Rashid Rizwan H, Zahid Marij, Mariam Fizzah, Ali Moiz, Moiz Hassan, Mohib Yasir
Orthopedic Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, PAK.
Orthopedics and Traumatology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, PAK.
Cureus. 2024 Apr 11;16(4):e58078. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58078. eCollection 2024 Apr.
Background Intertrochanteric (IT) fractures in the elderly demand surgical intervention for optimal recovery. While dynamic hip screw (DHS) is standard for stable fractures, its use in unstable cases is debated. Proximal femur nail (PFN) addresses unstable per-trochanteric fractures, boasting biomechanical advantages. Many studies favor PFN over DHS, despite concerns like screw migration. In resource-constrained developing nations, the choice of implant is pivotal. This research assesses proximal femur nailing outcomes for unstable fractures, providing insights for regional orthopedic protocols and contributing to tailored treatment guidelines in contexts with limited resources. Objective To assess the clinical and radiological outcomes in patients undergoing proximal femur nailing for unstable per-trochanteric fractures. Material and Methods This retrospective single-arm cohort study was conducted from January 2020 to July 2022. All the consecutive patients who underwent PFN for unstable per-trochanteric fractures were included in this study. Harris Hip Score (HHS) and ambulation status were recorded to evaluate functional outcomes. In contrast, the radiological outcome was assessed by calculating Radiographic Union Score for Hip (RUSH) scores at six weeks, three months, and six months post-operatively. Results A total of 48 patients were included in this study with equal gender distribution and a mean age of 66 years. The functional outcome was recorded with 2.1% (1), 33.3% (16), and 50% (24) of patients achieving full weight bearing (FWB) without pain at six weeks, three months, and six months respectively while 14.6% (7) of the patients never achieved FWB. The radiological outcome was assessed by calculating RUSH score with 6.3% (3), 43.8% (21), and 50% (24) of the patients achieving complete union at the end of six weeks, three months, and six months respectively. One patient (2.1%) experienced malunion. Conclusion PFN remains an optimal treatment modality for the fixation of unstable per-trochanteric fractures yielding promising functional and radiological outcomes.
背景 老年股骨转子间骨折需要手术干预以实现最佳恢复。虽然动力髋螺钉(DHS)是稳定骨折的标准治疗方法,但其在不稳定病例中的应用存在争议。股骨近端髓内钉(PFN)可治疗不稳定的转子周围骨折,具有生物力学优势。尽管存在螺钉移位等问题,但许多研究更倾向于使用PFN而非DHS。在资源有限的发展中国家,植入物的选择至关重要。本研究评估了不稳定骨折的股骨近端髓内钉固定效果,为地区骨科治疗方案提供参考,并为资源有限地区制定个性化治疗指南做出贡献。目的 评估接受股骨近端髓内钉治疗不稳定转子周围骨折患者的临床和影像学结果。材料与方法 本回顾性单臂队列研究于2020年1月至2022年7月进行。所有因不稳定转子周围骨折接受PFN治疗的连续患者均纳入本研究。记录Harris髋关节评分(HHS)和行走状态以评估功能结果。相比之下,通过计算术后六周、三个月和六个月的髋关节放射学愈合评分(RUSH)来评估影像学结果。结果 本研究共纳入48例患者,性别分布均衡,平均年龄66岁。功能结果显示,分别有2.1%(1例)、33.3%(16例)和50%(24例)的患者在六周、三个月和六个月时实现完全负重(FWB)且无疼痛,而14.6%(7例)的患者从未实现FWB。通过计算RUSH评分评估影像学结果,分别有6.3%(3例)、43.8%(21例)和50%(24例)的患者在六周、三个月和六个月结束时实现完全愈合。1例患者(2.1%)出现畸形愈合。结论 PFN仍然是治疗不稳定转子周围骨折的最佳治疗方式,可产生良好的功能和影像学结果。