Meining A, Rösch T, Kiesslich R, Muders M, Sax F, Heldwein W
Department of Medicine, City Center Hospital/University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Endoscopy. 2004 Feb;36(2):160-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-814183.
Magnification endoscopy after contrast enhancement with acetic acid or staining with methylene blue has been reported to be highly accurate in predicting specialized intestinal metaplasia (SIM) in Barrett's esophagus. So far, however, no data have been published on the interobserver and intra-observer variability of these new methods.
Fifty-one patients with reflux symptoms were prospectively evaluated. Endoscopy was carried out with a magnification endoscope, and video sequences were recorded in standard and zoom modes (at the 12-o'clock, 3-o'clock, 6-o'clock, and 9-o'clock positions) before and after instillation of 1.5 % acetic acid (n = 26) or staining with 0.5 % methylene blue (n = 25). Biopsies were obtained from the same locations for histopathological examination. The 102 video sequences were shown to four experienced endoscopists in a mixed and blinded fashion. The evaluation criteria used followed the published criteria; classification was carried out according to the pit-pattern structure, methylene blue positivity, and the presence of villous structures. Finally, a general statement on suspected SIM in relation to Barrett's esophagus was requested.
With regard to the criteria selected for evaluation, there was a high level of interobserver variability among the four examiners (all kappa < 0.4). SIM was histologically detectable in 60.8 % of the patients. The accuracy of all of the examiners for predicting SIM by magnification endoscopy was around 50 %, with no differences observed before and after instillation of acetic acid or methylene blue staining.
The suggested criteria for identifying SIM using magnification endoscopy are associated with a high level of interobserver variability. When evaluated in a blinded manner, staining techniques do not significantly improve the yield for detecting SIM at the esophagogastric junction.
据报道,用乙酸造影增强或亚甲蓝染色后的放大内镜检查在预测巴雷特食管的特殊肠化生(SIM)方面具有很高的准确性。然而,到目前为止,尚未有关于这些新方法的观察者间和观察者内变异性的数据发表。
对51例有反流症状的患者进行前瞻性评估。使用放大内镜进行内镜检查,并在滴注1.5%乙酸(n = 26)或用0.5%亚甲蓝染色(n = 25)之前和之后,以标准和变焦模式(在12点、3点、6点和9点位置)记录视频序列。从相同位置获取活检组织进行组织病理学检查。以混合和盲法的方式向四位经验丰富的内镜医师展示这102个视频序列。所使用的评估标准遵循已发表的标准;根据凹坑模式结构、亚甲蓝阳性以及绒毛结构的存在进行分类。最后,要求就巴雷特食管相关的疑似SIM给出总体判断。
就所选择的评估标准而言,四位检查者之间存在高度的观察者间变异性(所有kappa < 0.4)。60.8%的患者在组织学上可检测到SIM。所有检查者通过放大内镜预测SIM的准确性约为50%,在滴注乙酸或亚甲蓝染色前后未观察到差异。
使用放大内镜识别SIM的建议标准与高度的观察者间变异性相关。在盲法评估时,染色技术并未显著提高在食管胃交界处检测SIM的检出率。