Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design (BERD) Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Clin Nurs Res. 2024 Sep;33(7):509-518. doi: 10.1177/10547738241273128. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
Race/ethnicity and individual-level socioeconomic status (SES) may contribute to health disparities in liver transplant (LT) outcomes. The socioeconomic conditions of a neighborhood may either mitigate or exacerbate these health disparities. This retrospective study investigated the relationship between race/ethnicity, individual- and neighborhood-level SES, and LT outcomes, and whether neighborhood-level SES modified the relationship between individual factors and LT outcomes. Adult individuals who underwent LT between 2010 and 2019 ( = 55,688) were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Primary exposures were race/ethnicity, education, primary insurance type, and the Social Deprivation Index (SDI) scores. Education and primary insurance type were used as proxies for individual-level SES, while SDI scores were used as a proxy for neighborhood-level SES. The primary outcome was time to occurrence of graft failure or mortality. Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the associations between the exposures and outcomes. LT recipients who were Black (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.27, < .0001), completed high school or less (HR: 1.06, = .002), and had public insurance (HR: 1.14, < .0001) had a higher rate of graft failure or mortality than those who were White, completed more than high school, and had private insurance, respectively. The SDI scores were not significantly associated with LT outcomes when adjusting for individual factors (HR: 1.02, = .45) and did not modify the associations between individual factors and LT outcomes. Findings of this study suggest that disparities based on individual factors were not modified by neighborhood-level SES. Tailored interventions targeting the unique needs associated with race/ethnicity and individual-level SES are needed to optimize LT outcomes.
种族/民族和个体社会经济地位(SES)可能导致肝移植(LT)结果的健康差异。社区的社会经济状况可能会减轻或加剧这些健康差异。本回顾性研究调查了种族/民族、个体和社区 SES 与 LT 结果之间的关系,以及社区 SES 是否改变了个体因素与 LT 结果之间的关系。从美国器官共享网络数据库中确定了 2010 年至 2019 年期间接受 LT 的成年个体( = 55688)。主要暴露因素为种族/民族、教育程度、主要保险类型和社会剥夺指数(SDI)评分。教育程度和主要保险类型被用作个体 SES 的替代指标,而 SDI 评分则被用作社区 SES 的替代指标。主要结局是移植物失败或死亡的发生时间。使用 Cox 比例风险模型来检查暴露因素与结局之间的关联。与白人、完成高中学历以上和拥有私人保险的 LT 接受者相比,黑人(HR:1.27, < .0001)、完成高中学历或以下(HR:1.06, = .002)和拥有公共保险(HR:1.14, < .0001)的 LT 接受者移植物失败或死亡率更高。在调整个体因素后,SDI 评分与 LT 结局无显著相关性(HR:1.02, = .45),也未改变个体因素与 LT 结局之间的关联。本研究结果表明,基于个体因素的差异不受社区 SES 的影响。需要针对种族/民族和个体 SES 相关的独特需求制定有针对性的干预措施,以优化 LT 结果。