Limbert Caroline
Psychology Department, Oxford Brookes University, Headington, Oxford, UK.
Health Care Women Int. 2004 Feb;25(2):165-78. doi: 10.1080/07399330490267486.
My objective was to investigate the factor structure and internal consistency of the Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI) among a nonclinical sample. Previous research has indicated that although the EDI appears to be psychometrically sound when used with a clinical sample, the relevance of the measure for a nonclinical population is uncertain. Six hundred forty-seven female university students, average age of 23.3 years, completed a questionnaire including the EDI. I found that the factor structure was supported when items from just five subscales of the EDI were included in the analysis, but when items pertaining to all eight subscales were analysed the factor structure was not supported. The current results cast doubt on the factor structure and internal consistency of the EDI when used with a nonclinical sample, unless just five subscales (drive for thinness, perfectionism, bulimia, interpersonal distrust, and maturity fears) are included. More research is needed to clarify the implications of these findings.
我的目的是调查非临床样本中饮食失调量表(EDI)的因子结构和内部一致性。先前的研究表明,虽然EDI在用于临床样本时似乎在心理测量上是可靠的,但该量表对非临床人群的相关性尚不确定。647名平均年龄为23.3岁的女大学生完成了一份包含EDI的问卷。我发现,当仅将EDI五个子量表的项目纳入分析时,因子结构得到支持,但当分析与所有八个子量表相关的项目时,因子结构未得到支持。除非仅包括五个子量表(追求瘦身、完美主义、暴食症、人际不信任和成熟恐惧),否则当前结果对EDI在非临床样本中使用时的因子结构和内部一致性提出了质疑。需要更多研究来阐明这些发现的含义。