±10.6%)。校正Fcell变化后,ABV(Fvariable)和RBV差异可忽略不计(平均差异1.2±2.6%)。Fcell比率的变化可能反映了微血管容量的变化以及净液体从微循环向大循环的转移(血管内再充盈)。这可能导致透析期间全身血细胞比容和RBV变化的低估,使其小于通过直接测量血浆容量变化所预测的变化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验