Yoo Hwan Young, Thuluvath Paul J
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Liver Transpl. 2004 Feb;10(2):235-43. doi: 10.1002/lt.20069.
Poor socioeconomic status (SES) may be associated with lower survival after liver transplantation. In a previous study, we showed that African-American race was an independent predictor of poor survival, and one of the major criticisms of our study was that we had not adjusted the survival for SES as a confounding variable. The objective of the present study was to determine the posttransplant outcome of adult liver transplant recipients based on neighborhood income, education, and insurance using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database from 1987 to 2001. Patients (n = 29,481) were divided into 5 groups based on median income as determined by zip code: <30,000 dollars, 30,001-40,000 dollars, 40,001-50,000 dollars, 50,001-60,000 dollars, and >60,000 dollars). Patients (n = 14,814) were divided into 4 groups based on level of education: higher than bachelor's degree; college attendance or technical school; high school education (grades 9-12); less than high school education. Insurance payer status (n = 23,440) was divided into Medicaid, Medicare, government agency, HMO/PPO, and private. Cox regression analysis was used to adjust the survival for other known independent predictors such as age, race, UNOS status, diagnosis, and creatinine. Results showed that neighborhood income had no effect on graft or patient survival either in the entire cohort or within different racial groups. Education had only marginal influence on the outcome; survival was lower in those with a high school education than in those with graduate education. Patients with Medicaid and Medicare had lower survival when compared to those with private insurance. African-Americans had a lower 5-year survival when compared to white Americans after adjusting for SES and other confounding variables. In conclusion, neighborhood income does not influence the outcome of liver transplantation. Education had minimal influence, but patients with Medicare and Medicaid had lower survival compared to those with private insurance.
社会经济地位低下(SES)可能与肝移植术后生存率较低有关。在之前的一项研究中,我们表明非裔美国人种族是生存率低下的一个独立预测因素,而我们这项研究的主要批评之一是,我们没有将SES作为一个混杂变量对生存率进行调整。本研究的目的是利用器官共享联合网络(UNOS)1987年至2001年的数据库,根据邻里收入、教育程度和保险情况来确定成年肝移植受者的移植后结局。患者(n = 29481)根据邮政编码确定的收入中位数分为5组:<30000美元、30001 - 40000美元、40001 - 50000美元、50001 - 60000美元以及>60000美元)。患者(n = 14814)根据教育程度分为4组:高于学士学位;上过大学或技术学校;高中教育(9 - 12年级);低于高中教育。保险支付者状态(n = 23440)分为医疗补助、医疗保险、政府机构、健康维护组织/优先提供者组织以及私人保险。采用Cox回归分析对其他已知的独立预测因素如年龄、种族、UNOS状态、诊断和肌酐进行生存率调整。结果显示,邻里收入对整个队列或不同种族组的移植物或患者生存率均无影响。教育程度对结局仅有微弱影响;高中教育程度者的生存率低于研究生教育程度者。与拥有私人保险的患者相比,参加医疗补助和医疗保险的患者生存率较低。在对SES和其他混杂变量进行调整后,非裔美国人的5年生存率低于美国白人。总之,邻里收入不影响肝移植结局。教育程度影响极小,但参加医疗保险和医疗补助的患者与拥有私人保险的患者相比生存率较低。