Huang Elbert S, Gleason Suzanne, Gaudette Ronald, Cagliero Enrico, Murphy-Sheehy Patricia, Nathan David M, Singer Daniel E, Meigs James B
General Medicine Division, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinoos 60637, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Jan;19(1):28-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30402.x.
Studies have proposed that the features of diabetes clinics may decrease hospital utilization and costs by reducing complications and providing more efficient outpatient care. We compared the health care utilization associated with a diabetes center (DC) and a general medicine clinic (GMC).
Retrospective cohort study.
An urban academic medical center.
PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Type 2 diabetes patients (N = 601) under care in a DC and GMC before March 1996.
We compared baseline patient characteristics and outpatient care for the period of March 1996 to August 1997. Using administrative data from March 1996 to October 2000, we compared the probability of a hospitalization, length of stay, costs of hospitalizations, the probability of an emergency room visit, and costs of emergency room visits. Diabetes center patients had a longer mean duration of diabetes (12 years vs 6 years, P <.01), more baseline microvascular disease (65% vs 44%, P <.01), and higher baseline glucose levels (hemoglobin A1c 8.6% vs 7.9%, P <.01) than GMC patients. Diabetes center patients received more intensive outpatient care directed toward glucose monitoring and control. In all crude and adjusted analyses of hospitalizations and emergency room visits, we found no statistically significant differences for inpatient utilization or cost outcomes comparing clinic populations.
Diabetes center attendance did not have a definitive positive or negative impact on inpatient resource utilization over a 4-year period. However, DC patients had more severe diabetes but no greater hospital utilization compared with GMC patients. Clear demonstration of the clinical and financial benefits of features of diabetes centers will require long-term controlled trials of interventions that promote comprehensive diabetes care, including cardiovascular prevention.
研究表明,糖尿病诊所的特点可能通过减少并发症和提供更高效的门诊护理来降低医院利用率和成本。我们比较了糖尿病中心(DC)和普通内科诊所(GMC)的医疗保健利用率。
回顾性队列研究。
城市学术医疗中心。
患者/参与者:1996年3月前在DC和GMC接受治疗的2型糖尿病患者(N = 601)。
我们比较了1996年3月至1997年8月期间患者的基线特征和门诊护理情况。利用1996年3月至2000年10月的行政数据,我们比较了住院概率、住院时间、住院费用、急诊就诊概率和急诊就诊费用。与GMC患者相比,糖尿病中心患者的糖尿病平均病程更长(12年对6年,P <.01),基线微血管疾病更多(65%对44%,P <.01),基线血糖水平更高(糖化血红蛋白8.6%对7.9%,P <.01)。糖尿病中心患者接受了更多针对血糖监测和控制的强化门诊护理。在所有关于住院和急诊就诊的粗分析和调整分析中,我们发现比较诊所人群时,住院利用率或成本结果没有统计学上的显著差异。
在4年期间,就诊于糖尿病中心对住院资源利用没有明确的积极或消极影响。然而,与GMC患者相比,DC患者的糖尿病病情更严重,但住院利用率并未更高。要明确证明糖尿病中心特点的临床和经济效益,需要对促进全面糖尿病护理(包括心血管预防)的干预措施进行长期对照试验。