Pickles Tom
Genito-Urinary Tumour Group, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver.
Can Fam Physician. 2004 Jan;50:57-63.
To update current evidence for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for prostate cancer and to give readers some practical information to discuss with patients. QUALITY OF EVIDENCE A MEDLINE: search revealed only three randomized studies, two of which are incomplete. Several controlled non-randomized studies were found.
Two ongoing studies have not yet reported survival data, but have added to evidence for screening intervals. One Canadian randomized study has been criticized for its design and conclusions. Non-randomized studies suggest that screening effectively identifies serious cancers and leads to earlier diagnosis. Mortality from prostate cancer has been falling in most western countries since 1992. This cannot be explained by PSA screening, which would probably not produce survival benefit until at least 10 years after its unofficial introduction in about 1990.
Indirect evidence suggests that all men older than 45 with at least a 10-year life expectancy should be informed of the potential benefits and drawbacks of PSA screening so they can make an informed decision on whether to have the test.
更新当前前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)筛查前列腺癌的证据,并为读者提供一些与患者讨论的实用信息。证据质量:对MEDLINE的检索仅发现三项随机研究,其中两项不完整。还发现了几项对照非随机研究。
两项正在进行的研究尚未报告生存数据,但增加了筛查间隔的证据。一项加拿大随机研究因其设计和结论受到批评。非随机研究表明,筛查能有效识别严重癌症并导致早期诊断。自1992年以来,大多数西方国家前列腺癌死亡率一直在下降。这无法用PSA筛查来解释,因为在1990年左右非官方引入PSA筛查后,至少要10年才可能产生生存益处。
间接证据表明,所有年龄超过45岁、预期寿命至少还有10年的男性都应被告知PSA筛查的潜在益处和弊端,以便他们就是否进行该项检测做出明智的决定。