Morant S V, McMahon A D, Cleland J G F, Davey P G, MacDonald T M
Medicines Monitoring Unit (MEMO), Department of Medicine & Therapeutics, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY, Scotland, UK.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Feb;57(2):188-98. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01979.x.
To determine the cost to the NHS of prescribed low-dose aspirin.
This was a population based observational cohort study. Patients from Tayside Scotland (17 244 new users of dispensed aspirin each with 10 matched comparators) were included. A pragmatic analysis totalled costs from the start to end of the study and compared these with a matched cohort of aspirin nonusers to estimate excess costs. Fastidious analyses were done of subjects with no prior history of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) or renal disease where the cost that occurred during aspirin exposure, the 30 days following aspirin exposure and subsequent nonexposure was calculated adjusting for risk factors in each period.
Subjects took aspirin for only 1.18 of the 2.53 years follow-up (47% compliance). Aspirin use cost an additional 49.86 UK pounds per year (pragmatic analysis) made up of 1.96 UK pounds for aspirin tablets (4%), 5.49 UK pounds for dispensing costs (11%), 24.60 UK pounds for UGI complications (49%) and 17.81 UK pounds for renal complications (36%). The costs for managing complications were substantially lower in the fastidious analysis (2.66 UK pounds for UGI complications and 2.92 UK pounds for renal complications). Assuming that the antiplatelet trial meta-analysis is an accurate assessment of the benefits of aspirin, the costs of preventing one vascular event lay between 62 500 UK pounds (primary prevention, pragmatic analysis) and 867 UK pounds (secondary prevention, fastidious analysis). These costs may be underestimates due to the low compliance observed.
Compliance with aspirin was poor. Serious adverse events were uncommon but despite this aspirin cost the NHS between 6 and 25 times the cost of aspirin tablets due to dispensing costs and the cost of managing adverse effects.
确定英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)中低剂量阿司匹林处方的成本。
这是一项基于人群的观察性队列研究。纳入了来自苏格兰泰赛德地区的患者(17244名新使用阿司匹林的患者,每名患者有10名匹配的对照者)。进行了务实分析,汇总了研究开始至结束的总成本,并将其与阿司匹林未使用者的匹配队列进行比较,以估计额外成本。对无上消化道(UGI)或肾脏疾病既往史的受试者进行了细致分析,计算了阿司匹林暴露期间、阿司匹林暴露后30天及随后未暴露期间发生的成本,并对每个时期的风险因素进行了调整。
在2.53年的随访中,受试者服用阿司匹林的时间仅为1.18年(依从性为47%)。使用阿司匹林每年额外花费49.86英镑(务实分析),其中阿司匹林片剂花费1.96英镑(4%),配药成本5.49英镑(11%),UGI并发症花费24.60英镑(49%),肾脏并发症花费17.81英镑(36%)。在细致分析中,管理并发症的成本大幅降低(UGI并发症为2.66英镑,肾脏并发症为2.92英镑)。假设抗血小板试验的荟萃分析准确评估了阿司匹林的益处,预防一次血管事件的成本在62500英镑(一级预防,务实分析)至867英镑(二级预防,细致分析)之间。由于观察到的依从性较低,这些成本可能被低估了。
阿司匹林的依从性较差。严重不良事件并不常见,但尽管如此,由于配药成本和管理不良反应的成本,阿司匹林给NHS带来的成本是阿司匹林片剂成本的6至25倍。