• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Disparities in Liver Transplant Outcomes: Race/Ethnicity and Individual- and Neighborhood-Level Socioeconomic Status.肝移植结局的差异:种族/民族和个体及邻里社会经济地位。
Clin Nurs Res. 2024 Sep;33(7):509-518. doi: 10.1177/10547738241273128. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
2
Socioeconomic Disparities in Adherence and Outcomes After Heart Transplant: A UNOS (United Network for Organ Sharing) Registry Analysis.社会经济差异对心脏移植后依从性和结局的影响:美国器官共享联合网络(UNOS)登记分析。
Circ Heart Fail. 2018 Mar;11(3):e004173. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.117.004173.
3
Racial and socioeconomic disparities in pediatric and young adult liver transplant outcomes.儿童和青年肝移植结局的种族和社会经济差异。
Liver Transpl. 2014 Jan;20(1):100-15. doi: 10.1002/lt.23769. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
4
Contribution of Individual and Neighborhood Factors to Racial Disparities in Respiratory Outcomes.个体和社区因素对呼吸结局的种族差异的贡献。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Apr 15;203(8):987-997. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202002-0253OC.
5
Neighborhood-level social determinants of health measures independently predict receipt of living donor liver transplantation in the United States.社区层面的健康决定因素指标可独立预测在美国接受活体供肝移植的情况。
Liver Transpl. 2024 Jun 1;30(6):618-627. doi: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000313. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
6
Racial/ethnic disparities in wait-list outcomes are only partly explained by socioeconomic deprivation among children awaiting liver transplantation.在等待肝移植的儿童中,社会经济剥夺仅部分解释了等待名单结果的种族/民族差异。
Hepatology. 2022 Jan;75(1):115-124. doi: 10.1002/hep.32106. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
7
Racial and ethnic disparities in cancer survival by neighborhood socioeconomic status in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Registries.监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)登记处中按邻里社会经济地位划分的癌症生存方面的种族和族裔差异。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2014 Nov;2014(49):236-43. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgu020.
8
Neighborhood and Individual Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Survival Among Patients With Nonmetastatic Common Cancers.社区和个体社会经济劣势与非转移性常见癌症患者的生存。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2139593. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.39593.
9
The influence of neighborhood income on healthcare utilization in pediatric liver transplant.社区收入对小儿肝移植患者医疗利用的影响。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2024 Jul;79(1):100-109. doi: 10.1002/jpn3.12234. Epub 2024 May 1.
10
Impact of neighborhood and individual socioeconomic status on survival after breast cancer varies by race/ethnicity: the Neighborhood and Breast Cancer Study.邻里和个体社会经济地位对乳腺癌患者生存的影响因种族/族裔而异:邻里与乳腺癌研究
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 May;23(5):793-811. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0924. Epub 2014 Mar 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Influence of socioeconomic factors on liver transplant survival outcomes in patients with autoimmune liver disease in the United States.社会经济因素对美国自身免疫性肝病患者肝移植生存结局的影响。
Ann Hepatol. 2024 May-Jun;29(3):101283. doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2023.101283. Epub 2023 Dec 25.
2
Human mobility networks reveal increased segregation in large cities.人口流动网络揭示了大城市中隔离程度的增加。
Nature. 2023 Dec;624(7992):586-592. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06757-3. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
3
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Liver Transplantation for Alcohol-associated Liver Diseases in the United States.美国酒精性肝病肝移植中种族和民族差异。
Transplantation. 2024 Jan 1;108(1):225-234. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004701. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
4
Critical interactions between race and the highly granular area deprivation index in liver transplant evaluation.种族与高度细化的区域剥夺指数在肝移植评估中的关键相互作用。
Clin Transplant. 2023 May;37(5):e14938. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14938. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
5
Analysis of socioeconomic status and other factors affecting patient-graft survival in patients undergoing liver transplantation.肝移植患者社会经济状况及其他影响患者-移植物存活因素的分析
Hepatol Forum. 2020 Jan 20;1(1):25-36. doi: 10.14744/hf.2020.0003. eCollection 2020 Jan.
6
Disparities in Social Determinants of Health Among Patients Receiving Liver Transplant: Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample From 2016 to 2019.接受肝移植患者健康的社会决定因素差异:对2016年至2019年全国住院患者样本的分析
Cureus. 2022 Jul 5;14(7):e26567. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26567. eCollection 2022 Jul.
7
Significant improvements, but consistent disparities in survival for African Americans after liver transplantation.肝移植后非裔美国人的生存率虽有显著改善,但仍存在持续差异。
Clin Transplant. 2022 Jun;36(6):e14646. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14646. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
8
A scoping review of inequities in access to organ transplant in the United States.美国器官移植获取机会不公平的范围综述。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Feb 12;21(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01616-x.
9
A retrospective on fundamental cause theory: State of the literature, and goals for the future.根本原因理论回顾:文献现状与未来目标
Annu Rev Sociol. 2021 Jul;47(1):131-156. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-090320-094912. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
10
Association between Longer Travel Distance for Transplant Care and Access to Kidney Transplantation and Graft Survival in the United States.美国范围内,移植护理的旅行距离与肾移植机会和移植物存活率的关联。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021 May 3;32(5):1151-1161. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2020081242. Epub 2021 Mar 12.

