• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Predictiveness of a visual distractor modulates saccadic responses to auditory targets.

作者信息

Kirchner Holle, Colonius Hans

机构信息

European Graduate School Neurosensory Systems, Carl-von-Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Postfach 2503, 26111 Oldenburg, Germany.

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2004 Mar;155(2):257-60. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1818-5. Epub 2004 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1007/s00221-003-1818-5
PMID:14747887
Abstract

We are faster to orient our eyes toward a visual target that also produces a sound. Conversely, the response to an auditory target is prolonged if a visual distractor is presented at a spatially incongruent position. Here, participants exhibited faster saccadic reaction times when an auditory target was more likely to be presented opposite to a visual distractor than when the stimuli only rarely occurred in spatial disparity. In contrast to experiments with visual targets and an auditory distractor, a spatially congruent visual distractor did not facilitate the response to an auditory target. We interpret the results in terms of an ocular inhibition process to suppress an automatic orienting response to the location of the visual distractor. This process is shown to be modulated by the predictability of target location.

摘要

相似文献

1
Predictiveness of a visual distractor modulates saccadic responses to auditory targets.
Exp Brain Res. 2004 Mar;155(2):257-60. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1818-5. Epub 2004 Jan 28.
2
Cognitive control can modulate intersensory facilitation: speeding up visual antisaccades with an auditory distractor.认知控制可以调节跨感觉通道促进作用:通过听觉干扰物加快视觉反扫视任务的执行。
Exp Brain Res. 2005 Oct;166(3-4):440-4. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-2383-x. Epub 2005 Jul 21.
3
The latency of saccades toward auditory targets in humans.人类中朝向听觉目标的扫视潜伏期。
Prog Brain Res. 2002;140:51-9. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(02)40041-6.
4
Audio-visual integration and saccadic inhibition.视听整合与眼球运动抑制
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(7):1295-305. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.979210. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
5
The influence of vertically and horizontally aligned visual distractors on aurally guided saccadic eye movements.垂直和水平排列的视觉干扰物对听觉引导的眼球跳动的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2014 Apr;232(4):1357-66. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-3854-8. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
6
Effects of spatial response coding on distractor processing: evidence from auditory spatial negative priming tasks with keypress, joystick, and head movement responses.空间反应编码对分心物加工的影响:来自按键、操纵杆和头部运动反应的听觉空间负启动任务的证据。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Jan;77(1):293-310. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0760-x.
7
The effect of spatial-temporal audiovisual disparities on saccades in a complex scene.时空视听差异对复杂场景中眼跳的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2009 Sep;198(2-3):425-37. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1815-4. Epub 2009 May 5.
8
Eye-centered, head-centered, and complex coding of visual and auditory targets in the intraparietal sulcus.顶内沟中视觉和听觉目标的以眼为中心、以头为中心及复杂编码
J Neurophysiol. 2005 Oct;94(4):2331-52. doi: 10.1152/jn.00021.2005. Epub 2005 Apr 20.
9
The eccentricity effect for auditory saccadic reaction times is independent of target frequency.听觉扫视反应时的偏心率效应与目标频率无关。
Hear Res. 2010 Apr;262(1-2):19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.01.016. Epub 2010 Feb 6.
10
Relationships between manual reaction time and saccade latency in response to visual and auditory stimuli.对视觉和听觉刺激做出反应时手动反应时间与扫视潜伏期之间的关系。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1991 Apr;62(4):315-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Are somatosensory saccades voluntary or reflexive?体感扫视是自主的还是反射性的?
Exp Brain Res. 2006 Jan;168(4):557-65. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-0116-9. Epub 2005 Nov 5.
2
Cognitive control can modulate intersensory facilitation: speeding up visual antisaccades with an auditory distractor.认知控制可以调节跨感觉通道促进作用:通过听觉干扰物加快视觉反扫视任务的执行。
Exp Brain Res. 2005 Oct;166(3-4):440-4. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-2383-x. Epub 2005 Jul 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Why are antisaccades slower than prosaccades? A novel finding using a new paradigm.为什么反扫视比顺扫视慢?一项使用新范式的新发现。
Neuroreport. 2003 Jan 20;14(1):151-5. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200301200-00028.
2
Auditory-visual interactions subserving goal-directed saccades in a complex scene.在复杂场景中服务于目标导向扫视的视听交互。
J Neurophysiol. 2002 Jul;88(1):438-54. doi: 10.1152/jn.2002.88.1.438.
3
Less attention is more in the preparation of antisaccades, but not prosaccades.在反扫视任务的准备过程中,较少的注意力投入更为有效,但在顺扫视任务中并非如此。
Nat Neurosci. 2001 Oct;4(10):1037-42. doi: 10.1038/nn723.
4
A two-stage model for visual-auditory interaction in saccadic latencies.
Percept Psychophys. 2001 Jan;63(1):126-47. doi: 10.3758/bf03200508.
5
Human eye-head gaze shifts in a distractor task. I. Truncated gaze shifts.
J Neurophysiol. 1999 Sep;82(3):1390-405. doi: 10.1152/jn.1999.82.3.1390.
6
Action-based mechanisms of attention.基于行动的注意力机制。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998 Aug 29;353(1373):1385-93. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0292.
7
Reflex suppression in the anti-saccade task is dependent on prestimulus neural processes.反扫视任务中的反射抑制取决于刺激前的神经过程。
J Neurophysiol. 1998 Sep;80(3):1584-9. doi: 10.1152/jn.1998.80.3.1584.
8
The influence of auditory and visual distractors on human orienting gaze shifts.听觉和视觉干扰因素对人类定向注视转移的影响。
J Neurosci. 1996 Dec 15;16(24):8193-207. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-24-08193.1996.
9
Intentional versus unintentional use of contingencies between perceptual events.感知事件之间偶然性的有意使用与无意使用。
Percept Psychophys. 1996 Apr;58(3):460-70. doi: 10.3758/bf03206821.
10
Spatial and temporal factors determine auditory-visual interactions in human saccadic eye movements.空间和时间因素决定了人类扫视眼动中的视听交互作用。
Percept Psychophys. 1995 Aug;57(6):802-16. doi: 10.3758/bf03206796.