Schipper I B, Steyerberg E W, Castelein R M, van der Heijden F H W M, den Hoed P T, Kerver A J H, van Vugt A B
Department of Traumatology, University Hospital of Rotterdam, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Jan;86(1):86-94.
The proximal femoral nail (PFN) is a recently introduced intramedullary system, designed to improve treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures of the hip. In a multicentre prospective clinical study, the intra-operative use, complications and outcome of treatment using the PFN (n = 211) were compared with those using the gamma nail (GN) (n = 213). The intra-operative blood loss was lower with the PFN (220 ml v 287 ml, p = 0.001). Post-operatively, more lateral protrusion of the hip screws of the PFN (7.6%) was documented, compared with the gamma nail (1.6%, p = 0.02). Most local complications were related to suboptimal reduction of the fracture and/or positioning of the implant. Functional outcome and consolidation were equal for both implants. Generally, the results of treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures were comparable for the PFN and GN. The pitfalls and complications were similar, and mainly surgeon- or fracture-related, rather than implant-related.
股骨近端髓内钉(PFN)是一种最近引入的髓内系统,旨在改善髋部不稳定粗隆间骨折的治疗。在一项多中心前瞻性临床研究中,对211例使用PFN和213例使用伽马钉(GN)的患者的术中使用情况、并发症及治疗结果进行了比较。PFN组术中失血量较少(220 ml对287 ml,p = 0.001)。术后记录到,PFN组髋螺钉外侧突出的比例(7.6%)高于伽马钉组(1.6%,p = 0.02)。大多数局部并发症与骨折复位欠佳和/或植入物位置不当有关。两种植入物的功能结果和骨愈合情况相当。总体而言,PFN和GN治疗不稳定粗隆间骨折的结果具有可比性。陷阱和并发症相似,主要与外科医生或骨折相关,而非与植入物相关。