肝移植结局的差异:种族/民族和个体及邻里社会经济地位。

Disparities in Liver Transplant Outcomes: Race/Ethnicity and Individual- and Neighborhood-Level Socioeconomic Status.

机构信息

Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.

Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design (BERD) Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Clin Nurs Res. 2024 Sep;33(7):509-518. doi: 10.1177/10547738241273128. Epub 2024 Aug 27.

DOI:10.1177/10547738241273128
PMID:39192612
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11421193/
Abstract

Race/ethnicity and individual-level socioeconomic status (SES) may contribute to health disparities in liver transplant (LT) outcomes. The socioeconomic conditions of a neighborhood may either mitigate or exacerbate these health disparities. This retrospective study investigated the relationship between race/ethnicity, individual- and neighborhood-level SES, and LT outcomes, and whether neighborhood-level SES modified the relationship between individual factors and LT outcomes. Adult individuals who underwent LT between 2010 and 2019 ( = 55,688) were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Primary exposures were race/ethnicity, education, primary insurance type, and the Social Deprivation Index (SDI) scores. Education and primary insurance type were used as proxies for individual-level SES, while SDI scores were used as a proxy for neighborhood-level SES. The primary outcome was time to occurrence of graft failure or mortality. Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the associations between the exposures and outcomes. LT recipients who were Black (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.27,  < .0001), completed high school or less (HR: 1.06,  = .002), and had public insurance (HR: 1.14,  < .0001) had a higher rate of graft failure or mortality than those who were White, completed more than high school, and had private insurance, respectively. The SDI scores were not significantly associated with LT outcomes when adjusting for individual factors (HR: 1.02,  = .45) and did not modify the associations between individual factors and LT outcomes. Findings of this study suggest that disparities based on individual factors were not modified by neighborhood-level SES. Tailored interventions targeting the unique needs associated with race/ethnicity and individual-level SES are needed to optimize LT outcomes.

摘要

种族/民族和个体社会经济地位(SES)可能导致肝移植(LT)结果的健康差异。社区的社会经济状况可能会减轻或加剧这些健康差异。本回顾性研究调查了种族/民族、个体和社区 SES 与 LT 结果之间的关系,以及社区 SES 是否改变了个体因素与 LT 结果之间的关系。从美国器官共享网络数据库中确定了 2010 年至 2019 年期间接受 LT 的成年个体( = 55688)。主要暴露因素为种族/民族、教育程度、主要保险类型和社会剥夺指数(SDI)评分。教育程度和主要保险类型被用作个体 SES 的替代指标,而 SDI 评分则被用作社区 SES 的替代指标。主要结局是移植物失败或死亡的发生时间。使用 Cox 比例风险模型来检查暴露因素与结局之间的关联。与白人、完成高中学历以上和拥有私人保险的 LT 接受者相比,黑人(HR:1.27, < .0001)、完成高中学历或以下(HR:1.06, = .002)和拥有公共保险(HR:1.14, < .0001)的 LT 接受者移植物失败或死亡率更高。在调整个体因素后,SDI 评分与 LT 结局无显著相关性(HR:1.02, = .45),也未改变个体因素与 LT 结局之间的关联。本研究结果表明,基于个体因素的差异不受社区 SES 的影响。需要针对种族/民族和个体 SES 相关的独特需求制定有针对性的干预措施,以优化 LT 结果。